Bump The Drama Vote OBAMA!!!!

Status
Not open for further replies.
Truth Hurts

,,,,,,,,,,DO I HAVE THIS STRAIGHT?

HIS FATHER WAS A BLACK AFRICAN MUSLIM FROM KENYA
WE HAVE SEEN PICTURES OF HIS AFRICAN FAMILY.

HIS MOTHER WAS A WHITE AMERICAN ATHEIST FROM KANSAS
WHERE ARE THE PICTURES OF HIS AMERICAN FAMILY?

HIS FATHER DESERTED HIS MOTHER WHEN HE WAS ONLY TWO YEARS OLD AND WENT BACK TO AFRICA BY WAY OF HARVARD UNIVERSITY HOW? WAS HIS FATHER WEALTHY?

HIS MOTHER MARRIED AN INDONESIAN MUSLIM AND THEN MOVED TO JAKARTA WHERE HE WAS ENROLLED IN A MUSLIM SCHOOL .

WHEN HE REACHED HIGH SCHOOL AGE HIS MOTHER SENT HIM TO HAWAII TO BE WITH HIS WHITE GRANDPARENTS AND HE WAS PUT INTO AN EXPENSIVE PRIVATE SCHOOL. HE LATER WENT TO HARVARD UNIVERSITY HOW? WERE HIS GRANDPARENTS RICH?

HE LIVES IN A $1.4 MILLION HOUSE OBTAINED THROUGH A DEAL WITH A WEALTHY FUNDRAISER. HOW?

HE 'WORKED' AS A CIVIL RIGHTS ACTIVIST IN CHICAGO . HE HAS NEVER HELD A PRODUCTIVE JOB OR RECEIVED A PAY CHECK THAT WAS NOT GOVERNMENT-FUNDED AND/OR TAYPAYER SUPPORTED.

THE PRESIDENCY IS NOT A CIVIL RIGHTS POSITION, NOR IS IT SUBJECT TO AFFIRMATIVE ACTION SET ASIDES; ON-THE-JOB TRAINING WON'T CUT IT.

HE ENTERED POLITICS AT THE STATE LEVEL AND THEN THE NATIONAL LEVEL WHERE HE HAS MINIMAL EXPERIENCE.

HE IS PROUD OF HIS 'AFRICAN HERITAGE' (A FATHER WHO GOT A WHITE GIRL PREGNANT AND DESERTED HER).

WHERE IS THE PRIDE IN HIS 'WHITE HERITAGE'? (A MOTHER WHO FLAUNTED CONVENTION AND DID NOT BELIEVE IN GOD).

SOME MIGHT THINK THERE WAS NOT MUCH TO BE PROUD OF EITHER WAY.

HE BELONGS, AND HAS BELONGED FOR OVER 20 YEARS, TO AN 'AFRO-CENTRIC' CHURCH IN CHICAGO THAT HATES WHITES, HATES JEWS, AND BLAMES AMERICA FOR ALL THE WORLD'S PERCEIVED FAULTS. (INCLUDING CREATING THE AIDs VIRUS IN ORDER TO INFLICT IT ON AFRICANS).

HE REPEATEDLY WHITEWASHES THE PASTOR, HIS CHURCH AND THE MEMBERS WHO CHEERED AFTER HEARING VITRIOLIC TIRADES AGAINST AMERICA

HE COULD NOT CONFRONT HIS PASTOR BUT HE WANTS US TO BELIEVE HE CAN CONFRONT NORTH KOREA AND IRAN ?
YEAH RIGHT ! !

DURING HIS VERY BRIEF TIME IN THE UNITED STATES SENATE HE HAS MANAGED TO AMASS THE NUMBER ONE ULTRA LIBERAL VOTING RECORD OUT OF THE ONE HUNDRED MEMBERS.

HE HAS VOTED CONSISTENTLY FOR BIGGER GOVERNMENT AND HIGHER TAXES. HE HAS VOTED FOR BIG ENTITLEMENTS AND LEGISLATION THAT WOULD SEVERELY CURTAIL AMERICA 'S ABILITY TO FIGHT TERRORISM AND TO PROTECT OUR BORDERS AND OUR NATIONAL INTERESTS AROUND THE WORLD.

BUT, HE IS A GOOD ORATOR. ISN'T THAT A COMFORT?

YEAH, I THINK I SEE HOW WELL HE COULD UNITE THE COUNTRY.

I THINK THE TRUTH IS THAT HE HOPES NO ONE WILL PUT THE PIECES TOGETHER.

LADIES AND GENTLEMEN, LET ME INTRODUCE YOU TO OUR NEW CHIEF PILOT. HE HAS NEVER FLOWN AN AIRPLANE, IN FACT HE HAS NEVER EVEN SAT IN THE COCKPIT, BUT HE SAYS HE HAS RIDDEN ON PLANES BEFORE. WE ARE SURE HE WILL GUIDE US SAFELY THROUGH THE STORMS WE MAY ENCOUNTER ON THIS FLIGHT.

PEOPLE WHAT ARE YOU THINKING? HAVE YOU NEVER HEARD THE STORY ABOUT THE WOLF HIDING IN SHEEP'S CLOTHING SO HE CAN DESTROY THEM FROM WITH-IN ? THE HAND WRITING IS ON THE WALL, DO YOU NOT HAVE EYES TO SEE IT ?

THINK LONG AND HARD BEFORE YOU VOTE FOR THIS GUY! CONSIDER YOUR KIDS & GRANDKIDS
THEIR FUTURE IS IN OUR VOTING HANDS.
 
,,,,,,,,,,DO I HAVE THIS STRAIGHT?

HIS FATHER WAS A BLACK AFRICAN MUSLIM FROM KENYA
WE HAVE SEEN PICTURES OF HIS AFRICAN FAMILY.

HIS MOTHER WAS A WHITE AMERICAN ATHEIST FROM KANSAS
WHERE ARE THE PICTURES OF HIS AMERICAN FAMILY?

HIS FATHER DESERTED HIS MOTHER WHEN HE WAS ONLY TWO YEARS OLD AND WENT BACK TO AFRICA BY WAY OF HARVARD UNIVERSITY HOW? WAS HIS FATHER WEALTHY?

HIS MOTHER MARRIED AN INDONESIAN MUSLIM AND THEN MOVED TO JAKARTA WHERE HE WAS ENROLLED IN A MUSLIM SCHOOL .

WHEN HE REACHED HIGH SCHOOL AGE HIS MOTHER SENT HIM TO HAWAII TO BE WITH HIS WHITE GRANDPARENTS AND HE WAS PUT INTO AN EXPENSIVE PRIVATE SCHOOL. HE LATER WENT TO HARVARD UNIVERSITY HOW? WERE HIS GRANDPARENTS RICH?

HE LIVES IN A $1.4 MILLION HOUSE OBTAINED THROUGH A DEAL WITH A WEALTHY FUNDRAISER. HOW?

HE 'WORKED' AS A CIVIL RIGHTS ACTIVIST IN CHICAGO . HE HAS NEVER HELD A PRODUCTIVE JOB OR RECEIVED A PAY CHECK THAT WAS NOT GOVERNMENT-FUNDED AND/OR TAYPAYER SUPPORTED.

THE PRESIDENCY IS NOT A CIVIL RIGHTS POSITION, NOR IS IT SUBJECT TO AFFIRMATIVE ACTION SET ASIDES; ON-THE-JOB TRAINING WON'T CUT IT.

HE ENTERED POLITICS AT THE STATE LEVEL AND THEN THE NATIONAL LEVEL WHERE HE HAS MINIMAL EXPERIENCE.

HE IS PROUD OF HIS 'AFRICAN HERITAGE' (A FATHER WHO GOT A WHITE GIRL PREGNANT AND DESERTED HER).

WHERE IS THE PRIDE IN HIS 'WHITE HERITAGE'? (A MOTHER WHO FLAUNTED CONVENTION AND DID NOT BELIEVE IN GOD).

SOME MIGHT THINK THERE WAS NOT MUCH TO BE PROUD OF EITHER WAY.

HE BELONGS, AND HAS BELONGED FOR OVER 20 YEARS, TO AN 'AFRO-CENTRIC' CHURCH IN CHICAGO THAT HATES WHITES, HATES JEWS, AND BLAMES AMERICA FOR ALL THE WORLD'S PERCEIVED FAULTS. (INCLUDING CREATING THE AIDs VIRUS IN ORDER TO INFLICT IT ON AFRICANS).

HE REPEATEDLY WHITEWASHES THE PASTOR, HIS CHURCH AND THE MEMBERS WHO CHEERED AFTER HEARING VITRIOLIC TIRADES AGAINST AMERICA

HE COULD NOT CONFRONT HIS PASTOR BUT HE WANTS US TO BELIEVE HE CAN CONFRONT NORTH KOREA AND IRAN ?
YEAH RIGHT ! !

DURING HIS VERY BRIEF TIME IN THE UNITED STATES SENATE HE HAS MANAGED TO AMASS THE NUMBER ONE ULTRA LIBERAL VOTING RECORD OUT OF THE ONE HUNDRED MEMBERS.

HE HAS VOTED CONSISTENTLY FOR BIGGER GOVERNMENT AND HIGHER TAXES. HE HAS VOTED FOR BIG ENTITLEMENTS AND LEGISLATION THAT WOULD SEVERELY CURTAIL AMERICA 'S ABILITY TO FIGHT TERRORISM AND TO PROTECT OUR BORDERS AND OUR NATIONAL INTERESTS AROUND THE WORLD.

BUT, HE IS A GOOD ORATOR. ISN'T THAT A COMFORT?

YEAH, I THINK I SEE HOW WELL HE COULD UNITE THE COUNTRY.

I THINK THE TRUTH IS THAT HE HOPES NO ONE WILL PUT THE PIECES TOGETHER.

LADIES AND GENTLEMEN, LET ME INTRODUCE YOU TO OUR NEW CHIEF PILOT. HE HAS NEVER FLOWN AN AIRPLANE, IN FACT HE HAS NEVER EVEN SAT IN THE COCKPIT, BUT HE SAYS HE HAS RIDDEN ON PLANES BEFORE. WE ARE SURE HE WILL GUIDE US SAFELY THROUGH THE STORMS WE MAY ENCOUNTER ON THIS FLIGHT.

PEOPLE WHAT ARE YOU THINKING? HAVE YOU NEVER HEARD THE STORY ABOUT THE WOLF HIDING IN SHEEP'S CLOTHING SO HE CAN DESTROY THEM FROM WITH-IN ? THE HAND WRITING IS ON THE WALL, DO YOU NOT HAVE EYES TO SEE IT ?

THINK LONG AND HARD BEFORE YOU VOTE FOR THIS GUY! CONSIDER YOUR KIDS & GRANDKIDS
THEIR FUTURE IS IN OUR VOTING HANDS.



Welcome to our new President and Vice President Obama and Biden.
 
What must it feel like?

To carry the hopes and dreams of an entire race of people on your shoulders?






As much as I hate to say it, I know beyond a doubt that the next four weeks are going to be nasty. He's leading, and there are people who simply cannot stomach the idea of his beautiful family living in the White House. There will be smears, all sorts of slander and lies, the likes of which you've probably rarely seen. So y'all, we got to pray for this man. And please . . . make sure you VOTE!!! Vote early if you can!

Obama.JPG
 
yes i watch this closely not only the debate but his town hall meetings as well.
How do you do this? Town hall meetings aren't shown on national TV. Do you follow him on his campaign trail, looking up from your car as his jet flies overhead, and try to keep up? Or do you have the money to fly from city to city and attend each meeting?

Enquiring minds want to know.

Also, if you watched the debate closely then you would have noticed Obama lying through his teeth about Ayers, his so called tax cuts, and the born alive bill.

Or did it pass right over your head?
 
How do you do this? Town hall meetings aren't shown on national TV. Do you follow him on his campaign trail, looking up from your car as his jet flies overhead, and try to keep up? Or do you have the money to fly from city to city and attend each meeting?

Enquiring minds want to know.

Also, if you watched the debate closely then you would have noticed Obama lying through his teeth about Ayers, his so called tax cuts, and the born alive bill.

Or did it pass right over your head?

Town hall meeting are video taped and distributed by either fans or people who want to share what happened in the meeting. I have seen videos.
And as far as the debate lastnight Obama clearly set the record straight about Ayers and to prove a point directly after the debate news reporter and others on the stage of the shows made the same remark from station to station about how he clearly set the record straight about the accusation with him and Ayers.

As for the tax cuts his are waaayyyyy better than McCains mess. If you were paying close attention McCains proposal for tax cuts still left the middle class struggling while big business still made out like fat rats.
On the abortion issue Obama once again put McCain in his place. He put the decision making of the pregnant mother to be in her hands and her family unless it was to late to abort the child. And in doing so also included a concern on the part of the pregnant mothers health where as McCain says thats unexceptable.

The point is McCain doesnt really care about womens rights because if he did he wouldnt have left a wife that waited for him all thru his captive years only for him to come home to a once beautiful woman that had been horribly disfigured because of an accident. Only to be left becasue she wasnt pretty anymore. No on has said anything about these major facts. As well as many more.
 
I think I've figured out why Obama supporters like him so much...

It's like this. A lot of people are just plain lazy. They believe they are ENTITLED to be supported by the government. They are not ambitious enough to go out there and start their own business and/or make more money. Why should they, when there are all these wonderful Government programs that give them money? And why should they not vote for Obama, especially if they will get more money, especially from those rich ba$tard$ that "have too much money"? Never mind that those "rich ba$tard$" got off their arses and went out into the real world and made something of themselves... Right?

What... what's Obama's plan called? It's coming to me... ah, yes!

SOCIALISM!
 
Anybody else notice the Obama campaign signs that say "obama/biden when you drive by it looks like it says OBAMA BINLADEN?

spelling bad but point made...
 
I think I've figured out why Obama supporters like him so much...

It's like this. A lot of people are just plain lazy. They believe they are ENTITLED to be supported by the government. They are not ambitious enough to go out there and start their own business and/or make more money. Why should they, when there are all these wonderful Government programs that give them money? And why should they not vote for Obama, especially if they will get more money, especially from those rich ba$tard$ that "have too much money"? Never mind that those "rich ba$tard$" got off their arses and went out into the real world and made something of themselves... Right?

What... what's Obama's plan called? It's coming to me... ah, yes!

SOCIALISM!

So you've bought into McSame's claim that Obama is "spreading the wealth" in a BAD way? LOL. Don't forget that McCain is ALSO spreading the wealth, he's taking from the poor and middle class and giving to the rich corporations / investors just as BuSh has for the last 8 years. And what does the middle class get in return? Job losses, more tax burden from this bail-out, depreciated wages and a kick in the arse. Gee, THANKS. I don't care what you call it and I don't know who raised you, but around these parts, taking from the poor and giving to the rich is MORALLY WRONG. WWJD? Jesus wouldn't stand for it!
 
So you've bought into McSame's claim that Obama is "spreading the wealth" in a BAD way? LOL. Don't forget that McCain is ALSO spreading the wealth, he's taking from the poor and middle class and giving to the rich corporations / investors just as BuSh has for the last 8 years. And what does the middle class get in return? Job losses, more tax burden from this bail-out, depreciated wages and a kick in the arse. Gee, THANKS. I don't care what you call it and I don't know who raised you, but around these parts, taking from the poor and giving to the rich is MORALLY WRONG. WWJD? Jesus wouldn't stand for it!


Let's not forget The Keaton 5 where as McSame allowed rich guys to steal money and he also recieved money from them as well and him and his family were flown all over, even the baby sitter. But you don't hear anyone mentioning about that do you. Now why would i want to elect anyone in office who was involved in a 1990 Bail out because of the same crap we are dealing with today. Do you remember that Bail Out i think it was like 34.6 Billion dollars or something around that figure but it was in the billions.
 
So you've bought into McSame's claim that Obama is "spreading the wealth" in a BAD way? LOL. Don't forget that McCain is ALSO spreading the wealth, he's taking from the poor and middle class and giving to the rich corporations / investors just as BuSh has for the last 8 years. And what does the middle class get in return? Job losses, more tax burden from this bail-out, depreciated wages and a kick in the arse. Gee, THANKS. I don't care what you call it and I don't know who raised you, but around these parts, taking from the poor and giving to the rich is MORALLY WRONG. WWJD? Jesus wouldn't stand for it!
Wow. You tie with Joey for "stupidest post ever."

Exactly how does McCain's plan take from the poor, considering it doesn't tax them?

Please show me, in order, any country that was taxed into prosperity, and one single poor person that got rich as a result of redistribution of wealth via taxes.
 
and one single poor person that got rich as a result of redistribution of wealth via taxes.
Be careful there Foss. They'll come up with someone who used their stimulus check to buy beer, cigs and some lottery tickets. I sure some poor sap won a lottery somewhere buying lotto tickets provided by a 'rich' person.
 
Let's not forget The Keaton 5...
Family-Ties-tv-03.jpg



where as McSame allowed rich guys to steal money and he also recieved money from them as well and him and his family were flown all over, even the baby sitter. But you don't hear anyone mentioning about that do you. Now why would i want to elect anyone in office who was involved in a 1990 Bail out because of the same crap we are dealing with today. Do you remember that Bail Out i think it was like 34.6 Billion dollars or something around that figure but it was in the billions.

Please.... explain to us what the Keating Five was all about.
Educate us all. I'm sure you're insight would be priceless.
 
...I can't wait around for you to finish your drink and respond, so I'll just continue.

Let's not forget The Keaton 5
As mentioned before, the scandal involved a man named Charles Keating.

where as McSame allowed rich guys to steal money
No.

he also recieved money from them as well and him and his family were flown all over, even the baby sitter. But you don't hear anyone mentioning about that do you.
That's because he was cleared of all charges. The judgment he displayed at the time was suspect, but he did nothing illegal. Perhaps you've forgotten (or the post you're probably paraphrasing forgot to include) was the fact that the Keating Five scandal was a DEMOCRAT scandal. McCain, though obviously clear of any illegality, was pulled into that scandal by the Democrat leadership in congress to prevent the media from being able to report the scandal as a Democrat one.

Astronaut John Glenn. D-OH
Alan Cranston. D-Ca
Dennis DeConcini. D-AZ
Donald W. Riegle D-MI



Now why would i want to elect anyone in office who was involved in a 1990 Bail out because of the same crap we are dealing with today. Do you remember that Bail Out i think it was like 34.6 Billion dollars or something around that figure but it was in the billions.
You are so bad at this, I get embarrassed for you.
It wasn't 34.6 Billion dollars, it was 3.4 Billion dollars.
That's a lot of money, but it's considerably less than $34.6B.

But you make an interesting point.
The Keating Five scandal and the S&L failure took place in the late 80s. The Democrats had taken complete control of both houses of the Congress under a Republican President. The Keating 5 scandal was a Democrat scandal.

Why are you blaming one Congressman for a failure while supporting the very same party and circumstances the preceded the last two failures now? Even using your logic, that's horribly flawed thinking.
 
Hey Stinc---

Town hall meeting are video taped and distributed by either fans or people who want to share what happened in the meeting. I have seen videos.
And as far as the debate lastnight Obama clearly set the record straight about Ayers and to prove a point directly after the debate news reporter and others on the stage of the shows made the same remark from station to station about how he clearly set the record straight about the accusation with him and Ayers.

I'm really glad that Osa--(oops) Obama cleared up his relationship with Ayers with that explanation. I'm reminded of the kid denying that he'd just 'loaded' his pants. The only problem was the 'stinc'. If it smells like a turd, the chances are that it's an unrepentant former terrorist bomber who's realized he can use the democrat machine in Chicago to provide refuge at the local secular progressive university. The same person that said RECENTLY that he wished he'd done more bombings.

We're still waiting for the same sort of explanation regarding his associations with Ferrikhan, The priest nit-wit, and the screaming G-- D--- America so-called preacher by whom he was mentored for more than 20 years---but never once heard from him an un-American word.
KS
 
...I can't wait around for you to finish your drink and respond, so I'll just continue.


As mentioned before, the scandal involved a man named Charles Keating.


No.


That's because he was cleared of all charges. The judgment he displayed at the time was suspect, but he did nothing illegal. Perhaps you've forgotten (or the post you're probably paraphrasing forgot to include) was the fact that the Keating Five scandal was a DEMOCRAT scandal. McCain, though obviously clear of any illegality, was pulled into that scandal by the Democrat leadership in congress to prevent the media from being able to report the scandal as a Democrat one.

Astronaut John Glenn. D-OH
Alan Cranston. D-Ca
Dennis DeConcini. D-AZ
Donald W. Riegle D-MI




You are so bad at this, I get embarrassed for you.
It wasn't 34.6 Billion dollars, it was 3.4 Billion dollars.
That's a lot of money, but it's considerably less than $34.6B.

But you make an interesting point.
The Keating Five scandal and the S&L failure took place in the late 80s. The Democrats had taken complete control of both houses of the Congress under a Republican President. The Keating 5 scandal was a Democrat scandal.

Why are you blaming one Congressman for a failure while supporting the very same party and circumstances the preceded the last two failures now? Even using your logic, that's horribly flawed thinking.

http://www.keatingeconomics.com/

The current economic crisis demands that we understand John McCain's attitudes about economic oversight and corporate influence in federal regulation. Nothing illustrates the danger of his approach more clearly than his central role in the savings and loan scandal of the late '80s and early '90s.
John McCain was accused of improperly aiding his political patron, Charles Keating, chairman of the Lincoln Savings and Loan Association. The bipartisan Senate Ethics Committee launched investigations and formally reprimanded Senator McCain for his role in the scandal. Today, John McCain is the only major party presidential nominee in US history to have been rebuked, censured or otherwise admonished after a Congressional ethics investigation.
At the heart of the scandal was Keating's Lincoln Savings and Loan Association, which took advantage of deregulation in the 1980s to make risky investments with its depositors' money. McCain intervened on behalf of Charles Keating with federal regulators tasked with preventing banking fraud, and championed legislation to delay regulation of the savings and loan industry -- actions that allowed Keating to continue his fraud at an incredible cost to taxpayers.
When the savings and loan industry collapsed, Keating's failed company put taxpayers on the hook for $3.4 billion and more than 20,000 Americans lost their savings. John McCain was reprimanded by the bipartisan Senate Ethics Committee, but the ultimate cost of the crisis to American taxpayers reached more than $120 billion.
The Keating scandal is eerily similar to today's credit crisis, where a lack of regulation and cozy relationships between the financial industry and Congress has allowed banks to make risky loans and profit by bending the rules. And in both cases, John McCain's judgment and values have placed him on the wrong side of history.


There ya go Calabrio happy now
 

I've responded already.
This is the part of the discussion where you address the specific points and challenges I made. You don't simply restate the topic.


There ya go Calabrio happy now
No, we've demonstrated that I know what the Keating Five scandal was. You're the one who didn't. Unfortunately, you've failed to respond to points I made. You didn't even demonstrate that you personally understand the subject.

Why don't you go back and respond to my reply, I see no reason to bother re-typing it.
http://www.lincolnvscadillac.com/showpost.php?p=437492&postcount=42
 
Here's another quote:
"After reviewing my report, the committee voted on October 23, 1990, to hold a public adjudicatory fact-finding hearing in the matter as to all five senators. This was perhaps the first time the recommendation of a special counsel not to charge a senator was rejected. This was pure politics as the Democrats on the committee did not want to cut McCain loose so that only Democrats would remain in the proceedings. If Senator McCain was not going to be cut loose, in retaliation the Republicans were going to keep Senator Glenn in the proceedings. McCain was the victim of politics, and poor Glenn was held captive to the decision on McCain. So much for nonpartisanship." -- Democratic Keating Investigation Counsel Robert Bennett

http://www.standardnewswire.com/news/3813449.html
 
Wow. buzzzzztttt buzzzztt!

Damn toilet must be backed up again. SOMEBODY CALL JOE THE PLUMBER, QUICK!!

Exactly how does McCain's plan take from the poor, considering it doesn't tax them?

Well, according to McCain, anyone making less than $5,000,000 / year must be "poor", so your claim is false to begin with. But besides that, I was referring to the middle class.

Please show me, in order, any country that was taxed into prosperity,
Gee, the US was pretty prosperous in the '90s and taxes went up.

and one single poor person that got rich as a result of redistribution of wealth via taxes.

Your strawman is false. Nobody is trying to "make the poor rich" nor has anyone promised that that would be the result of Obama's tax plan. The goal is to improve the quality of life of everyone, not just the rich. A small tax break (say $5000) for 95% of the population is going to improve the quality of life for MANY more people and to a MUCH GREATER EXTENT than a $200,000 tax break to the few who make 10s of $millions.

Did you NOT appreciate that "economic stimulus check" you received a few months ago? SSDD dude, except BuSh handed it out. If you think giving the middle class a break is so bad, I expect you to sent that check back to the IRS?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Members online

No members online now.
Back
Top