The 3.9L kills ignition coils like a serial killer? Since the 3.9 is based on the Jag 4.0, does that engine have the same issue or is it that when Ford decided to shorten the stroke, it royally screwed the engine up? Just curious.
Ford says that it is due "high voltage break down of the epoxy." This implies that they didn't use the correct epoxy formula. One would think this would be corrected by now.
A popular theory is that the issue is heat from the engine. This seems possible to me.
AFAIK, the S-type had the same coil issues. Before the S-type, Jaguar was famously unreliable. Even with the coil failures, it was probably an improvement.
Before the S-type, Jaguar was famously unreliable. Even with the coil failures, it was probably an improvement.
V
If the issue is heat, might leaving the coil covers off help?
not unless there is cool air flowing over them.
which there is not a whole lot of under the hood.
except for there is a system inside the motor and heads that cool it down, where as the headers can just radiate all of their heat into the engine bay, not to mention that system that cools the engine off, transfers that heat right to the air that is coming into the engine bay.It has to be better than nothing. More air/space to dissipate the heat. Vs trapping the heat so close to the coils, especially considering how close they are to hottest parts of the motor.
for starters, LS's have been known to leak water right onto the top of the motor. but many have left them off and have been fine.Unless I hear a good reason not to if/when I replace the coils I may consider giving it a shot.
except for there is a system inside the motor and heads that cool it down, where as the headers can just radiate all of their heat into the engine bay, not to mention that system that cools the engine off, transfers that heat right to the air that is coming into the engine bay.
i would also say that the area around the headers, is a lot hotter then the top of the heads, the heads have coolant to transfer heat away, the exhaust doesn't.
for starters, LS's have been known to leak water right onto the top of the motor. but many have left them off and have been fine.
for me, personally, I'm sticking with the assumption that the guy that designed the motor and put those there, knew more about it than I do...