Going Rogue

[foxpaws]

Again, go back and read. Clearly you're stalling, trying to make me repeat myself. Not gonna happen. You're a waste of time.

So - you think that going to the publishing house and sitting around and working on the drafts means she didn't have a ghost writer? I just want a statement from you Foss - this should be easy - ghostwriter - yes or no?

Moving the goalposts again.

Nope - proved quote didn't matter - leader has changed his mind... got another one - I am waiting - you were the one that asked how many would suffice - lets say more than zero...

You're really a moron, aren't you? First, Bush's surge PROVED that more troops would be successful, DESPITE Obama's VERBAL OPPOSITION AND PREDICTION THAT THE SURGE WOULD FAIL.

Second, McChrystal said he needed the troops NOW - and Obama didn't want to make a decision because he wanted to pass his stupid healthcare takeover and didn't want to piss off his base. Try and keep up.

You just can't get over he is sending troops can you - you will try anything to discredit him. Even when he does something that you praised Bush for, you find excuses...

Blah blah blah...Dodging the issue. Your boy Obama is a statist and he's clearly pushing an unconstitutional bill. This latest blah from you doesn't mean anything.

So - don't have anything - huh?

Uh huh. You can't file frivolous lawsuits against the President like you can according to Alaska law. There's a provision that allows the governor to be sued for anything. Try and keep up.

So explain the lawsuit filed against Reagan from God...

Well he was uncomfortable over 100 times in his SHORT tenure. What it left him with was NO voting record.

short - how many things did he vote on Foss - want a clue - far more than 10x that 100...

Weak.
Not good at connecting dots, are you? Or is it a case of denial + myopia?

Or is it a case of blame them for everything - how many contracts did Reagan, Clinton, Bush have out that paid off friends, campaign contributors, et al? For you it is a case of naivety - you just don't understand how the world of politics goes round - do you foss.

No, I didn't. But it's good evidence, far more than you've done, Miss Proof by Assertion.

Sorry - that was Cal - should have checked better -

I know her - she is tough - sorry if you don't believe me. I suppose your definition of tough is moose hunting - I don't know. I know tough broads - Hillary is one.

 

[fossten]

So - you think that going to the publishing house and sitting around and working on the drafts means she didn't have a ghost writer? I just want a statement from you Foss - this should be easy - ghostwriter - yes or no?

I've already answered this, so it should be easy for you. Lazy.

Nope - proved quote didn't matter - leader has changed his mind... got another one - I am waiting - you were the one that asked how many would suffice - lets say more than zero...

How do you know he changed his mind? How would that change the fact that he mocked Obama? No, you're moving the goalposts.

So explain the lawsuit filed against Reagan from God...

No, you explain it. And while you're at it, cite that red herring, exception proves the rule case.

You just can't get over he is sending troops can you - you will try anything to discredit him. Even when he does something that you praised Bush for, you find excuses...

A fascinating response, fox, really, considering that you are dodging the truth. Your boy is a vacillator. Deal with it.

Or is it a case of blame them for everything - how many contracts did Reagan, Clinton, Bush have out that paid off friends, campaign contributors, et al? For you it is a case of naivety - you just don't understand how the world of politics goes round - do you foss.

Talk about conspiracy theories. Do you just pull this stuff out of thin air? Talk about irrelevant.

Did Reagan use government tax revenue to pay off campaign debts for his competitors?

Sorry - that was Cal - should have checked better -

Not surprising. You still haven't read my post that explained that Palin's 'ghost writer' was actually a collaborator.

 

[shagdrum]

You could want an amendment that said that white men had to be slaves to women - it wouldn't get through committee because it would be deemed unconstitutional - drat....

You really don't understand what "constitutional" means, do you. A constitutional amendment can not be "unconstitutional".

 

[shagdrum]

And do you understand you can have a small town mindset in one area and not have it define who you are?

Until you can explain it in concrete terms, no one can understand what you mean by a "small town mindset".

You have a tendency to black and white everything shag- this isn't.... and until you get out of this whole definition mode - forget it - I need gray on this - and you don't understand gray.

I understand "gray" and I understand when someone is trying to exaggerate or down right manufacture a false "gray" area. You said it yourself, you "need gray on this". In other words, your criticism is only effective when it is vague and undefined. When critically examined you can't demonstrate any substance to it.

Your critique is a deceptive smear, nothing more...

 

[fossten]

And do you understand you can have a small town mindset in one area and not have it define who you are?

Why do you refuse to define what you mean by this term?

 

[fossten]

Baaaaa - Palin wants a amendment - but that amendment would never get through any sort of vetting process - it would be deemed unconstitutional before it got out of committee.

You could want an amendment that said that white men had to be slaves to women - it wouldn't get through committee because it would be deemed unconstitutional - drat....

Ignorant rambling troll is ignorant and rambling.

 

[04SCTLS]

I suppose a small town mindset could be described as more friendly and easygoing than the big town mindset which is more MYOB.
In smaller towns people all (mostly) know each other better which makes them more like a big family.
Small towns usually have less problems to deal with compared to bigger urban areas.
Maybe that's where the lightweight stereotype comes from.
Palin is touring smaller cities promoting her book (and herself) as that's most comfortable for her.
She seems to be working at it and improving her rhetoric.
I think she looked good posting an oped in the Washington Post criticising Al Gore and the approach to climate change.
Didn't see any ditziness in her of recent.
She's become the republican sound bite in a good way.

I'm starting to warm up to her

 

[shagdrum]

I suppose a small town mindset could be described as more friendly and easygoing than the big town mindset which is more MYOB.
In smaller towns people all (mostly) know each other better which makes them more like a big family.
Small towns usually have less problems to deal with compared to bigger urban areas.
Maybe that's where the lightweight stereotype comes from.
Palin is touring smaller cities promoting her book (and herself) as that's most comfortable for her.
She seems to be working at it and improving her rhetoric.
I think she looked good posting an oped in the Washington Post criticising Al Gore and the approach to climate change.
Didn't see any ditziness in her of recent.
She's become the republican sound bite in a good way.

I'm starting to warm up to her

I don't see anything in there that would prevent someone with that mindset from governing at a larger level. Just an elitist stereotype, as you seemed to allude to...

 

[Calabrio]

"Cultivators of the earth are the most valuable citizens. They are the most vigorous, the most independent, the most virtuous, & they are tied to their country & wedded to it's liberty & interests by the most lasting bonds."

 

[fossten]

I suppose a small town mindset could be described as more friendly and easygoing than the big town mindset which is more MYOB.
In smaller towns people all (mostly) know each other better which makes them more like a big family.
Small towns usually have less problems to deal with compared to bigger urban areas.
Maybe that's where the lightweight stereotype comes from.
Palin is touring smaller cities promoting her book (and herself) as that's most comfortable for her.
She seems to be working at it and improving her rhetoric.
I think she looked good posting an oped in the Washington Post criticising Al Gore and the approach to climate change.
Didn't see any ditziness in her of recent.
She's become the republican sound bite in a good way.

I'm starting to warm up to her

Interesting thoughts, truly. Makes sense.

And of course, crickets from foxpaws...