Last edited by a moderator:
What really happened at the Pentagon on 9/11
- Thread starter Joeychgo
- Start date
JoeyLincolnMK8
Dedicated LVC Member
joey, link does not work
damn, worked last night
Pepsi2185
LVC Mafia Henchman
- Joined
- Mar 30, 2004
- Messages
- 573
- Reaction score
- 1
give us a summary joey, what was it about?
Hopefully, it'll come back soon....... It makes a case to question if a plane actually flew into the pentagon, explaining how there was no wreckage of a plan or bodies from the plane found --- suggesting a missile hit the pentagon instead.
CaptainZilog
Turbo-riffic!
That story is pure fiction. It belongs on an episode of the X-files or something.
http://www.snopes.com/rumors/pentagon.htm
http://www.snopes.com/rumors/pentagon.htm
Kbob said:
Would you quit wrecking my fun please!!!!!!!!!!!!
J/K ROFL
:I with Kbob that story is :bsflag: for an F-16 to fire on the Pentagon is unthimkable, all this story is a theory nothing more. What would the current administration have to gain by such an act, did anyone see a missle strike the Pentagon there were people outside the place and no one has reported seeing a missle strike the Pentagon. At this point there are nothing but theories.
S
Skuuter
Guest
Pure poppycock!
I've seen several of these sites that purport to know what "really happened". What none of them take into account is the fact that an aluminum skinned plane travelling over 600 mph would be almost vaporized on impact with a building as fortified as the Pentagon. Remember this section had just recently been upgraded against explosions like the one in Oklahoma City.
Consider, too, the WTC towers. Did you see any recognizable part of an airplane emerge from the other side of the impacts? Hitting the the Pentagon versus the WTC towers is comparable to a car being driven into a glass windowed office building versus being driven into reinforced concrete bridge abutment. BIG difference!
I've seen several of these sites that purport to know what "really happened". What none of them take into account is the fact that an aluminum skinned plane travelling over 600 mph would be almost vaporized on impact with a building as fortified as the Pentagon. Remember this section had just recently been upgraded against explosions like the one in Oklahoma City.
Consider, too, the WTC towers. Did you see any recognizable part of an airplane emerge from the other side of the impacts? Hitting the the Pentagon versus the WTC towers is comparable to a car being driven into a glass windowed office building versus being driven into reinforced concrete bridge abutment. BIG difference!
poppycock?
92 Arizona Towncar
Active LVC Member
poppycock... :bash:
what happened to your sig NOW????
CaptainZilog
Turbo-riffic!
Ah damnit. I hate being taken by these sites. You know what it does, is it f's with your ability to recognize real threats from false ones. Sorry guys. Stupid frog bastards.
Pepsi2185
LVC Mafia Henchman
- Joined
- Mar 30, 2004
- Messages
- 573
- Reaction score
- 1
hey bevis he just said . . . . . .
ONEBADMK8
Dedicated LVC Member
The plane was doing 350 not 600 mph when it hit the Pentagon.
MarkOfDeath
Dedicated LVC Member
theres a red mark viii in the video
MarkOfDeath
Dedicated LVC Member
MarkOfDeath said:
ONEBADMK8
Dedicated LVC Member
What is sorta interesting is WHY these survalliance tapes have not been released, just to shut up the ney sayers at least? That is strange as hell.
MarkOfDeath said:
Your a die hard fan, no question there.
MarkOfDeath
Dedicated LVC Member
any media time the lincoln gets is good time, I was watching fox news and they played a clip from a camera at a stop light that records people who blow them and it showed a black second gen speeding thru.
Last edited by a moderator: