Wheels That Fit Mark VIII's

SonOfThomp

LVC Member
Joined
Sep 21, 2014
Messages
32
Reaction score
1
Location
Austin
Post #36:
"Originally Posted by KStromberg View Post
I have the 18X9 Speedstar wheels with the Mark8 bolt-pattern.
36mm offset
Sensor lowered
245-45s up front and 265-40s out back.
PERFECT fit with no rub anywhere ever."

Perhaps he stiffened his suspension? Since he lowered his car AND added big tires, maybe?
 

chris2523

93 Mark VIII
Joined
Nov 8, 2007
Messages
7,911
Reaction score
266
Location
Central MO
the 36 mm offset keeps the wheels tucked up under the car, and 245 or 265 isn't overly wide of a tire either.

Big Red has nice stance, but it doesn't sit overly low either.
 

SonOfThomp

LVC Member
Joined
Sep 21, 2014
Messages
32
Reaction score
1
Location
Austin
I'm going to re-post this, since I need to get new tires soon. Mine are from 2001. yep.

Anyway,

Found some wheels, with these specs:

17X7.5, 5 LUG, 4 1/2" OR 114.3MM BOLT PATTERN, 44MM OFFSET

If the stock wheels are 39mm offset and 7" wide, the wheels spec'd above would have or 13.2mm more backspacing, considering the 1/2" more backspace and 5mm more offset, right? And if I use 1.25" adapters, it would adequately compensate, regarding the backspacing, and would work on my MkVIII. I'm thinking 235-60R-17 tires.

Would this work with stock, air ride suspension??

Thanks
 

chris2523

93 Mark VIII
Joined
Nov 8, 2007
Messages
7,911
Reaction score
266
Location
Central MO
that set up will net you a 12 mm offset.
1.25 inches = 32 mm 44-32=12
that is too low, and will stick out a lot.
also a 235/60-17 tire will be too tall.
you should run something more like a 235/50-17 or a 245/45-17.
 

SonOfThomp

LVC Member
Joined
Sep 21, 2014
Messages
32
Reaction score
1
Location
Austin
By my calculations, they would stick out about an inch. It seems that would be negligible from an aesthetic standpoint, to me anyway. If I use a tire the same diameter, or maybe slightly taller (1" max), is that what makes you wary of fender rub?
And lastly, the adequate backspacing would be achieved though, right? Should have 3/4" more than stock. But I really want to know before I pull the trigger ....
 

BlackOnBlackCobra96

LVC Member
Joined
Oct 16, 2014
Messages
43
Reaction score
0
Location
Cleveland
What's the widest tire that would fit on a 17x9 Cobra R rim, front and back? I'd like to go with P255s on front and perhaps P275s on rear.
 

LunaEros

Well-Known LVC Member
Joined
Jan 4, 2013
Messages
253
Reaction score
13
Location
Hickory, NC
Don't have good pic's only a couple after they were on for a while and car had been damaged from accidents.

But my first Mark VIII (94) I put 92 Factory white Taurus SHO 'Slicers' 16"x6"
And they looked pretty damn good.
They fit perfectly with no mods.
94 Damage 3.jpg

94 Damage 3.jpg
 

chris2523

93 Mark VIII
Joined
Nov 8, 2007
Messages
7,911
Reaction score
266
Location
Central MO
By my calculations, they would stick out about an inch. It seems that would be negligible from an aesthetic standpoint, to me anyway. If I use a tire the same diameter, or maybe slightly taller (1" max), is that what makes you wary of fender rub?
And lastly, the adequate backspacing would be achieved though, right? Should have 3/4" more than stock. But I really want to know before I pull the trigger ....

hmm, the numbers aren't ideal, but it may work if you keep the tire size down. run a 245/45-17 or so.

What's the widest tire that would fit on a 17x9 Cobra R rim, front and back? I'd like to go with P255s on front and perhaps P275s on rear.

my 96 LSC wears 275/40-17 tires on 04 Cobra wheels.
it is lowered and on tokico springs.
 

chris2523

93 Mark VIII
Joined
Nov 8, 2007
Messages
7,911
Reaction score
266
Location
Central MO
Don't have good pic's only a couple after they were on for a while and car had been damaged from accidents.

But my first Mark VIII (94) I put 92 Factory white Taurus SHO 'Slicers' 16"x6"
And they looked pretty damn good.
They fit perfectly with no mods.

ah yes, thanks for the reminder.

-Taurus SHO "Slicers"
-16x6", 42mm offset
-Blizzaks
-215/65-16
-stock height air ride
-no rub

15401966799_ff1d999af5_b.jpg
2014-10-03 21.34.44 by chris2523, on Flickr
 

SonOfThomp

LVC Member
Joined
Sep 21, 2014
Messages
32
Reaction score
1
Location
Austin
hmm, the numbers aren't ideal, but it may work if you keep the tire size down. run a 245/45-17 or so.

Here's why I think it will work:

1. Backspacing OK, actually a bit more than stock.

2. Only sticks out another inch.

3. Below

thought I'd update the thread with my current wheels.

97 Cobra wheels 17x8 with 30mm offset, 255/50/17 nitto nt555s. Still on tokico lowering springs.

20140219_150815_zpsd29fc3e0.jpg

Max tire size I am considering is 235-55R-17. 1/2" taller than stock.
Will keep you all posted.
 

Bangster

Dedicated LVC Member
Joined
Mar 2, 2005
Messages
537
Reaction score
44
Location
Tucson
Here's why I think it will work:

1. Backspacing OK, actually a bit more than stock.

2. Only sticks out another inch.

3. Below

Be interesting to see the results. Probably won't be clown car looking with half the tire outside the fender, but would be beyond what I would feel looks good, and I can't imagine being happy dragging the fender on the tire under normal driving conditions. I guess air suspension or non cheapo conversion coils will have less compression with any weight in the car or hitting bumps.
 

SonOfThomp

LVC Member
Joined
Sep 21, 2014
Messages
32
Reaction score
1
Location
Austin
ALL:
What are you opinions for tire size, 17x7.5 rims?
Handling and ride are more important than looks.
THANKS
 

DreDaDevil

Active LVC Member
Joined
Nov 17, 2006
Messages
70
Reaction score
0
Location
Bensalem
Well, after I settle my transmission issue, I will be doing a hub swap. I got a set of black replica bullits 18x9 up front and 18x10 in the rear.What year mustang will I need in order to do the swap?
 

Markviiiedrea

Speed Bump
Joined
Sep 20, 2004
Messages
4,746
Reaction score
168
Location
Bloomington, MN
Here is a good article about unsprung weight.

Read and educate yourself before asking to be spoonfeed.

Source:http://www.tuneruniversity.com/blog/2011/04/part-i-why-wheel-weight-slows-most-people-down/


Why does wheel weight matter? Wheel weight, if nothing else, is part of the vehicle’s weight and will need to be carried along with the car’s mass everywhere it goes. It Is one of the cheaper and easier items to change on a car, especially when it comes to weight. It’s free to lose weight by removing items, but replacing components with lighter weight parts is usually expensive. Wheels, are multipurpose items and they can usually be the source of quite a few pounds of weight loss at a much better value than carbon fiber hoods and the like.

They are also a special sort of weight. Wheels turn (obviously) and therefore they are rotational weight. If you pick up a 30lb weight it may feel a little heavy in your hands. However, if you attach that same weight to a piece of chain or rope and begin to swing it, you’ll find out quite quickly that it is much harder to spin a 30lb weight than to simply hold it. It is also requires more and more energy the further out you let that weight slide from you. So, if you spin a 30lb weight on a 2ft piece of chain, it’s a lot easier than even a 3 ft section of chain.


The same goes for your car. A 30lb weight sitting on the floor is easier for your engine to pull down the road than a 30lb spinning wheel is.

It’s not as simple as saying (as some people do) that a lb off the wheels is worth 2x, or even 10x what a lb off the interior of the car is worth. The reasons are complex. For one, the weight of the wheel is distributed over a large area. Some aftermarket wheels have quite a lot of their weight focused at the center of the wheel (at the hub of the wheel), whereas others may have more of their weight focused on the rim of the wheel. It all depends on the material, construction, and style of the rim you’re using.

Also, the weight of the tires and where that weight is relative to the center of the wheel, is also important. We’ll talk more about that when we talk about sizing. For now, just understand that the further the weight is from the center of the wheel, the more it matters.

Now, the wheel is also one other special type of weight, which is UNsprung weight. On your car, there are two types of weight. One is sprung (or held up by the springs), the other is unsprung weight. Which, in most cars includes things like the brakes, the control arms, the wheels, tires, and so forth.

UNsprung weight is another complicated topic so I’ll try to keep it simple for this discussion. As you drive down the road, the road is pushing up and down on the suspension (the car is also doing the same, but let’s save that discussion for high school physics class). Other forces are at work too, when you corner for example, the weight transfer from turning puts a force on the suspension and relieves a force on the opposite side.

The suspension (aptly the springs and shocks) have to control both the weight of the car, and the unsprung components of the car. The lighter either component is, the easier job they have.

When you reduce the wheel weight, for example, whenever a wheel moves, the spring can more easily bring that wheel back to where it needs to be. In effect, it has a similar effect of fitting stiffer suspension springs or dampers. The reason is that the wheel has momentum wherever it’s traveling. Momentum is the objects desire to keep moving in a certain direction unless another force acts upon it.

Momentum is best ‘felt’ or demonstrated by thinking about pushing a light grocery cart and then trying to stop, versus pushing a several hundred pound cart and trying to stop. The heavier object has more momentum and is therefore harder to control.

Handling is all about controlling weight. Sway bars help control weight transfer, springs help control weight transfer, shocks control weight and help absorb shock.

Unfortunately, I don’t have the space to go much deeper here. However, hopefully you’re starting to understand at least at the most basic level why wheel weight is important.

The bottom line is, the lighter your wheels (preferably with the majority of their weight focused at the center of the wheel), the easier your suspension can keep the tires planted firmly on the ground.

Lighter wheels also allow more torque to be available to push the car down the road. Turning a wheel requires TORQUE, so in smaller engines, lighter wheels really do make a difference.

There are two other side effects of lighter wheels that I don’t have time to talk about much here: better gas mileage (in the city only, no effect on highway mileage), better ride quality. The first comes from there being less weight to spin up every time you run through the gears. We’re not talking about huge MPG gains here, but I’ve seen 1-2mpg in the city before on certain vehicles. The other comes from the suspensions ability to respond to road imperfections better, and, the wheels’ weight is less significant so it upsets the chassis less when it moves around. It’s kind of like having a big sack of cement in the trunk versus your laptop – one actually makes the car feel different, the other does not.

Finally, lighter wheels can be stopped faster. In the real world, you may see a slight decrease in stopping distance (as-in, slight), and a slight decrease in the amount of heat you see at the brake rotor due to less energy being absorbed thanks to your lighter wheels.

In closing, whenever choosing parts for the unsprung portion of your car, always try to minimize weight whenever possible. There are some times when an increase in unsprung weight can be warranted, but as a general rule – the lighter, the better.
 

slowmkviii

Dedicated LVC Member
Joined
Sep 28, 2007
Messages
5,686
Reaction score
162
Location
Elk River, MN
Yes they do
But good luck getting new ones
The coustom wheel shop seems to have given up on mark viii wheels.
 

Members online

Top