Trump

A smart debate with someone who is determined to act like a dumbbell is a contradiction. (See how I did that---calling out the action and not the person? ;))

KS
 
And now it seems as if the 'signed' entry in the yearbook is being called into question by a handwriting expert. If Moore did wrong, it should by shown by the light of day. But as it is, we have have a highly convenient 'expose' at just-before-an-election, with no suggestion of that sort of impropriety in his back history. Allred is spending money like crazy, and women are, in consequence, coming out of the woodwork.

It's also been suggested that he went out with younger women.

When I was 29, I asked a girl to go out with me under the impression that she was 24-25. Not long before I took her home at the conclusion of that first date, I found out that she was 18. But she acted much more mature than her chronological age. I married her a year later. That was 45 years ago. She's eating cornflakes about 6 feet from me as I peck this out. Go figure!

You lib-progressives are just in agony to find something you can wuzzle about. Grow up! Trump won the election!

KS
 
cammerfe said:
And now it seems as if the 'signed' entry in the yearbook is being called into question by a handwriting expert. If Moore did wrong, it should by shown by the light of day. But as it is, we have have a highly convenient 'expose' at just-before-an-election, with no suggestion of that sort of impropriety in his back history. Allred is spending money like crazy, and women are, in consequence, coming out of the woodwork.

It's also been suggested that he went out with younger women.

When I was 29, I asked a girl to go out with me under the impression that she was 24-25. Not long before I took her home at the conclusion of that first date, I found out that she was 18. But she acted much more mature than her chronological age. I married her a year later. That was 45 years ago. She's eating cornflakes about 6 feet from me as I peck this out. Go figure!

You lib-progressives are just in agony to find something you can wuzzle about. Grow up! Trump won the election!

KS
Click to expand...

Moore claimed this. Its not been substantiated at all. Allred has called Moore out to go on record and oath about it, and Moore has yet to reply.

Handwriting expert say Signatures change with age, and that the best way to test is to DNA the ink. If it is found to be inked in 1977, age wise, Moore is a liar again. Its said that Allred has already had this done, and will disclose the DNA when Moore gets under oath as a Documented Liar.

For the record, Im Not a Lib, or Progressive, but Im not a Dumb ass who ignores that the whole Town knew Roy Moore was a Adult who chased and tried to date little Girls either.

You can continues with the name calling, its just takes away from your claims, especially when you continue to call names then tell others....... to Grow up. LOL!
 
jgscott said:
Moore claimed this. Its not been substantiated at all. Allred has called Moore out to go on record and oath about it, and Moore has yet to reply.

Handwriting expert say Signatures change with age, and that the best way to test is to DNA the ink. If it is found to be inked in 1977, age wise, Moore is a liar again. Its said that Allred has already had this done, and will disclose the DNA when Moore gets under oath as a Documented Liar.

For the record, Im Not a Lib, or Progressive, but Im not a Dumb ass who ignores that the whole Town knew Roy Moore was a Adult who chased and tried to date little Girls either.

FYI: some of Roy Moores Female accusers are Republican Voters in Al, who Voted for Trump.

You can continues with the name calling, its just takes away from your claims, especially when you continue to call names then tell others....... to Grow up. LOL!
Click to expand...

Mods please Delete. Post 162 and 160 posted by error.
 
Say it on the forum and then post that it should be deleted.:rolleyes:

Why not do it yourself as you did above.

Act like a lib-progressive and disclaim what goes with it???

KS
 
Actually, I DO get it. Those from the left end of things are S O O O O wonderful that they have no comprehension of having lost the last election. They whinge and wuzzle and generally carry on in an attempt to undermine most of the country, who are extremely tired of the 'tax-'n'-spend and the blm and antifa and all the other attempts at grabbing power. After, they're SO wonderful that they have no comprehension in regard to resistance to their majestic ideas. If we'd all just do a proper job of being subservient to their notions and let them (you) pat us on our disheveled heads and tell us what's good for us, everything would be just fine.

Billery would be able to sell half of our remaining Uranium to our enemies, and the Fund For The Benefit Of C-'n'-C (Clintons and Cronies) would get donations of a few hundred more millions.

Suck it up! Hillary lost!

KS
 
Keep your friends close and your enemies closer. It would be major stupidity to refuse to talk to someone just because you didn't see eye-to-eye. You never know what you might discover.

After all, I'm talking to you, and there's NO sign that you wish me any good.

Parroting the MSM talking points mostly shows me your wishful thinking and refusal to acknowledge the failure of the leftist-liberal-progressive agenda. Please let me issue you a whole book of TS chits. You obviously need them.

BTW, what's a 'persons opinioned attack'? Sounds like gibberish to me.

KS
 
Last edited:
If basic decency and mutual respect is what is expected on this forum, then hrmwrm has no place on it.
 
First, this isn't a US civics class. Why don't you do a thorough study to answer your supposition and then report back to the rest of us on your exploration. With footnotes to show where your information comes from.

That brings up another point. You were either sitting in the Principal's office when the call mentioned came in. Or, perhaps, you saw it on some internet blog. And we all know how EVERYTHING on the internet is true and therefore proper to repeat as gospel. No, wait,... (uproar of laughter in background...)

Decimation actually means to destroy one-in-ten. Comes from Latin where Roman Legionnaires would line up captured people and pull every tenth one out of line and kill them as a lesson to the others.

The ignorant make it a sweeping gesture of killing everybody in sight---as you did.

KS
 
Last edited:
hrmwrm said:
well, you can continue to be a dink ks or we can try and get back to some actual discussion.
but, your incapable. take care.
Click to expand...

Calling names? Ad hominem attacks are forbidden by Joey! see above. In order to keep the discussion at an even level, please learn to capitalize the first word in a sentence and discover the difference between 'your' (a possessive form) and 'you're', which is a contraction of 'you are'. Thanks!

KS
 
You didn't finish with, "It must be true. It's on the internet." You're falling down on the job.

And you changed the subject.

KS
 
You'd try to claim the sun was shining brightly on you if you were standing outside at midnight.

KS
 
Language, language. The greatest difference is that the Allred-paid complainers can't even get their stories straight. The downtown-Detroit ancient-old-fart and the clown from SNL have offered us pictures of their activities and records of their payoffs to try to shut people up. They are convicted by self-offered proof.

Anyone can be accused of anything. Providing the proof of your own misdeeds is the bailiwick of the progressive left.

'...argument...' has no 'e' in the middle. Didn't pay much attention in school, did you?

KS
 
Last edited:
Do you ever have an original thought or is it entirely cut-'n'-paste with you? There are many muddled thinkers on all sides---I simply keep my own counsel.

Long ago there was a short movie that was used as part of driver training. It showed a driver, under stress, regressing to little more than an infant while standing on the seat in the driver's position. And jumping up and down, yelling/crying unintelligibly while trying to steer.

When I think of you, that's the picture that comes to mind.

KS
 
Last edited:
hrmwrm said:
what picture is that? trumps impeachment?
Click to expand...

Are you really as dumb as you seem? Try to retain things---at least for the time it takes to go through at least a few posts. This is #191---go back to #186.

For the rest of it, your wishful thinking is showing.

Ken
 
It's really very simple. Put your little arrow cursor on the small pyramid at the upper right. Push your left-side contact on your mouse (The little thing you use to move the cursor.) and go back to #186. In it, I told you about the picture. Read it and your fog might lift a little.

Ken
 
I can't be bothered to read the drivel of a known liar and check-out line dreck purveyor. Will you act like a man when this all comes out in Trump's favor?

Ken
 
hrmwrm said:
bannon admitted it when he said he meant paul manafort, not don jr. :D
see, that's the problem of faith over reason. the evidence is in front of you, but you put your fingers in your ears and go lalala!:rolleyes:
Click to expand...

Non sequitur. (You may have to look it up!)

Do you realize you just changed the subject? Seems to be a bit of fog around your upper story.
Ken
 
hrmwrm said:
why, did you have to look it up to post it?
Click to expand...

No, I studied Latin as far back as when I was in High School. Some of it stays with me even at this late date.

You didn't answer regarding changing the subject.

Ken
 
Last edited:
You must log in or register to reply here.

Members online

Total: 305 (members: 2, guests: 303)
Back
Top