Question about the 16x7 5 spokes..

Missing Linc'

Dedicated LVC Member
Joined
Dec 18, 2008
Messages
2,243
Reaction score
1
Location
Vernon
Do the center cap type deals on these wheels come out?

wheels.jpg
 
yes, its all one piece around the lugs, the whole cap comes right off, if you get a better picture, you should be able to see a notch where you use the tire iron to pry them off

those look just like the ones on my 1st gen, i thought the offset was a little lower, the center looks like it sticks out further than i remember, but then again that was many moons ago.
 
You didn't buy those did you? If you want to go stock size for the track just go with the 17's, those are too ugly to even for track, I like how the gen1 5 spoke look on mine.
 
but the weight has to be different with a whole 1" (even if it was a 20lb difference per wheel i dont think it would matter too much with this near 2 ton beast)
 
but the weight has to be different with a whole 1" (even if it was a 20lb difference per wheel i dont think it would matter too much with this near 2 ton beast)

Not necessarily, and rotating mass has a much greater impact on performance.
 
Not necessarily, and rotating mass has a much greater impact on performance.

stock for stock, do you really think there will be much difference? these are not any type of "lightweight" wheel.

with all of the rotating parts including the rotor, what do you think that the difference in rotational mass will be in each corner the between the stock 17" and the 16" (also with the 1" less wheel that means you will have 1" more rubber)(yes, I know the metal weights more than the rubber)

it will be a very small percentage of change, couple that with the excess weight of the car and i say that 19 out of 20 people couldn't tell the difference, let alone make much difference on a test track(straight line, or handling through curves)

now a set of 4" wide drag lite's might be a slightly different story
 
stock for stock, do you really think there will be much difference? these are not any type of "lightweight" wheel.

with all of the rotating parts including the rotor, what do you think that the difference in rotational mass will be in each corner the between the stock 17" and the 16" (also with the 1" less wheel that means you will have 1" more rubber)(yes, I know the metal weights more than the rubber)

it will be a very small percentage of change, couple that with the excess weight of the car and i say that 19 out of 20 people couldn't tell the difference, let alone make much difference on a test track(straight line, or handling through curves)

now a set of 4" wide drag lite's might be a slightly different story


The stock 16 inchers are forged and ~13lbs per wheel. It is a much lighter set-up than the 17 inchers. The rotor and caliper assembly don't add to unsprung weight.
 
The stock 16 inchers are forged and ~13lbs per wheel. It is a much lighter set-up than the 17 inchers. The rotor and caliper assembly don't add to unsprung weight.

i know the caliper wont count(as it doesn't rotate), but why wouldn't the weight if the rotor count when figuring out difference in rotational mass from option A to B? that seems like an awful heavy chunk of metal spinning around if you are doing physics calculations.

mine sure felt like they weighted much more than 13lbs, they didn't seem too much lighter than the set of mark wheels i had for the summer however it might have just been the snow tires that where on them IDK
 
The rotor and caliper assembly don't add to unsprung weight.

Apparently my understanding of unsprung weight isn't correct then. I always thought that any part that didn't somehow ride on the springs was considered unsprung and contributed to the unsprung weight. This would include the rotor and caliper assembly as well as various suspension and steering components.

someone skool me please.

thanks
 
Apparently my understanding of unsprung weight isn't correct then. I always thought that any part that didn't somehow ride on the springs was considered unsprung and contributed to the unsprung weight. This would include the rotor and caliper assembly as well as various suspension and steering components.

someone skool me please.

thanks

I sit corrected.....

Unsprung Weight : The weight of the various parts of a vehicle which are not carried on the springs, such as wheels, axles, and brakes.

The calipers are already aluminum so the real weight would be the rotor. The caliber isn't very heavy at all. The ~15lb difference in the weight of the 17" and 16" wheels is of greater "concern".
 
The way I do things is simple, rotational mass vs non-rotational. Driveshaft, gears, axles, rotors, wheels and tires. Everything else is just regular weight.
 
Do you have any actual numbers on that, or is it a guestimate?

Nothing other than what Jonathon Crocker told me in 2001. Jonathon was the head suspension engineer for the LS. He used to be a suspension engineer on Michael Schumacker's team.
 
The way I do things is simple, rotational mass vs non-rotational. Driveshaft, gears, axles, rotors, wheels and tires. Everything else is just regular weight.
That has always been the way that
I understood it.

Nothing other than what Jonathon Crocker told me in 2001. Jonathon was the head suspension engineer for the LS. He used to be a suspension engineer on Michael Schumacker's team.

well that is definitely good enough for me, you really cant argue with the guy in charge of doing all the math!
 
Nothing other than what Jonathon Crocker told me in 2001. Jonathon was the head suspension engineer for the LS. He used to be a suspension engineer on Michael Schumacker's team.

So he knew what they intended...but that does not guarantee that it is how they were produced. Can someone just put it on a scale so we actually know?
 
Rotational mass is certainly a matter of concern, but unsprung weight---including the brake assys. and the tires/wheels---also has a considerable effect. They aren't the same, but both emphatically have to do with the behavior of the car.

KS
 

Members online

No members online now.
Back
Top