.
Interesting, because your link is basically spin, while mine is the direct link to the group being attacked, yet you seem to just brush it off...I read the link you posted about the new american century as well but it wouldn't pull your chain the way my link did.
Rather telling
I was never comparing myself or my education with that of Bush.
No, but you were attacking his intellect through his education, which makes your education somewhat relevant to the discussion, at least in comparison to him.
As to my spelling and grammar maybe you should look at your's before you point out mine.
You supposedly wrote a book so you should have higher standards
Examples
1. an irrational hartred- should be hatred
2. Bush senior's carreer- should be career
3. Lets compare your grades to theirs - should be their's
debate in those cercumstances?- should be circumstances.
4. The guy cant open his yap without some christian overtones - should be can't
5. Fortunately over 50% of the country disagreed with you- should be voters instead of country.
6. though you have shown thta you don't use your head- should be that instead of thta
Well theres the problem, your Canadian - should be there's
7. Doesn't like debate or critisism- should be criticism
8. You obviously hae no clue how the govenment works or what the function of military is.- should be has not hae and government not govenment and function of (the) military is.
Nobody usually plays grammar police on boards but you ironically have made 10 spelling errors in your post while criticising
my use of the english language.
Perhaps you should run spell check and re read what you write before posting.
There are always errors like these in your posts.
Anyways I just wanted to wish everyone a happy new year
and more interesting provoking posts in 2008.
I wrote a book? When?
How does any of this critisism (hehe) have any relevance to the debate? Seems to me you are just avoiding the points I made here.
As far as I am concerned, grades in college are irrelevant, as are spelling and grammer (to a degree) as long as the point is made. You were the one citing Bushs' "C" student status as relevant, even though it isn't.
I have been effectively punished (as far as grades go) for holding conservative values in school, in some classes. Many of the wisest people I know were hardly superb students, while many of the most foolish people I know were "A" students. College today is at least as much about indoctrination as it is about teaching critical thinking (if not more). Maybe it was different when you went to college, but that is the way it is today. All good grades mean in many colleges today is that you studied tenaciously, and you can regurgitate liberal propaganda (at least in certian programs). It usually says nothing about your critical thinking abilities (or lack thereof).
What you are citing is irrelevant to the discussion here, and nothing but a cheap attack.
Oh, so you noticed that Mespock hasn't been around since the beginning of the year also.![]()
Ya, huge Packer fan. Only made 5 games this year.![]()
Favre beating Brady in the Super Bowl would be the greatest story ever told in football. The old gunslinger leading the kids to victory. One can only dream.
Stupider? Is that a word? (when you are attacking someones intellect, it helps if you use good grammar).
Well you attacked my use of the english language otherwise I wouldn't bring it up.
I wasn't sure what you meant by "christian quote". I thought you must be referring to the Bible because you used the term "quote". I'm still not sure what you're referring to. What do you mean by "christian overtones"? Do you have an example?
I think its got legsIs it just me or did anybody else feel the air just go out of this thread?
Two gamesDream go to sleep and dream about those packers.. they have only one game left this year.
Stupider? Is that a word? (when you are attacking someones intellect, it helps if you use good grammar).
Well you attacked my use of the english language otherwise I wouldn't bring it up.
I stand corrected.
I didn't think "stupider" was a word. It just sounds like bad english to me, hence the question.
This example is after your initial post.![]()
From today
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/22443302/
Mike Huckabee, a Republican relying on support from religious conservatives in Thursday's hard-fought Iowa presidential caucuses, on Sunday stood by a decade-old comment in which he said, "I hope we answer the alarm clock and take this nation back for Christ."
![]()
So, when Hillary uses a fake southern accent to try to appeal to southern voters does that also tell you that she's not strong enough to win on her own? Instead, she has to disingenuously pander to southern voters. Also, you're probably right in that Huckabee has asked God for help through prayer--After all, he is Christian, and Christians do appeal to God for help.Prayers may go over well with the evangelical base but not so much with mainstream voters.
In a way it says "I'm not strong enough to win on my own so please help me God"
All politicians are manipulative and desire to win however they can.
Huckabee is appealing to people's Christian faith which is more exclusionary
than a regional accent
People of other faiths, or no faith will say he's not really interested in my vote or he wouldn't be so in your face with the emphasis on religion.
We'll see if he uses the same MO in New Hampshire which has a lot more moderate voters.
If Hillary does win the Democratic nomination it will be good fortune for the Republican Party as they'll all unite to fight her as this LA Times article suggests:
GOP BASE SCATTERS TO RIVAL CAMPS
http://www.latimes.com/news/nationworld/nation/la-na-gop2jan02,0,2826395.story?coll=la-home-nation
This example is after your initial post.
Huckabee has asked God for help through prayer--After all, he is Christian, and Christians do appeal to God for help.
No I what I said wasfordnut may be a bit intemperate here but in essence he seems to be saying that Huckabee is manipulating his evangelical base.
Couldnt agree with you more I I hear one more christian quote from Huckabee I am going to puke
Interesting how religious tolerance should only go one way, according to some in this country...
Athiests don't have to tolerate Christians, but Christians must go out of their way to accomodate (much more then tolerate) athiests.
Is this pointed at me shagdrum ?
Republican presidential hopeful Mike Huckabee, an ordained Southern Baptist minister, asks in an upcoming article, ''Don't Mormons believe that Jesus and the devil are brothers?''
Who gives a $hit ? I don't .....the bible thumpers in Iowa must I guess.
You wanted one I gave you one. you want a older one here.
Republican presidential hopeful Mike Huckabee, an ordained Southern Baptist minister, asks in an upcoming article, ''Don't Mormons believe that Jesus and the devil are brothers?''
Who gives a $hit ? I don't .....the bible thumpers in Iowa must I guess.
He can ask god all he wants that dosen't mean I want to hear about it.
Then I stand corrected and apologize for attributing fordnut's statement to you.I was quoting fordnut MAC1
It's a free (mostly) country.
Religious people don't bother me and I don't bother them.
Bush and the evangelicals haven't forced me to go to church or interefered with my life.
I'm just always wary of the politician who hides his shortcomings by invoking God.