December Lsotm Poll

DECEMBER LSOTM


  • Total voters
    18
  • Poll closed .

Lincoln Jealous

Dedicated LVC Member
Joined
Aug 8, 2009
Messages
3,118
Reaction score
17
Location
Location: Location: Location: Location: Location:
#1 sancho20

2002 lincoln lse

Exterior-Well i put a new bumper,fender ,and headlight on it Along with new wheels and licoln center caps,clear corners, i know the first 3 arent mods but it was wrecked so they were mods for me.Oh and i painted them also.
Wheels 19x8 adr x factor with 255/35/19 contisporttrac 3 tires
Blacked out chrome arond the windows.
Thats all folks. Everything else is stock for now...


82171829.jpg

73813963.jpg

33781170.jpg

86146624.jpg

63099229.jpg






#2 fbird18

2001 Lincoln LS-V8

Exterior:
- Gen 2 LSE Grille w/ color matched surround
- Color matched headlight bezels
- Cleared Turn Signals
- Gloss Black Painted B Pillars
- 2003 17" 8 spoke stock wheels
- 235/50/17 Hankook Ventus V4ES Tires
- 30% Window tint
- Removed license plate bracket, moved plate to lower grille
- Seemingly rare Pearl Blue Clearcoat Metallic factory paint color


Interior:
- Gen 2 "LINCOLN" door sill plates
- Pioneer AVIC D2 Navigation installed with Gen 2 navigation bezel painted to match gen 1 black interior
- "Lincoln" analog clock custom installed in ashtray
- Lincoln Star Logo floor mats


Engine:
- Well maintained

Suspension:
- Energy Suspension Swaybar Bushings

Brakes:
- Adaptive One Hybrid Ceramic brake pads


20116419.jpg

51680853.jpg

60359262.jpg

96293189.jpg

111jt.jpg





#3
jolinc01


2001 Lincoln LS V8
Exterior Gen 2 LSE bumper and grill
Color matched OEM side skirts, rear valance, and rear bumper chrom strip
5000K HIDS lows and fogs
Eibach springs
20% tint
Magnaflows

20784771.jpg

23654471.jpg

45319670.jpg

21810240.jpg
 
I know theres only 3 entries, there was 5 when SPSully was in charge of it, but he recently quit and didnt want to bother with the DEC. LSOTM, the other one missing is NYC, no offense NYC but you dont have the LS anymore so i thought its more fair with just current owners for this poll. any comments or questions for the next LSOTM, we should discuss this alittle since were going into the new year, and i would like to see this keep going. thanks
 
Should we wait for more entries then? I don't know if i should vote yet? But I know who I want to vote for ;)
 
Should we wait for more entries then? I don't know if i should vote yet? But I know who I want to vote for ;)

i really dont know, i would have waited for 5, but spsully had rushed to get this poll done, and people have asked why this poll hasnt taken place yet... so we could probably just vote now, thats why i said we should discuss this for the next months/year
 
What about rollins, did he win one already?
 
Uhh, you're missing two.

We had five.
1. SPSully
2. NYC LS8
3. Sancho20
4. fbird18
5. Jolinc01

Apparently, LJ decided to add rules to a contest that only had one rule. "LS of The Month". The title explain it all. He dropped SPSully because Sully posted that he was sick of certian LVC members. He didn't give names.:rolleyes: Then he booted NYC LS8. Because, he no longer owed the LS. Again only rule was "LS of The Month". It is an LS.:rolleyes:

I suggest a new poll. Including the all five that entered. If you want to discuss rules/guidelines. Do it for next months poll. Not in the middle of this months poll.

BTW LJ If you don't like it, let someone else run LSOTM.

BTW To the guys that are in the LSOTM. I am not trying to insult you in anyway. So I apologize if you think I am trying to disrespect you. I mean no disrespect to you guys.
 
If someone would like I will take this over. It is complete bull:q:q:q:q to start naming rules when there were no rules given. This not only makes the poll and contest complete rubbish to the owners that were discluded from the vote but also tarnishes any victory that the owners who were included may receive. I for one would not want to win on a month when two of the arguably best contestants weren't included in the contest for reasons that weren't disclosed before the contest.
 
We had five.
1. SPSully
2. NYC LS8
3. Sancho20
4. fbird18
5. Jolinc01

Apparently, LJ decided to add rules to a contest that only had one rule. "LS of The Month". The title explain it all. He dropped SPSully because Sully posted that he was sick of certian LVC members. He didn't give names.:rolleyes: Then he booted NYC LS8. Because, he no longer owed the LS. Again only rule was "LS of The Month". It is an LS.:rolleyes:

I suggest a new poll. Including the all five that entered. If you want to discuss rules/guidelines. Do it for next months poll. Not in the middle of this months poll.

BTW LJ If you don't like it, let someone else run LSOTM.

BTW To the guys that are in the LSOTM. I am not trying to insult you in anyway. So I apologize if you think I am trying to disrespect you. I mean no disrespect to you guys.

rollins if you had a problem with it, then you should have did this poll, i saw you whinning to your boyfriend sully to get this poll started and then he responded with i dont care i dont want to........ i dont know what your point is, but if other people want to do the polls, then thats fine to me, i dont really like posting all these pictures and setting up the thread and poll., but if i didnt do it for the past 3 months, then i doubt there would be a lsotm and also you wouldnt have won last month, ive been keeping this going for the past 3 months and this month it was sullys time to return and continue it... he didnt want to so thats why maybe this month was alittle different, if you check my last 2 months of lsotm i did everything the way the lvc members wanted the poll ran... lets see....hmm sully started it and now he quit and said hes not coming back to this site, but yeah lets honor the rules/guidelines he set for us? lol if he cared that much about lsotm he would have finished dec. and not "quit" in the middle lmao and thanks for telling me why i dropped sully lol was that really the reason rollins? do you have a secret crush on him you f@g where you check whos talking sh!t to him? and your right i "booted" nyc because he doesnt have a LS! lol hold on imma google LS and enter with the pics and mods i find... real intelligent you immigrant!:shifty:
 
If someone would like I will take this over. It is complete bull:q:q:q:q to start naming rules when there were no rules given. This not only makes the poll and contest complete rubbish to the owners that were discluded from the vote but also tarnishes any victory that the owners who were included may receive. I for one would not want to win on a month when two of the arguably best contestants weren't included in the contest for reasons that weren't disclosed before the contest.

actually..... if sully made the lsotm thread. and then says hes not doing it anymore and hes done with this site, why let the other 3 entries suffer? dont criticize the people who try to keep this forum positive.
 
actually..... if sully made the lsotm thread. and then says hes not doing it anymore and hes done with this site, why let the other 3 entries suffer? dont criticize the people who try to keep this forum positive.

First off let me start off by stating that I respect what you've done in keeping LSOTM going over the past few months. However, by taking out entries at your discretion you have totally ruined December's LSOTM. Correct me if I'm wrong but the point of this poll was for the people of LVC to choose their favorite LS of the one's that had entered, regardless of the circumstances after the entries were made. There were no rules stating that NYC couldn't enter his LS into the competition. If you wanted to make rules for the competition, you needed to state them before the entries were made. Many people felt that there may have been some cheating involved in the polling when you wont LSOTM but the rules weren't changed to show the entries until after the poll was completed.
 
First off let me start off by stating that I respect what you've done in keeping LSOTM going over the past few months. However, by taking out entries at your discretion you have totally ruined December's LSOTM. Correct me if I'm wrong but the point of this poll was for the people of LVC to choose their favorite LS of the one's that had entered, regardless of the circumstances after the entries were made. There were no rules stating that NYC couldn't enter his LS into the competition. If you wanted to make rules for the competition, you needed to state them before the entries were made. Many people felt that there may have been some cheating involved in the polling when you wont LSOTM but the rules weren't changed to show the entries until after the poll was completed.

no doubt tdub...i cant take the credit for ruining the dec. lsotm....spsully said he was going to do the entries. he quit before the poll was created. when i created the poll i took spsully out because "i guess it was my opinion" but why should he be in a poll where he said he would not return too? lsotm's take alittle work and time to put to post the entries and the pictures. having everyone believe he was going to take care of it and then quit, i still dont understand why he would have been allowed? maybe if he won, he would hopefully come back to us.... :( and nyc... no disrespect to him, but im not going to make a poll with people on it that dont even exist(anymore) you cant just take pictures of a ls and enter when someone else owns the car, seems to me thats what briandye did and everyone was confused by why hes adding pictures of other owners LS, originally LSOTM was created by xxdjdinot1989xx and the rule"s" were Post a pic of your car and little info on it. Voting will start after the first 5 rides enter. Voting will take place in a different thread. and since you are speaking behalf of the "many people that felt that there may have been some cheating involved in the polling when you wont LSOTM but the rules weren't changed to show the entries until after the poll was completed" i dont get your point, people can hate, or congratulate. the reason why votes are shown now is to get rid of any suspicion about the votes, i didnt 100% agree with it, but it proves a fair poll. i feel that the rules were certain at the time spsully started the entries thread, and havent changed since
 
SPSully and NYC are both good sh*t.

It is a shame that so much work is going in to keeping their rides out of the voting.

:repost:
 
I agree with keeping the original ls' and specify rules for next month not in the middle of one. And its not the same if you're only competing with 2 other ls'. 5 entrees, They will come, last minute sometimes but they will come. NYC LS8's ls, when we look at that ls we all know who's ls that is, it may be in someone else name now but that is still NYC LS8's ls. Plus he is still around so its not like he sold and bailed on LVC. Sully ls, that I dont know, he just left out of no where but I still say keep the original ls' and update the rules for next or whatever you want to call it.
 
I agree with keeping the original ls' and specify rules for next month not in the middle of one. And its not the same if you're only competing with 2 other ls'. 5 entrees, They will come, last minute sometimes but they will come. NYC LS8's ls, when we look at that ls we all know who's ls that is, it may be in someone else name now but that is still NYC LS8's ls. Plus he is still around so its not like he sold and bailed on LVC. Sully ls, that I dont know, he just left out of no where but I still say keep the original ls' and update the rules for next or whatever you want to call it.

well if everyone agrees, then obviously i would be nice enough to post a new thread with 5, sorry for getting everyones panties in a bunch:p
 
no doubt tdub...i cant take the credit for ruining the dec. lsotm....spsully said he was going to do the entries. he quit before the poll was created. when i created the poll i took spsully out because "i guess it was my opinion" but why should he be in a poll where he said he would not return too? lsotm's take alittle work and time to put to post the entries and the pictures. having everyone believe he was going to take care of it and then quit, i still dont understand why he would have been allowed? maybe if he won, he would hopefully come back to us.... :( and nyc... no disrespect to him, but im not going to make a poll with people on it that dont even exist(anymore) you cant just take pictures of a ls and enter when someone else owns the car, seems to me thats what briandye did and everyone was confused by why hes adding pictures of other owners LS, originally LSOTM was created by xxdjdinot1989xx and the rule"s" were Post a pic of your car and little info on it. Voting will start after the first 5 rides enter. Voting will take place in a different thread. and since you are speaking behalf of the "many people that felt that there may have been some cheating involved in the polling when you wont LSOTM but the rules weren't changed to show the entries until after the poll was completed" i dont get your point, people can hate, or congratulate. the reason why votes are shown now is to get rid of any suspicion about the votes, i didnt 100% agree with it, but it proves a fair poll. i feel that the rules were certain at the time spsully started the entries thread, and havent changed since

My reasoning for bringing up when you won LSOTM is that a lot of people felt that you may have cheated; whether the accusations were granted or not. At that point your car could very easily been taken out at the poll owner's discretion. However, instead the poll was continued, you ended up winning, and changes were made to the polling system after the poll was finished. How would you have felt if you had been taken out of the poll for something that had not been specified before you entered? How do you think the winner of the poll would have felt had they "won" after you had been disqualified? Regardless of whether they own it now or have decided to leave the site or not, NYC's and Sully's LS's are their LS's, and both decided to enter this month's poll. We all know damn well that NYC isn't brian and didn't decide to go take a picture of some random LS and call it his own. He has been a long time contributing member to this site, and just because he decided to upgrade from his LS he should not be punished for it. If he had entered earlier in the year before selling his LS would you feel differently? Let the people of LVC decide whether or not Sully deserves to win this competition after his remarks about the site. After all, if he remains true to his statements, he won't be entering again.
 
rollins if you had a problem with it, then you should have did this poll, i saw you whinning to your boyfriend sully to get this poll started and then he responded with i dont care i dont want to........ i dont know what your point is, but if other people want to do the polls, then thats fine to me, i dont really like posting all these pictures and setting up the thread and poll., but if i didnt do it for the past 3 months, then i doubt there would be a lsotm and also you wouldnt have won last month, ive been keeping this going for the past 3 months and this month it was sullys time to return and continue it... he didnt want to so thats why maybe this month was alittle different, if you check my last 2 months of lsotm i did everything the way the lvc members wanted the poll ran... lets see....hmm sully started it and now he quit and said hes not coming back to this site, but yeah lets honor the rules/guidelines he set for us? lol if he cared that much about lsotm he would have finished dec. and not "quit" in the middle lmao and thanks for telling me why i dropped sully lol was that really the reason rollins? do you have a secret crush on him you f@g where you check whos talking sh!t to him? and your right i "booted" nyc because he doesnt have a LS! lol hold on imma google LS and enter with the pics and mods i find... real intelligent you immigrant!:shifty:

I didn't care who did the "LSOTM". Whether it was Sully, Pektel, or you. I didn't want to see a cool idea fade away. It was a fun thing for us LS members to do. Not to mention, it could have developed into a cool calender for us to buy. I just wanted to show interested in it. So one of you three would continue it.

If I had been asked, I would have done. You want to make it personal fine by me. I didn't insult you. Call you names. Or question your sexuality. So who is the intelligent one now? I posted what all of us were thinking. As TDUB, esalomander, and Alex7 have posted. So I am not the only member questioning you about it.

The way I see it. You need to apologize for your ignoramt post towards me. So be a man and admit you crossed the line.

BTW IF its such a problem for you, I will start running "LSOTM". There your problem is now mine. I will gladly do it.
 
I was winning this poll dammit... jj i voted for nycls8 in the other poll ,he always had my favorite ls on here..
 

Members online

No members online now.
Back
Top