Joe Biden said what?

[fossten]

Maybe its not for you to understand and by the way learn to break up my words from yours before trying to respond next time. Your insults are not even recognized in the mixed up mess you call a response and if i need to grow up why even attempt to debate me at anything or even respond to any of my post.

Ah yes, the victim mentality and the reverse insult. It's EVERYONE ELSE'S fault that nobody wants to read your posts, since clearly you are the product of outcome-based education and EVERYONE ELSE should be tolerant and bother to pick apart your insane, illogical, incoherent, shallow ramblings.

It's just yet another case of the man keepin' ya down. Brutha.

 

[StincolnLincoln]

Ah yes, the victim mentality and the reverse insult. It's EVERYONE ELSE'S fault that nobody wants to read your posts, since clearly you are the product of outcome-based education and EVERYONE ELSE should be tolerant and bother to pick apart your insane, illogical, incoherent, shallow ramblings.

It's just yet another case of the man keepin' ya down. Brutha.

and as usual you as stated the master of :q:q:q:q:q:q:qs trying to shoot your bull:q:q:q:q once again.

 

[napoleon1072]

Ah yes, the victim mentality and the reverse insult. It's EVERYONE ELSE'S fault that nobody wants to read your posts, since clearly you are the product of outcome-based education and EVERYONE ELSE should be tolerant and bother to pick apart your insane, illogical, incoherent, shallow ramblings.

It's just yet another case of the man keepin' ya down. Brutha.

You're just upset that he doesn't share your views, and opinions. There should be more tolerance in this country, people should be able to form there opinions without fear of persecution. All you are doing is persecuting Stincoln for expressing his opinions. So his post had a few errors, BIG WHOOP. Don't tell me that educated individuals such as yourselves stumbled over his words and had the slightest difficulty in comprehending his thoughts? Didn't think so... Now let's move on and talk about things that really matter.

 

[Calabrio]

You're just upset that he doesn't share your views, and opinions. There should be more tolerance in this country, people should be able to form there opinions without fear of persecution. All you are doing is persecuting Stincoln for expressing his opinions. So his post had a few errors, BIG WHOOP. Don't tell me that educated individuals such as yourselves stumbled over his words and had the slightest difficulty in comprehending his thoughts? Didn't think so... Now let's move on and talk about things that really matter.

No, that's not the problem.
I've written multiple response to him. Perhaps the mistake was that I wrote them at an adult level and confused him. He has yet to engage in anything resembling thoughtful debate. And if there's a page with 15 lines of substantiative discussion and a four word joke, he'll spend the next two pages crying victim about the silly joke at his expense.

He's being challenged for his opinion, he's getting a hard time because he's so inconsiderate of the board posting such illegible nonsense.

 

[shagdrum]

He's being challenged for his opinion, he's getting a hard time because he's so inconsiderate of the board posting such illegible nonsense.

X2

He is the second person on my "ignore list". I really do love that option.

 

[fossten]

You're just upset that he doesn't share your views, and opinions. There should be more tolerance in this country, people should be able to form there opinions without fear of persecution. All you are doing is persecuting Stincoln for expressing his opinions. So his post had a few errors, BIG WHOOP. Don't tell me that educated individuals such as yourselves stumbled over his words and had the slightest difficulty in comprehending his thoughts? Didn't think so... Now let's move on and talk about things that really matter.

This is an ignorant post. You have no idea if I'm upset at all. The tone of my post is amused, actually. Your judgment is way off.

Next.

 

[StincolnLincoln]

No, that's not the problem.
I've written multiple response to him. Perhaps the mistake was that I wrote them at an adult level and confused him. He has yet to engage in anything resembling thoughtful debate. And if there's a page with 15 lines of substantiative discussion and a four word joke, he'll spend the next two pages crying victim about the silly joke at his expense.

He's being challenged for his opinion, he's getting a hard time because he's so inconsiderate of the board posting such illegible nonsense.

Where have you seen my cry victim show me where. And as far as answering your questions at what you call and adult level i wouldnt waste my time with giving you what you call a reasonable response because no matter what i say you always seem to deem yourself correct or more so as if you can never be wrong. I have noticed this thru out many post between you and a few others.

 

[StincolnLincoln]

Also i have noticed its easy to get you as well as a few others to a point of if it's something you don't like or cant figure out, you go to name calling and trying to degrade whatever a person says. I come on here i say what i want to say and even if you say it doesn't make since if it so bad why not ignore me add me to your ignore list as soon as you can.

 

[Calabrio]

i wouldnt waste my time with giving you what you call a reasonable response because no matter what i say you always seem to deem yourself correct or more so as if you can never be wrong. I have noticed this thru out many post between you and a few others.

Perhaps the pattern here is that you are always wrong.
The really clever part is that after I say you're wrong, I tell you why and advance another idea.
In a debate or a discussion, usually this would be you're opportunity to defend your position and critique what I said.

It's a back and forth. Get it?
You don't just repeat stupid mantras unchallenged.

 

[LsUnV2]

Where have you seen my cry victim show me where. And as far as answering your questions at what you call and adult level i wouldnt waste my time with giving you what you call a reasonable response because no matter what i say you always seem to deem yourself correct or more so as if you can never be wrong. I have noticed this thru out many post between you and a few others.

that was a really long sentence. you guys are funny. Hey, I have an idea, lets see who can piss in the wind and not get wet!!!!

 

[fossten]

i wouldnt waste my time with giving you what you call a reasonable response

You're right. If I spend enough time, I can find the truth in his posts.

 

[StincolnLincoln]

Perhaps the pattern here is that you are always wrong.
The really clever part is that after I say you're wrong, I tell you why and advance another idea.
In a debate or a discussion, usually this would be you're opportunity to defend your position and critique what I said.

It's a back and forth. Get it?
You don't just repeat stupid mantras unchallenged.

The funny part of anything you say about me is that i never actually answer anything you question me on so in return you look stupid for even trying. The challenge is to realize that i havent even began to respond in a manner that you deem fit. As i have proven time and time again no matter what anyone says to you, you will always remain a bias figure on political and or personal issues.

 

[StincolnLincoln]

You're right. If I spend enough time, I can find the truth in his posts.

Spend more time figure out as much as you can.

Don't you realize i have been making you and your cheerleader spin both your wheels with the back and forth and i haven't even attempted to satisfy your hungry to try and make a liar out of me when in actuality i haven't even began to answer or engage you or him in anything. My point has been proven time and time again.

Your name should forever be mentioned in the definition of Bias....

 

[Calabrio]

The funny part of anything you say about me is that i never actually answer anything you question me on so in return you look stupid for even trying.

So, to be clear, in a political discussion forum you think I look stupid for asking you questions that go unanswered?

More sound logic...

 

[napoleon1072]

This is an ignorant post. You have no idea if I'm upset at all. The tone of my post is amused, actually. Your judgment is way off.

Next.

Hardly ignorant. I call it how I see it, and in this case it'd appear that I called it right since you're all still teaming on Stincoln. Doesn't even look that entertaining tbh, so seriously what's the point? :shifty:

 

[fossten]

Hardly ignorant. I call it how I see it, and in this case it'd appear that I called it right since you're all still teaming on Stincoln. Doesn't even look that entertaining tbh, so seriously what's the point? :shifty:

I guess you obtusely refuse to consider that there might be another motive behind this action OTHER THAN being upset...like amusement.

Ah, well, tunnelvision is most likely not your biggest flaw.

 

[napoleon1072]

Ah, well, tunnelvision is most likely not your biggest flaw.

Amusement isn't a justification. I'm sure being a conservative isn't your only flaw

 

[shagdrum]

Gotta love the nuanced arguments of the left here. Instead of actually debating they act like an ill behaving 8 year old with a bad attitude.

Refusing to accept the truth means that it isn't the truth.

 

[turborich]

Well we are all entitled to our opinions on whether or not he is qualified. I for one think he is very qualified. And as far as inviting attacks i dont think thats what he was trying to do. It was more of a way of letting the people who plan to attack that they will be more than ready. Thats how i see it. Now if i am wrong on my view that will just remain to be seen.

Obama is qualified to be president? How? We don't even know if that terrorist friendly Obama even has a US birth certificate. Why don't you explain how he is qualified? Is it because he is black & it's racist to not vote for him?

 

[fossten]

Amusement isn't a justification. I'm sure being a conservative isn't your only flaw

What are you, the motivation arbiter? Don't make me laugh. I can say anything I want as long as it's within the forum rules. You're trying to piss up a rope here. Good luck with that. I guess you don't have any substantive argument to make, and you're actually trying to bait me by doing the same thing you're accusing me of doing.

And being a conservative is a virtue. Get your facts straight. If you think I'm insulted by your snark, you're sadly mistaken.

Don't even begin to think you can push my buttons. I've been around quite a while, and I've dealt with far meatier fare than you, troll.

Buh-bye now.

Yawn.

 

[02lsev8]

Being Tested

Joe Liberman made almost the same statement about McCain being tested on a FOX news interview. What Joe Bidden was trying to say is no matter who gets in office we will be tested. It happend in the early Clinton years and also during the early Bush years. We are all in this together like it or not!

 

[shagdrum]

Joe Liberman made almost the same statement about McCain being tested on a FOX news interview.

If you actually believe the second statement here, then I don't really trust your judgement. I need to see a transcript, or video of what Liberman said, in context, before I buy your point.

What Joe Bidden was trying to say is no matter who gets in office we will be tested. It happend in the early Clinton years and also during the early Bush years. We are all in this together like it or not!

Much as you may want to spin it, we have all heard Biden's words. He was specifically talking about an Obama presidency, not any presidency. Are you really trying to claim he was talking about something he specifically was not talking about?

You seem to be disengenuously trying to broaden the scope of Biden's comments to include McCain and thus make them meaningless as a critique of Obama. Sorry, the facts are the facts, and they are very clear in this case.

 

[02lsev8]

Liesberman statement

WASHINGTON, June 29, 2008 While on Face the nation Lieberman makes this comment

Lieberman: U.S. May Be Attacked In 2009
McCain Supporter Says Terrorists Have Tested New Presidents By Launching Attacks In First Year Of Term

(CBS) In describing the reasons he believes the Republicans' presumptive nominee for president would be better prepared than the Democrats' to lead the nation next January, Sen. Joe Lieberman said that history shows the United States would likely face a terrorist attack in 2009.

"Our enemies will test the new president early," Lieberman, I-Conn., told Face The Nation host Bob Schieffer. "Remember that the truck bombing of the World Trade Center happened in the first year of the Clinton administration. 9/11 happened in the first year of the Bush administration."

All I'm saying is Lieberman brought this subject up first. What ever that's worth. There was'nt as much attention paid to his statement as was Joe Bidens. Now It's a big story, where was this story months ago?

That's all I'm trying to say. We all have to be carefull on how the media seems to direct our attention.