I don't think you understand correctly.
I do understand correctly, and you do a great job of explaining it
I just have a tendency to get oversteer and understeer mixed up, that's all. But I assure you, I follow you even if I get my semantics backwards. You aren't telling me anything I don't already know.
I'm saying that when people go too big with a rear bar, it will make the rear step out too soon, thus a mild upgrade to the front will balance it out.
Example: I have a 1-1/8" bar in the rear of my 96 and stock up front. It balances out perfectly, the rear end is very controllable but it still handles noticably better than stock.
When I was shopping for another one, I test drove a guy with a 1-3/8" bar in the rear and stock up front. Getting on that while going around a corner was dangerous - the rear stepped out without warning and very uncontrollably. In has case, a small upgrade to the front bar would have done the trick. Not a 1-3/8" front bar, but the next step up from stock, and that would have balanced it perfectly.
Again, I was assuming that there was already a rear bar upgrade done on the car in question, which was my mistake as I should have asked first.
Mushiness in steering: can't testify for a Mark VIII, but I can for a Cougar XR7 that there was less 'give' in the steering after he upgraded his front bar. Of course, he failed to consider all the stuff you just explained and had done a front bar the same size as the rear, and created too much understeer for himself. Ended up putting stock back on.