ATrom
Dedicated LVC Member
Hah weird.. I never noticed that either
How do you like your rear end?
- Thread starter silverbucket
- Start date
silverbucket
Active LVC Member
I've been comparing rears for about a week now I like the gen2 tail lights because they flat. But i like the gen1 lights because they are a solid color.
mlara1129
Dedicated LVC Member
sell an organ and buy a set of GEN II LSE tails lol
On another note, the guys that have the WW spoiler, ever snapped any pics without the side pieces(just middle)?
On another note, the guys that have the WW spoiler, ever snapped any pics without the side pieces(just middle)?
mlara1129
Dedicated LVC Member
Yup.
oh uh...interesting...any other angles?
silverbucket
Active LVC Member
I like the WW spoiler too, but on black cars, idk how I feel about it on a silver car.
The 2000 model had a .32 drag coefficient according to this.
http://www.theautochannel.com/vehicles/new/reviews/2000/solo9949.html
Yeah, I knew that. I was looking for something that would show me the aero flow over the trunk lid so I could choose an effective spoiler. Thanks.
1MiC
Active LVC Member
i hate to say it.. but i think the gen 1 tail lights are down right ugly. They're just too big to me, almost a "bug eyes" kind of thing. And the fact that they're not flat bothers me too. Major improvment to the gen 2.
/endrant
/endrant
oh thats yours, i see the post now. yeah its not sitting correctly, but if its sealing i wouldnt mess with it. the only ppl who can tell are ppl who have an ls
pretty sure youre right about me being wrong this time
haha you better watch it buddy you might wake up one day and ill be sitting on your porch saying 'wheres your car dude?'
hite337
Hite Performance
Both of mine sit like that.
Mine doesn't seem to have that gap
Looks like it does to me. It's just the angle of the shot and the dark color; which "hides" the gap. Alex's shot is from a lower angle than lower than yours.
ATrom
Dedicated LVC Member
Ill trade you my two tones for yours 
Dealer. Tasca or Team Ford.
cammerfe
Dedicated LVC Member
That's actually negative camber, Ken. "De-cambered" would have no positive or negative camber.
Gee, Pec---
There must be camber first for it to be possible to remove camber or "DE-camber". When you remove camber, you will ultimately arrive at negative or "DE-camber"-ed. Forty years or more ago, when I was doing such things for road-racing, in-at-the-top was spoken of as de-cambered.
KS
Was hoping for used but a new one probably would not be of any real financial impact. Might as well call Monday and order one.