How Republicans Blew It

[fossten]

What a joke, are you going to applaud god as he tosses her in?

Your thrilled that she will be burning in hell?

Give me a break.

Whatever......

You're putting words in my mouth. "Whatever."

It is nice, however, to see you so outraged. It lets me know which buttons to push. Out of curiosity, would you be so apoplectic if I'd said this to a guy?

Rev 1:7 Behold, he cometh with clouds; and every eye shall see him, and they also which pierced him: and all kindreds of the earth shall wail because of him. Even so, AMEN.

Rev 20:11 And I saw a great white throne, and him that sat on it, from whose face the earth and the heaven fled away; and there was found no place for them. 12 And I saw the dead, small and great, stand before God; and the books were opened: and another book was opened, which is the book of life: and the dead were judged out of those things which were written in the books, according to their works. 13 And the sea gave up the dead which were in it; and death and hell delivered up the dead which were in them: and they were judged every man according to their works. 14 And death and hell were cast into the lake of fire. This is the second death. 15 And whosoever was not found written in the book of life was cast into the lake of fire.

Rev 21:8 But the fearful, and unbelieving, and the abominable, and murderers, and whoremongers, and sorcerers, and idolaters, and all liars, shall have their part in the lake which burneth with fire and brimstone: which is the second death.

21:27 And there shall in no wise enter into it [the city] any thing that defileth, neither whatsoever worketh abomination, or maketh a lie: but they which are written in the Lamb's book of life.

 

[ford nut]

You're putting words in my mouth. "Whatever."

I put no words in your mouth.
Only quoted what you typed, then asked a couple questions that you failed to answer.

It is nice, however, to see you so outraged. It lets me know which buttons to push. Out of curiosity, would you be so apoplectic if I'd said this to a guy?

Push away big boy.
My posts towards you has been consistent.
You and I have been going rounds before foxpaws showed up.
We will be doing it after she is gone.

 

[fossten]

I put no words in your mouth.
Only quoted what you typed, then asked a couple questions that you failed to answer.

Push away big boy.
My posts towards you has been consistent.
You and I have been going rounds before foxpaws showed up.
We will be doing it after she is gone.

How cute. But I'm not interested in you nearly as much as you are in me. Buh-bye, now.

 

[hrmwrm]

Only quoted what you typed, then asked a couple questions that you failed to answer.

but fosstens good at failing to answer.
then cornholio locks the thread, giving him an out.
it's the circle jerk triplets.

 

[Calabrio]

"are you threatening me...."

Try to put aside your affinity and interest for homosexual fantasy and stay on topic.

 

[fossten]

I put no words in your mouth.
Only quoted what you typed, then asked a couple questions that you failed to answer.

Let's be clear.

1. You asked LOADED questions, of the 'do you still beat your wife' variety
2. You don't really CARE what I think, your purpose is only to be an ankle biting troll, taunt, or express your disapproval
3. If I answered your LOADED questions, you'd only sneer or ask more followup LOADED questions.

You're an open book. And as I said, you're extremely lean fare and I'm not that interested.

So why should I bother.

Go have a circle jerk with hrmwrm, you guys are charter members of the 'Fossten sucks' Internet Warriors Club.

 

[ford nut]

Let's be clear.

1. You asked LOADED questions, of the 'do you still beat your wife' variety
2. You don't really CARE what I think, your purpose is only to be an ankle biting troll, taunt, or express your disapproval
3. If I answered your LOADED questions, you'd only sneer or ask more followup LOADED questions.

You're an open book. And as I said, you're extremely lean fare and I'm not that interested.

So why should I bother.

Go have a circle jerk with hrmwrm, you guys are charter members of the 'Fossten sucks' Internet Warriors Club.

All I did was point out a comment you posted.
The only part you have correct is... I don't really care what you think.

This is funny as hell.

Fox, you're lucky I'm not a moderator.

You of all people ....a moderator.:bowrofl:
Funny chit.

 

[foxpaws]

Interesting, because your e-damsel in distress was recently complaining that I don't address my spirituality here.

I just stated that you haven't here. No complaining, why would you say that Cal?

And the only person who referenced "damning to hell" specifically was, again, foxpaws.

There is a special place in hell for people like you, and I will be there watching from above when you are tossed in.

Maybe I won't burn in that 'special place in hell' maybe you fry or fricassee there, in that special place where Foss will be watching me from above.. or should we say 'on high'..

Splitting hairs aren't you Cal?

 

[THEMOJOMAN]

it has been a long time since i have been on the political forum, but i think i need to chime in here.
This health plan will never see the light of day.
It is unconstitutional, and not enforceable.
Dictating, with backing from the irs as a watchdog, that the american people buy health insurance or be fined for not doing so smells of a government takeover , and reeks of communisim.
Eventually the ussc will get this tossed in their lap, and there is only one decision they can make concerning this health plan, and that is, forcing people to buy health insurance is unconstitutional.
It can not be compared with the states requiring people to buy auto insurance.
It is a whole different can of beans.
People purchase auto insurance for the priviledge of driving.
People can't be forced to buy health insurance because health is not a priveledge.
So sit back and watch what happens in the next 60 days.
The first thing that will happen is an injunction to cease and decist, virtually posponing any action to go forward with the health plan.
That will be followed with months of court briefs and arguments, then it will be handed over too the ussc which more than likely will move on it imediately.
Bob.

bob i hope and pray you're right !!

 

[PetesSweets86]

demotiv time!

 

[hrmwrm]

Go have a circle jerk with hrmwrm,

coudn't come up with anything original?
that's not like you.

 

[fossten]

Maybe I won't burn in that 'special place in hell' maybe you fry or fricassee there, in that special place where Foss will be watching me from above.. or should we say 'on high'..

Splitting hairs aren't you Cal?

Looks like you're taking a little editorial license yourself there.

You're the last person who should be accusing someone else of splitting hairs. Glass houses and all that.

Looks like this thread has devolved into a flame and troll session.

 

[Calabrio]

I just stated that you haven't here. No complaining, why would you say that Cal?

It was a critical observation in context, but it's not important. The point wasn't that you're being hypocritical, merely that I'm not proselytizing on the internet.

Thanks for confirming my point.

Splitting hairs aren't you Cal?

Nope, not splitting hairs.
I stand corrected.

But the broader point still remains. If some is making arguments with using their religiosity to give them authority or strengthen their argument, then it seems reasonable that it is a subject for discussion. I personally wouldn't go in that direction, but that doesn't make it wrong to do so. The people most critical of what Fossten in this thread are the same ones that constantly interject religion into discussion seemingly solely in an effort to provoke or attack Fossten based on faith.

 

[fossten]

coudn't come up with anything original?
that's not like you.

Correct. The difference is that you two aren't worth anything original, so I make exceptions in your case.

 

[hrmwrm]

at least i answer what i'm queried.

The people most critical of what Fossten in this thread are the same ones that constantly interject religion into discussion seemingly solely in an effort to provoke or attack Fossten based on faith.

who interject's the religion? it's usually a rebuttal to it. get your fvckin facts straight.

 

[04SCTLS]

at least i answer what i'm queried.



who interject's the religion? it's usually a rebuttal to it. get your fvckin facts straight.

Your sig always has religion or atheism as it's theme.

 

[shagdrum]

your sig always has religion or atheism as it's theme.

bingo!

 

[Calabrio]

who interject's the religion? it's usually a rebuttal to it. get your fvckin facts straight.

....Says the defensive member with a history of confrontational avatars and signatures.

 

[shagdrum]

....Says the defensive member with a history of confrontational avatars and signatures.

Let's not forget this avatar...

Or these gems from another thread (around post #66, IIRC)...

 

[fossten]

^^^^Ouch man. That'll leave a mark.

*owned*

 

[hrmwrm]

Your sig always has religion or atheism as it's theme.

right. like this one.

and atheism, maybe. not religion. that is why i do not interject religion.

as if different from the political bases around here.
but then, we are talking of posts in threads here, not choices of avatars or sigs-

Says the defensive member with a history of confrontational avatars and signatures.

aren't we mr. defensive of right circular friends moderator.


mine are no more confrontational than many others that have been on here. (or still on here) if it bothers you, turn sigs and avatars off and stop whining. never see me cry about what others use.

Or these gems from another thread (around post #66, IIRC)...

they were for not proving your headline even to the end. you could do a better job of proving rep's promoting hatred.
http://act.credoaction.com/campaign/gop_hate/

 

[shagdrum]

and atheism, maybe. not religion. that is why i do not interject religion.

Yeah, those two concepts are not at all connected.

but then, we are talking of posts in threads here, not choices of avatars or sigs-

No, we are talking about you claiming you do not inject religion into a thread when your sig and avatar do precisely that.

mine are no more confrontational than many others that have been on here. (or still on here)...

Difference is, we don't whine about someone injecting politics and ideology into a debate while having those sig's and avatars...

they were for not proving your headline even to the end.

Continuing the lie...

it seems that the only way you can defend your point is to get more nasty and belligerent. You have proven countless times that your views concerning politics and especially religion are based more in mindless dogma then in an actual understanding of the point of view you are espousing and/or attacking.

you exemplify Edmund Burke's famous statement:

it is no excuse for presumptuous ignorance that it is directed by insolent passion​

 

[foxpaws]

No, we are talking about you claiming you do not inject religion into a thread when your sig and avatar do precisely that.

And since your signature and mine includes 'Nazi' and "Fascism" should we assume that as soon as we enter a discussion "Godwin's Law" has reared its ugly head? If it is in a signature it has been injected (through some sort of osmosis) into the conversation - correct? Is that what you are implying here shag?

And Foss's signature obviously shows an overriding jealously of someone who can afford Italian shoes. Perhaps he can't afford them himself, or the ones in his size just aren't that stylish. Should that affect how his posts are viewed? Should we view them through the filter of 'hater of 4" stilettos'? I know Foss, that you are so upset that Christian Louboutin isn't making the Ernesta Bow in your size.

 

[hrmwrm]

No, we are talking about you claiming you do not inject religion into a thread when your sig and avatar do precisely that.

If it is in a signature it has been injected (through some sort of osmosis) into the conversation - correct?

.

 

[hrmwrm]

Let's not forget this avatar...

Or these gems from another thread (around post #66, IIRC)...

just like everything he posts must inject socialism. and fossten, well, must be some new gangster religion. right, that works.
quoted you so i don't have to look them up again.