Palin pushes McCain staff aside as blame game begins

Joeychgo

Administrator
Staff member
Joined
Mar 2, 2004
Messages
5,999
Reaction score
194
Location
Chicago, IL
YouTube - Sarah Palin talks clothes.


Bill Clinton used Fleetwood Mac’s “Don’t Stop” as his theme for the 1992 presidential campaign. If reports of strife between Sarah Palin and the McCain campaign hold water, then the Alaska Governor might want to tap into Fleetwood Mac’s library as well (assuming she wouldn’t get sued, which is a big assumption). Her campaign song? “Go Your Own Way.”

As most polls show Barack Obama pulling away from John McCain, there are rumblings and perhaps signs that Palin is pulling away as well.

They’re not my staff

No, it doesn’t appear that the Republican vice presidential candidate has any problems with McCain himself. But there are indications that she doesn’t necessarily like his staff or has any future intention of following them.

Perhaps she gave up on following them earlier. Aides to McCain cite recent examples where Palin took things into her own hands. In Colorado last week, she insisted on talking to reporters on a tarmac despite attempts by Palin staff to shut down the conversation. She also denounced McCain robo-calls. Before that, she was outspoken about her disappointment with the campaign decision to pull out of Michigan.

I’m done with ‘em

Supporters of Palin say she’s had it with the campaign staff.

“She’s lost confidence in most of the people on the [campaign] plane,” a Palin insider told Politico. He says she would like to further ignore staff advice and do things her own way.

But CNN reports campaign aides say she’s a selfish renegade.

“She is a diva. She takes no advice from anyone,” said this McCain adviser. “She does not have any relationships of trust with any of us, her family, or anyone else.”

Bad introduction

Palin has let it be known that she’s not happy with the way she was introduced to the public following her speech at the Republican National Convention. Her supporters say the real Sarah Palin is the one who electrified the crowd that night in early September.

Yes, she had a teleprompter at that event. But they say she’s a natural and if she was able to interact with the media from the beginning instead of being quarantined from the press for nearly three weeks, the results would have been different.

Perhaps this is true. The New York Times has a detailed story this morning that could back that — or at least demonstrate that McCain aides were impressed with how she handled questions even on issues she was unfamiliar with. The story, in discussing how Palin was selected as the running mate, recounts campaign manager Rick Davis’s reaction to how she dealt with the press.

One tape in particular struck Davis as arresting: an interview with Palin and Gov. Janet Napolitano, the Arizona Democrat, on “The Charlie Rose Show” that was shown in October 2007. Reviewing the tape, it didn’t concern Davis that Palin seemed out of her depth on health-care issues or that, when asked to name her favorite candidate among the Republican field, she said, “I’m undecided.” What he liked was how she stuck to her pet issues — energy independence and ethics reform — and thereby refused to let Rose manage the interview.

Not ready for prime time

The public, especially with her interview with CBS anchor Katie Couric, saw an uncomfortable, tightly scripted Palin who would - like a magnet - gravitate back to talking points instead of engaging in a real conversation. The series of interviews were cringe-inducing and gave Saturday Night Live an abundance of material.

Sensing a sinking ship, reports are that some McCain staffers in attempts to save themselves from being blamed for a McCain - Palin loss are beginning to point fingers. And in this case directly at the VP nominee, according to CNN.

“Her lack of fundamental understanding of some key issues was dramatic,” said another McCain source with direct knowledge of the process to prepare Palin after she was picked. The source said it was probably the “hardest” to get her “up to speed than any candidate in history.”

She is ready

That’s not the Sarah Palin the Weekly Standard’s Fred Barnes knows.

“When I spent nearly two hours with Palin last year at the governor’s house in Juneau, I was struck by three things. She’s very smart, brimming with self-confidence, and not intimidated by the media.”

Properly vetted or not?

And further, if she is was as ill-prepared as some McCain staffers are saying, then it would suggest that she was never properly vetted — something that was angrily taken off the table for discussion by the McCain team six weeks ago.

But they can’t have it both ways. Either she was properly vetted or not. If she was properly vetted, then they knew what they were getting into. If she was not properly vetted, then they can only blame themselves for the selection.

This morning’s New York Times article would suggest the vetting was not as thorough as the McCain team had implied.

The following night, after McCain’s speech brought the convention to a close, one of the campaign’s senior advisers stayed up late at the Hilton bar savoring the triumphant narrative arc. I asked him a rather basic question: “Leaving aside her actual experience, do you know how informed Governor Palin is about the issues of the day?”The senior adviser thought for a moment. Then he looked up from his beer. “No,” he said quietly. “I don’t know.”

She would have done fine

Even if she wasn’t up to speed on the issues, many believe she would have been fine without the handling overkill by the McCain staff.

Had she been able to interact with the media as she innately knows how to things would have been different. At least Fred Barnes believes that.

“But [campaign advisers] simply didn’t trust her to perform adequately in those settings. She would need weeks of intense training and study. They were wrong, and at Palin’s expense. But they simply didn’t trust her to perform adequately in those settings.”

$150,000

As far as the media now go, she may be the most accessible candidate of the four. And controversy continues to follow her. Every time the McCain team tries to create traction, another controversy emerges.

The $150,000 clothing tab is the latest misadventure to hit the campaign. Speaking to Politico, an unknown supporter assigns blame to the campaign.

“It’s completely out-of-control operatives,” said the close ally outside the campaign. “She has no responsibility for that. It’s incredibly frustrating for us and for her.”

Regardless, she wasn’t afraid to bring it up this morning at a rally in Tampa. In fact, she seemed to revel in it.


http://features.csmonitor.com/polit...shes-mccain-staff-aside-as-blame-game-begins/
 
You gotta love the wardrobe deal...

I'm sorry -but think about it.

Obama or McCain could buy 10 top of the line suits - for what? $2k a piece?

Add another $10k for shirts & Ties.

Hell, another $5k for shoes, and another $5k for whatever. -- That's $40k.

Now, double it ---- You have a wardrobe (and a damn nice one) Obama and Biden --- and its STILL half of what just Palin bought.

And yet - she talks about being frugal?

I'm sorry, I just dont buy into it.
 
You gotta love the wardrobe deal...

I'm sorry -but think about it.

Obama or McCain could buy 10 top of the line suits - for what? $2k a piece?

Add another $10k for shirts & Ties.

Hell, another $5k for shoes, and another $5k for whatever. -- That's $40k.

Now, double it ---- You have a wardrobe (and a damn nice one) Obama and Biden --- and its STILL half of what just Palin bought.

And yet - she talks about being frugal?

I'm sorry, I just dont buy into it.
REPOST!
 
Joey, you write as though you are some authority.
Maybe we should start calling you Mr. Blackswell.

First- there are SEVEN people to dress.
Second- my understanding is that they bought a lot of clothes, then brought them to the family to chose from, try on, and select from. What wasn't picked, what didn't fit, was taken back. If the ENTIRE Palin family were walking around Mid-town Manhattan on a clothes shopping spree, don't you think it would have made the cover of the Daily News and run around the clock on MSNBC?

And even if were indulgent, it still costs less that Obama flying back and forth to Hawaii.....
Obama’s Hawaii Trips Cost More Than Palin’s Clothes
Sunday, October 26, 2008 3:21 PM

By: Ronald Kessler

Barack Obama’s trips to Hawaii on a chartered Boeing 757 each cost more than twice the price of Sarah Palin’s new clothes.

Brad Blakeman, who was in charge of scheduling for President Bush, says a Boeing 757 costs about $20,000 an hour for fuel, crew, and maintenance. Since a trip to Hawaii entails 10 hours of flying time from Chicago, the total cost for each round-trip comes to about $400,000.

Obama used the Boeing 757 for trips to Hawaii over the summer for a vacation and again last week to see his failing grandmother. Admirable though that visit was, “By Obama using a private jet to go on a purely personal visit to see his grandma, he’s wasting not only energy, but he’s using the money that his supporters have given him for campaign purposes,” Blakeman says. “It’s a purely personal visit paid for with campaign funds.”

On the other hand, the media are highlighting the Republican National Committee’s purchase of $150,000 in clothes for Palin, even though the dresses will be donated to charities. The New York Times played the story on page one.

“They’re picking on Palin, who was provided a wardrobe by the RNC strictly for political purposes, and it was always intended that these garments would be then given to charity,” Blakeman says. “So there’s a benefit that’s going to charity, not a benefit that Palin will have after the election. There was a need for it because she’s a modest person who didn’t have an extensive wardrobe to do 24/7 campaigning.”

To pick on Palin without going after Obama’s plane trips is “an absolute journalistic abuse,” Blakeman says. “This is the same plane that he took to Hawaii when he went on vacation. In the summertime, when gas was soaring and Americans were having to pinch their pennies, this guy gets on his campaign plane and goes to Hawaii on vacation. He did a couple campaign stops in a state that is not a swing state and is a guaranteed win for Obama. That was clearly to cover the tracks of this vacation.”

Blakeman notes that at the height of the gasoline price surge, Obama suggested that Americans check their vehicle’s tire pressure as a way of conserving fuel.

“I wonder if he checked the tires on his jumbo jet before taking off for a purely personal visit?” Blakeman says. “The way he spends campaign money is a direct reflection of how he will spend ours. He could have easily flown commercial or taken a much smaller corporate aircraft that would cost a fraction of a 757.”

Ironically, it was Palin as governor who saved money for Alaskans by selling the state’s jet and instead flying commercial.

Kellyanne Conway, one of the most respected Republican pollsters, says the media’s attack on Palin’s clothes is an example of elitist snobbery or “classism.” Noting the media’s treatment of her, “I can’t believe her own family still approves of her, after the unprecedented, personal and relentless attacks that this woman has undergone,” Conway says.

Besides attacks on Palin over her clothes, Conway cites snide remarks about “the way she speaks, her husband’s lack of a college degree, the barefoot and pregnant 17-year-old daughter, you know who hunts moose anyway? The classism is so raw and unapologetic, so unconsidered and so undisguised.”

Ronald Kessler is chief Washington correspondent of Newsmax.com. View his previous reports and get his dispatches sent to you free via
e-mail. Go here now.

© 2008 Newsmax. All rights reserved.
 
If McCain loses this race..... she will be gone. "I hope "


Palin the GOP's future? Don't bet on it

http://www.politico.com/news/stories/1008/14881.html

Many of my down-in-the-mouth Republican friends, contemplating the ongoing implosion of John McCain’s campaign, are consoling themselves with the idea that Alaska Gov. Sarah Palin represents the future of the party. She’s the new rock star in the firmament of the Grand Old Party, they’re convinced — and she certainly will be the presumed favorite for the Republican nomination in 2012.

All I can tell them is, don’t bet the bank on it. (OK, maybe under our economic circumstances that’s not quite the right choice of terminology, but you know what I mean.) During my lifetime (I was born in 1951), only one nonincumbent vice presidential nominee on a losing ticket — Bob Dole, who ran with President Gerald Ford in 1976 — has ever come back to win their party’s nomination, and none has ever been elected president.



In addition, Palin’s flirty, vampish demeanor — including the winking and lip-licking — while perhaps titillating the middle-aged white guys who attend her rallies (and which may have snagged her second place in the Miss Alaska pageant), is a huge turnoff to most of the smart independent and even moderate Republican women I know. Several of my GOP women friends all piled in a car recently and headed to Nevada to campaign for Barack Obama, such is their sense of indignation and disgust that Palin was supposed to appeal to them.

And the recent revelation that the Republican National Committee has spent $150,000 to doll her up in fancy duds from high-end emporiums like Neiman Marcus, Saks Fifth Avenue, Bloomingdale’s and Barney’s has taken a further toll on Palin’s already tarnished image. Some well-dressed Wal-Mart mom, huh?

After the McCain-Palin ticket gets its head handed to it next week, I suspect Palin will snag a lucrative book deal from some right-wing publisher and go on the rubber-chicken circuit, giving paid speeches to adoring conservative gatherings. She will continue to be the ethically challenged governor of the 47th-largest state, of course, with fewer residents than Barack Obama’s old Illinois state Senate district. Maybe now she will even have time to actually visit that Alaskan island in the Bering Sea from which you can see the Russian landmass.

But in the end, I believe Palin’s 15 minutes of shaky, flaky fame as the first woman on a Republican presidential ticket will end up much like her college career did — leaving no footprints. An Oct. 21 piece in the Los Angeles Times noted that she “left behind few traces” at the four colleges she attended over five years and that interviews with dozens of professors “yielded not a single snippet of a memory” about Palin. Likewise, her run for veep, I predict, will turn out to be little more than a brief historical footnote.

And if the Republican Party truly believes it has to stake its very future on such a vacuous, flash-in-the-pan Tina Fey impersonator as Sarah Palin, you can betcha the party is facin’ bleak times, fer shure.
 
D.C. Republicans don't get it. And they won't. They are pathetic, weak, and so beaten down that they're willing to sell their souls in order to get invited to the "good" parties.

That's why they are destined to remain the minority party. Don't trust them or their opinions when it comes to the future of the party or conservative movement.
 

Members online

Back
Top