This is about where I'd mount the nozzle, personally. I'd be worried about feeding 3/4 of the spray into the front 4 cyls with the way the throttle bodies and 2nd gen intake are set up. I'll post a pic of my friend's 2nd gen install (same HSW kit, different intake tube) tomorrow.
I was thinking the same thing. The nozzle looks way too close. Mine(dry) is even further back past the ribbed area on the intake tube. I would be worried about only the front of the motor getting most of the shot.
I'm running a 100 shot right now. Will be running a 125 or even 150 shot once I get it dynotuned. I've decided that i'm gonna have it SCT dynotuned, only gonna be using the Sniper for datalogging purposes. I have no complaints about HSW's customer service, they are fast to reply.
I'd put a bolt in there... some kind of physical thing blocking the hole... I don't trust epoxy... those tubes aren't rare by any means though... I have an extra.
As for dry nozzle locations I've read some spray thru the MAF thats not what zex said to do. Maybe its a chevy thing. I havnt seen any fords spraying thru the MAF up my way. .
Commanded at idle is around 14.64, so it might be a little lean..and would indicate error in your MAF transfer function, but should be of no consequence.CAR runs lean at little to no throttle...
That is good!Hit the throttle and its good. ..
That is better, pill it UP! (lol, that's where it begins)Even sprayed alittle and it was go got more rich...
that means either you have a pretty good "variance" between "commanded and delivered" A/F OR your N/A tune probably isn't very aggressive or what would be considered "conservative or safe".That was on my NA tune as well..
*thumbs up*Most the time thats the tune I spray on the street. It seems good.
You got a fix it ticket for having no mufflers? Were you flooring it by him cause the car is not loud at all with just no mufflers. It sounds like a Mustang with flowmasters...