Which city does Iran nuke first?

Even more the reason to believe they would get the software and everything else they need from the Russians. The Russians are pretty pissed about Obama.

But I still think anything would be neutralized before getting out of the Middle East's air space.
 
:bowrofl:

good catch. I am sure its another language or something. But that still looked funny.
 
JWerner2 said:
Even more the reason to believe they would get the software and everything else they need from the Russians.
Click to expand...

Ya, that's not too far a stretch.

http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D96FD6000&show_article=1

MOSCOW (AP) - Iran's defense minister said Friday he hopes to obtain new weapons from Russia to upgrade the nation's arsenals. Iran has relied on Russian military assistance in the past and hopes to continue doing so, Mostafa Mohammed Najjar said.

"Russia has advanced military technologies, we have used them and plan to keep using them," he said at a news conference.

Najjar wouldn't elaborate on what specific weapons Iran was seeking. He met with his Russian counterpart and toured some Russians weapons plants during his five-day visit that began Monday.

Moscow has developed close ties with Tehran and is building its first nuclear power plant.

Russia also has supplied weapons to Iran, including Tor-M1 air-defense missiles, despite U.S. and Israeli complaints. However, Russian officials have rejected claims that they have provided Iran with more powerful, long-range S-300 air defense missile systems.

Supplying the S-300s to Iran would markedly change the military balance in the Middle East and the issue has been the subject of intense speculation and diplomatic wrangling for months.
 
9780743231497.jpg
 
Im not pro Israeli but Im not worried if they attacked at all even if Russia does supply Iran. Anyone hear of 'The six day war'?;)
 
JWerner2 said:
Im not pro Israeli but Im not worried if they attacked at all even if Russia does supply Iran. Anyone hear of 'The six day war'?;)
Click to expand...

The six day part isn't the problem.
But those wars actually put the U.S. and Soviets on the verge of going to war with each other. The U.S. in position to support Israel, the Soviets positioned to support Egypt.

In the modern day, Israel will strike, but there will be international fall out, especially if we're in a world wide financial recession. Iran may lash out around the world with terror, cut off the Straights, oil prices would sky rocket....

There's a reason why Bush didn't give the go-ahead for the strike in his final days in office. That was a decision the serving President needs to make.
 
Was it in 82 when we supplied Israel with rockets launchers that have been said to have won the war alone while the opposition was being equipped with Russian junk?
 
JWerner2 said:
Was it in 82 when we supplied Israel with rockets launchers that have been said to have won the war alone while the opposition was being equipped with Russian junk?
Click to expand...

I believe you're talking about Afghanistan.
That's part of our foreign policy history where we're often blamed for having armed the Taliban against the invading Soviet armies.
 
No I think it was 82's Lebanese war. I know we gave up some gear in Afghanistan but we gave some stingers I think to Israel, might have been something prior to the stinger. For some reason I wanna say the weapons were to be used against Syria and Egypt do to the Soviets supplying them but I dont recall if they were involved or not. I know we gave them stuff during the 82 war but nothing was as significant as the stingers if I am correct.

Anyway I know we gave them some kind of hand helds that we just developed and it won them a war:D


My point is that if Israel attacks Iran and Iran has Russian technology I think it will play out just the same. Im not a fan of Israeli policies but I have to admit we help them out a lot and those guys can kick some ass for such a small nation.
 
JWerner2 said:
Was it in 82 when we supplied Israel with rockets launchers that have been said to have won the war alone while the opposition was being equipped with Russian junk?
Click to expand...



you know how to track a russian submarine?


follow the rusty wake.
 
Biblical prophecy states that Russia will attack Israel, and Israel will not be destroyed, but God will directly intervene.

There is no mention of the United States, however.

At all.
 
Lol

Rush is a big, fat, drug addicted blow hard bag of sh*t. He may be right about how long the eco-recovery will take. Of couse, the first thing we should do is string up all the "CEO's", Madoff's, and other "golden parachute" :q:q:q:q:q:q:qs and apply thier assets to the national defecit.
Biblical prophecy is also a bag of sh*t. All religion is superstitious sleight of hand so some jerk can try to control the behavior of his fellow man by coming up with bullcrap explanations of things man can't explain on his own.
Keep religion out of politics, government, schools and science and the world will be a much better place.
NOBODY has the right to force his superstitions on anybody else. If people kept their relationship with their "god" to themselves, we'd all be better off.
More war, death, and misery has been caused by religion than any other reason- be it islam, christianity, or flying spaghetti monsters.
 
fossten said:
Biblical prophecy states that Russia will attack Israel, and Israel will not be destroyed, but God will directly intervene.

There is no mention of the United States, however.

At all.
Click to expand...

Cant wait to see that happen.:rolleyes:
 
Kevin O'Connell said:
Rush is a big, fat, drug addicted blow hard bag of sh*t. He may be right about how long the eco-recovery will take. Of couse, the first thing we should do is string up all the "CEO's", Madoff's, and other "golden parachute" :q:q:q:q:q:q:qs and apply thier assets to the national defecit.
Biblical prophecy is also a bag of sh*t. All religion is superstitious sleight of hand so some jerk can try to control the behavior of his fellow man by coming up with bullcrap explanations of things man can't explain on his own.
Keep religion out of politics, government, schools and science and the world will be a much better place.
NOBODY has the right to force his superstitions on anybody else. If people kept their relationship with their "god" to themselves, we'd all be better off.
More war, death, and misery has been caused by religion than any other reason- be it islam, christianity, or flying spaghetti monsters.
Click to expand...
Channeling the very unfunny Al Franken? Ah well, everybody's got to have a hero. Who's next, Bill Maher?

How do you respond to the FACT that Obama ADMITTED IN HIS BOOK to using cocaine, even referring to it as "blow?" Compare that to Rush getting addicted to painkillers due to a bad back, the same thing that happened to Bret Favre.

I laugh out loud thinking about you standing before God one day and answering to Him for calling the Bible a bag of ****. Of course, that's not even true, you haven't ever read it, and you couldn't explain in any detail which parts of the Bible you don't agree with. You don't even know what the Bible is. You're just parroting something stupid you heard once.

Please explain how talking about one's religion is somehow 'forcing it on everybody else.'

Please cite specific examples where Christianity has caused war, death, and misery anywhere near the levels of godlessness and Islam.
 
Absolutely wrong.

Godless regimes such as Hitler's Nazi Germany, Stalin's Russia, Mao's China, and others are responsible for over 370 MILLION murders.

Want to try again?
 
That's a fascinating list. The violence associated with religion for 10 centuries.
So, let's compare the opposite. In the past century there have been about 100,000,000 people who were killed in the pursuit of communism.

USSR, 20 million deaths; China, 65 million deaths; Vietnam, 1 million deaths; North Korea, 2 million deaths; Cambodia, 2 million deaths; Eastern Europe, 1 million deaths; Latin America, 150,000 deaths; Africa, 1.7 million deaths; Afghanistan, 1.5 million deaths; the international communist movement and communist parties not in power, about 10,000 deaths.

Communism compiled a lengthy enemies list, which included political parties, clergy, intellectuals, shopkeepers, many ethnic groups, and other “socially dangerous elements.” Enemies were starved and worked to death; executed with bullets, shovels, and hammers; devoured by dogs; lit on fire; and made to kill one another for their capturers’ amusement.

More than bodies endured torture. Language was tortured: concentration camps became “re-education” camps. Minds were tortured: executions often followed “confessions” of guilt. The list of crimes punishable by death or imprisonment included criticizing the regime, owning a gun or radio transmitter, stealing a few ears of corn from the collective, and “taking part in commerce.”
Click to expand...

Amazon.com: The Black Book of Communism: Crimes, Terror, Repression: Stéphane Courtois, Nicolas Werth, Jean-Louis Panné, Andrzej Paczkowski, Karel Bartosek, Jean-Louis Margolin, Mark Kramer, Jonathan Murphy, Stephane Courtois, Jean-Louis Panne: Books
 
Only a moron or a propagandist says Hitler was a Christian. He wasn't. Of course, hrmwrm, the atheist, doesn't know what Christianity is. I draw a distinction between 'Christianity,' which is a very personal relationship with Christ, and 'organized religion.' Hrmwrm butted into the conversation and puked up a straw man argument. You, Kevin, specifically mentioned CHRISTIANITY as responsible for more deaths etc. etc. I offered counter evidence. You still haven't substantiated your claim. 'What he said' won't cut it unless you're ignorant or a coward.

But we're already discussing Christianity in another thread. Frankly, hrmwrm is not qualified to discuss it.

Do some research before you spew.

By the way, did you know Hitler was into the occult?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Members online

No members online now.
Total: 226 (members: 0, guests: 226)
Back
Top