ripped camel
Dedicated LVC Member
to an outsidern00b that may appear to be the case.
in actuality the Kmember swap is more for improving front/rear weight balance & chassis stiffness.
tubular control arms are also for increased stiffness/less deflection
P.S.
NONE of the above has ANY impact on "unprung" weight.
Really? Wow I didn't know you worked for Steeda and were trained on suspension. I guess this is a fallacy then....
TUBULAR K-MEMBERS
QA1's tubular K-members are designed from the ground up for weight savings, improved geometry and as a bolt-in swap for the factory K-member in race applications. May alter wheel base and stance.
. Bolt-In Design All mounting points have been digitally indexed from new, factory K-members.
. Weight Savings Up to 28 lbs. lighter than the factory K-members with increased strength by design.
Yeah no weight savings! Quit acting like you know everything under the sun. You are not a car god. Do you know more than me about cars? yes. Do you know more about every single literal aspect about cars than me? no.
If you were as good as you try to insinuate you would be the next Roush, Steeda, Saleen....Sadly that is not the case. So quit trying to act as though you are the know-all, end-all answer for cars
Also here....
TUBULAR CONTROL ARMS
Tubular control arms reduce unsprung weight while improving weight distribution in race applications. QA1 tubular control arms require the use of QA1 coil-over struts and QA1 caster/camber plates.