Trump

And as far as your "acceptable death rate" meme... I'm sure Obama had the numbers before he left Office.

Anybody with half their functional faculties working... would realize Trump downplayed everything to prevent panic.

How close the U.S. came to disaster in "The Bay of Pigs" incident... wasn't revealed until decades later.

You poor nupty... some day you might figure things out.;)
 
hrmwrm said:
sure he did. he also had to turn around an economy that busted at the end of the last administration.
the great economy impotus inherited.
obama still had times of better growth than impotus.
check how long this growth run has been.
it started over a decade ago, not 3 years ago.
Click to expand...

And THAT is the biggest bunch of BS.

Obama taxed corporations @ 35%...so the corporations left the U.S. to avoid high taxes. Some even closed up completely.

Obama also allowed China to devalue its currency... then flood the U.S market with super cheap goods... causing more U.S. job loss.

Obama was the greatest president China ever had.

When Trump won in 2016... corporations started coming back before Trump even took office.

You need to zip your fly. Your ignorance is showing.
 
5974.jpeg
 
I can tell you this...

Only 1 of the 4 unsolicited mail in ballots I received through the mail... came from my local Board of Elections.

And I'd lay money on the fact that some of the same dead people that voted for Hillary in 2016... also voted for Biden in 2020.
 
And... I find it a bit Ironic... that the majority of Blue States, (especially the coastal ones), have the strictest gun laws... and more violence... and more mass shootings, than the rest of the country.
 
Guess it's starting already...

Shutdown of Shell refinery in Convent: Negotiations for job transfers and severance begin

Probably shuttering it's doors to make way for the Keystone Pipeline.

That was Obama's pet project that never happened... pumping the Husky Canadian oil sands territory... and sending it to the Gulf for a slow boat ride to China.

How do you like that Wrm??? Seems the U.S. isn't the only country willing to sell it's citizens out... due to unscroupulous deals with foreign powers.:mad:
 
hrmwrm said:
In all, 14 Trump aides, donors and advisers have been indicted or imprisoned since the days when the first-time candidate promised that he would only hire "the best people."
how long ago was ted kennedy?
before you were born?
that doesn't include impotus himself.
Click to expand...

Some of those people had ties to the Bilderberg Group. They were most likely "plants" to subvert Trump's administration.

Keep in mind Bilderberg planned for Hillary to win the election.
 
hrmwrm said:
and another suit bites the dust, hey hey,
another suit bites the dust.
no voter fraud. funny, no dead voters either.
the hoax was impotus all along.
Click to expand...
Put up or shut up.
Show me ONE suit that was rejected on the merits of claims.
Keep in mind, you can't do that without an evidentiary hearing and discovery, none of which has been allowed.


Scenes from a recent bench trial of a murder case.

Judge: You have no proof Joe murdered the victim.

Prosecutor: I have presented 10 affidavits from witnesses saying they saw Joe shoot the victim.

Judge: That is not proof. That is just an allegation. Where is the murder weapon?

Prosecutor: You refused to grant us a warrant (without proof) to seize Joe's (registered) gun to examine it.

Judge: So you have no murder weapon. What about the supposed bloody clothes Joe was wearing?

Prosecutor: Since we had no warrant we could not go into his house and find the clothes. We did see smoke coming out of his chimney two days after the murder.

Judge: Clearly you have no evidence and have falsely accused Joe of murder. I dismiss these charges with prejudice never to be revisited for all time.

Network coverage: Joe acquitted of false charges made by deluded extremist nutjobs. Experts call for prosecutor to be prosecuted and disbarred.

Social Media: Fact checkers show that Joe was falsely accused. Anyone making any statements contravening that will be banned for 30 days to life.

Our world today.
 
hrmwrm said:
no merit to their claims.
they provide no evidence.
it's up to them filing to provide the evidence.
i saw the witnesses.
lucky they aren't in jail for perjury.
in case you forget, even the supreme court threw it out.
even with impotus stacking.
THEY said no. go away.
you're religious, so it makes sense.
believing what you're told by a carny barker or facts.
see it how you like.
FACTS are FACTS.
not faith.
you can believe the moon is made of cheese.
doesn't make it fact or truth.
you grapple with those differentiations.
that's why you believe carzy sh!t.
Click to expand...

1st: Affidavits ARE evidence, moron.
2nd: Evidence is only able to even be presented in court in an evidentiary hearing, and efforts at confirmation of early evidence are done through discovery. Again, NO COURT HAS ALLOWED THIS. Put up or shut up; show me 1 case that has allowed an evidentiary hearing and discovery.

There is PLENTY of evidence available. If you read the Texas case, it lays the evidence and concerns out quite well. It was not rejected by the courts because of evidence (the court's ruling is basically a paragraph, if you are contesting this point, you will need to provide an actual quote). There are plenty of other places to find documented evidence as well. And strong analysis of evidence as well. You can look at statistical anomalies indicating data manipulation (Benford's Law, for instance). Broader election abnormalities. Unconstitutional and otherwise questionable rule changes to break chain's of custody, frustrate confirmation of signatures, etc (this is where the TX case focused), shady and contradictory actions by election officials to cover up fraud. Judges literally changing the standard after their initial standard is met, looking to avoid the issue. Plenty of evidence. We even have them on video counting ballots after kicking out observers, and running ballots multiple times.

Robert Barnes, a practicing attorney with a strong background in election law, summarized it as follows:
This election comes down to the fact most states scrapped their singular check on illegal ballots: the signature-match check on mail-in ballots. Most either watered down the method of making the signature-match check or didn't really enforce it strictly at all. The net effect was millions of illegal ballots cast and counted across the nation, more than the margin of victory in each key swing state. The biggest remedy would be an independently-observed, signature-match-check process. Guess what every state officials refused to do, and is refusing to do? An independently-observed, signature-match-check process. The biggest hurdle for Trump is the likely cowardice of courts & Congress in making this simple remedy available or actionable.

​
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Members online

No members online now.
Total: 197 (members: 0, guests: 197)
Back
Top