mks vs cts

It is pretty gosh darn stupid to compare a 276 HP MKS with a 559 HP CTS-V.
Seriously!
$40000 compared to $60000.
On top of that even a comparo of the CTS to the CTS-V is unfair!
They definitely should have compared the MKS with the regular CTS, even then with a grain of salt because they are not even both rear or front wheel drive vehicles.
Dumb Dumb Dumb.....
 
That wasn't the CTS-V. It only had 270lb of torque. I think they definitely mangled some facts though, because they said the CTS cost almost 70k. The V I'm sure that's true. Regular CTS? No way.

That said the bald guy was annoying and tough to listen to, but the other dude was a pro and had some interesting things to say.
 
If I knew absolutely nothing about either cars, I'd pick the Caddy just on looks alone. That is one seriously menacing looking car right there.
 
On top of that...the MKS is Lincoln's flagship...the DTS is Cadillac's flagship......they're full of themselves...that's like comparing a % series BMW to a Honda accord
 
that was my thoughts , the bald dude keeps reminising about other cars and really we cant compare these cars. maybe LS and CTS if we had a new LS....
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Members online

No members online now.
Total: 216 (members: 0, guests: 216)
Back
Top