No. That was a typical belittling comment. An attack is still an attack, no matter how sweet it's disguised. Just keeping it real.in the Charles Gibson interview did anyone feel they were watching a beauty pageant contestant - I thought that at any moment I was going to hear those telling words "and I want to work for world peace, and help all the starving children in Africa"?
Maybe a little, but I'll take that over:but in the Charles Gibson interview did anyone feel they were watching a beauty pageant contestant - I thought that at any moment I was going to hear those telling words "Charlie, and I want to work for world peace, and help all the starving children in Africa"?
Well, uh, Charlie, uuuhh, what I've, uh, consistently said, uhm, is that, erm, we need, uh, to get, uh, back, um, to the, uhm, issues that, uhm, so greatly, erhm, threaten this, ah, nation.
No double standard. I'm just pointing out that you are no different than what you sweetly lament against.Ah, but when this site slams Hillary- even posting photos of her in front of a sign that said COUNT with the 'O' covered up, and commenting on that 'she is one' - you didn't go and stand up for her- not one 'belittling comment' was uttered.
Is this a double standard?
I don't think the beauty pageant contest remark was at all inappropriate - there were times in the interview that her answers seemed quite 'young' and enthusiastic.
Point of order...that skit didn't actually mock Obama, it mocked the media.Well, first - I guess Mr Monster you didn't see the SNL with the hilarious skit of 'media members' lobbing softballs at Obama - it was hilarious. And, you know, after that the Republicans really started to hound the press (rightfully so) to start asking some hard questions - SNL did what it wanted to do - by poking fun (of both sides) they show us a reflection of ourselves in a different light, or from a different point of view.