gcwimmer
Dedicated LVC Member
This may just be a really stupid question, but is there really any benefit to painting the cover? Is there really any benefit in having the engine cover at all??
I mean I'm the kind of guy that has no use for underhood 'flash'. If something has a real benefit, then I'm all for it.
But as far as I am aware, the engine cover was a cheap way for FMC to avoid having to do a lot of machining to "pretty" up the engine compartment.
So I look at it like this, Does it matter what the finish on the valve covers looks like if the car running down the road??
Maybe its just because I don't open my hood except when I need to maintain my vehicle.
To me the covers under there are just that much more crap that I have to remove to get in to do anything with the motor.
Am I the only one that feels this way???
You can keep the show, I just want the Go
No benefit to painting just personal preference just engine jewelry.
The cover is a heat shield, as others have commented, good to keep on.