I've already explained this. When you get time away from your long rants, you should really read it this time, instead of skimming/skipping it.
There isn't co-authorship credit - want to show it to me Foss - Cal claimed co-author - it certainly isn't registered that way.
Yeah. New York or California. Good examples, considering they're both on the way to being failed states while being governed by liberals. Nice job of moving the goalposts. Tell me, do you think Obama could have governed California or New York, based on his extensive experience as a community agitator?
Yep.
Obama is considered a laughingstock by the rest of the world, especially after his apology tour. Next.
Really - got quotes from those world leaders?
Obama definitely doesn't. He's still perpetuating the failed Jimmy Carter Appease the World strategy. Next.
Really - 30,000 troops to Afghanistan?
Give an example of this, please.
She is for a federal amendment that defines marriage - good luck with the constitutionality on that...
She has the exact same position on gay marriage as Obama. Next.
No she doesn't - see above -
You haven't even read this. Talk about swallowing talking points - why bother reading it, as Cal says. You're so myopic you couldn't possibly give her book a fair shake. I'll bet you haven't read one page, and somebody told you it was folksy.
Sorry - I have, again 30 pages or so. The first part deals with a visit to the state fair - and Palin talking with the people in the Right to Life booth - and talking points about the poster child for the group. There was a lot about her dissatisfaction with politics, however she also got in the little point she had an 85 (or something high like that) approval rating as governor. It was also at the state fair that McCain called her asking if she wanted to 'change history'.
Which is wrongly based on nonfactual talking points fed to you by the left.
Wrong. They were just ramping up. She was nearly paralyzed with legal action and couldn't do any governing. Try and keep up.
Really - 15 ethics complaints - small potatoes Foss...
Aw, it's a cult. How cute. And your blind obedience to "The Won" isn't? That's a laugh. Tell me, do you know how many times Obama voted 'Present?'
Move those goalposts, why don't you. Hillary is a weakling. Had to beg Obie for campaign cash to pay off her debts. At least Sarah is earning hers.
I have no blind obedience to Obama - I think he has been a somewhat so-so president to this point. He seems to be taking a long time finding his way around, and how to deal with the Hill. And yes, I know how many times he voted 'present', odd I also know what a vote like that means - something you can't seem to comprehend (this has been discussed previously).
Sarah has no campaign debt - duh... Sarah contributed nothing monetarily. I believe Hillary loaned her campaign about 13 million dollars - which she wasn't repaid, she has written it off.
Hillary couldn't take money from Obama's campaign - it is against the law. She can (and did) ask for help for fundraising from him, joint appeals and joint fundraisers, but she didn't get any money directly from his campaign - federal finance law prohibits that. Almost always the winning candidate offers to do whatever they can do legally to help pay down the debt of the losing candidate, Hillary asked for Obama's help fundraising so she could repay those who worked for her - not for her debt.
And Hillary is not weak.