CobraStar_LS8
Dedicated LVC Member
Holy :q:q:q:q! Laser said sorry for something... Let's write this one down
should be in someone's sig...lol
Holy :q:q:q:q! Laser said sorry for something... Let's write this one down
And while I am no math wizzard, I dont think a low 13 second pass equates to a sub 5 second zero to sixty when your trap is 104.
Thats great. As I said, I am no math whiz. Thats some excellent times and killer you are doing them. I look forward to the day that car is back together and knocking back them times agin.I have a couple different acceleration spreadsheets which have shown several of my low 13 second passes as sub 5 second 0-60 mph.
There's a couple online. Here's one (although it always shows a bit faster than what I calculate)...
http://www.wallaceracing.com/0-60_equation.php
If you can get 80+ mph in the 1/8th with mid to low 8s, you're pretty comfortably sub 5 second 0-60. And it can be done with 1.8x sixty foot times.
Now granted, that's at the track on drag tires, something you'd probably never be able to do on the street with street tires.
I'm not bragging, I just enjoy refuting statements I believe to be in error.
Nope.
MediumD brought up his car in a thread
here.
I recalled the motor build that's all.
He has never claimed his wife's car is the fastest NA mark.
Anyhow...its dam cool his wife drives that thing on the street.
Ugly scoop and all
Yes, but thats not were it started. It started here http://www.lincolnvscadillac.com/showthread.php?t=71255 Here he claimes it runs high 12's which is faster than Driller. He is 2/3 down on page one and I am on page two asking if he has any proof. I thought thats were MediumD got his information since it was a little after. If he would have just said no I do not have any proof it would have ended. But he acts offended and says I'll dig up the time slips if you insist. I said sure I would like that. But it never happens. He does have a VERY NICE CAR though.
If you read the post, he needs to prove nothing, he don't care if anyone here believes him.
Honesty, I could care less if his car pulls elevens.
There is a big difference between bragging and stating info.
I see no post were he has said "I have the fastest Na mark"
Acting like he is billy bad ass.
Who knows/cares if one night the air was good, and the track was sticky, and he got a over the top 60 foot time, and it dipped into the twelves.
Give it a rest Don.
I believe it was on drag radials.That would be better than nothing. But it was the high 12 sec. 1/4 with 3:55 gears and a 3500 stall on street tires that beats Driller best time that I would like to see verified.
That would be better than nothing. But it was the high 12 sec. 1/4 with 3:55 gears and a 3500 stall on street tires that beats Driller best time that I would like to see verified.
..what we do know is he isn't running 15.?? which is what a gen 2 out of the box runs in the first place...
why do people always say that my 97 ran a 14.67
with a drop in K&N filter and no silencer
you gen 1 people need to let it go the gen 2 is better
I care. If you give people advice and make claims to back that advice then you should expect and not be offended when someone ask you to back up those claims. Especially when those claims do not sound reasonable and make you the top in your class. As I said, if he just said no I do not have proof that would have ended it. But he replied he would provide the proof and hasn't. Now after plenty of time and a polite reminder He acts offended and suddenly doesn't care. His responses are classic con artist tactics. This bothers me and should those who try to provide and receive creditable information. This isn't personal just fact finding.
get the camera out and start filming the speedometer from 0-?...that should end all of this with no need to dig out time slips...it appears that gen 1's are kicking the crap out of gen 2's in this category of video proof. one thing for sure numbers don't lie...
This chit is getting redonkulous. When I get my motor built. I am gonna have the fastest NA mark. Don I will make sure to send you the proof. Now leave the old man alone. His car is just as fast as your blown gen 1. I know you can't stand it, but it is what it is.
Oh that's right, I forgot.
You don't have one, it was put together by someone else..
One of the main reasons I would prefer 1/4 or 1/8 mile time slips to 0 to 60 videos is if you install gears and do not correct the speedometer it appear you are going much faster than you really are.
The last you talk to me your car was to be S/C and NOS ??? PS I'm older than him. http://www.youtube.com/user/DonsCobraMarkVIII
Yes, gear changes do not effect speerdo on Gen II cars. Only tire size can change it. I thought Gen I was the same?As I understand, Gen IIs speedometers are not affected by a gear change.