I'm not getting rent deal, Rep. Charles Rangel rages
BY RICHARD SCHAPIRO and ELIZABETH BENJAMIN
DAILY NEWS STAFF WRITERS
Saturday, July 12th 2008, 2:01 AM
Rep. Charles Rangel defiantly defended having four rent-stabilized apartments Friday as Republicans, critics and constituents railed against what they called a sweetheart deal.
"I don't see anything unfair about it, and I didn't even know it was a deal," said Rangel, 78, who chairs the powerful House Ways and Means Committee and is the dean of the New York congressional delegation.
"I did not negotiate or ask for a lower price, and I'm paying the legal rent."
That didn't satisfy Connie Kennedy, 52, who has been living in a rent-stabilized apartment in Rangel's luxury doorman building, Lenox Terrace, for more than 40 years.
"Somebody has to nip this in the bud," she said. "What example do you set for the community by doing that? I have no respect for Rangel."
Nellie Bailey, director of the Harlem Tenants Council, accused Rangel of "the height of hypocrisy."
She said he has failed to help residents being pushed out of rent-stabilized apartments by landlords eager to charge more while enjoying below-market rent.
Rangel - confronted by angry residents at a news conference in front of his building on W.135th St. - said he's unaware of any tenants who have been paying their rent being evicted.
The New York Times reported Rangel pays a total of $3,894 a month for three apartments on the 16th floor plus a fourth apartment six floors down that he uses as a campaign office and pays for with political funds.Rangel said two of the apartments he uses as a residence were combined before he moved in. The third 16th-floor unit, a studio, is separated by a stairwell from the other two.
Critics said Rangel's office violates rent-stabilization regulations because it is not a primary residence. They said his net worth of between $566,000 and $1.2 million makes the apartments eligible for luxury decontrol - at the landlord's discretion.
Rangel said he might consider moving his campaign office if it violates rent rules. But he vowed not to move out of his apartments.
National Republicans issued a press release teeing off on Rangel's "rent-controlled champagne wishes and caviar dreams."
Citizens for Ethics and Responsibility in Washington said it will file complaints against Rangel with the Federal Election Commission and House Ethics Committee to determine if his office is an illegal in-kind contribution from the owner, the Olnick Organization.
Rangel reacted angrily to the suggestion his apartments were a gift.
"Paying the legal rent is not a gift," he declared, calling the Times reporter who had asked the question "stupid.... If anyone can show any remote possibility that this is a gift, I'll resign tomorrow."
Political observers said the disclosure makes Rangel look bad because of the mortgage crisis and the lack of affordable housing in the city.
Still, they said it would not hurt him in the long run because he is a Harlem institution who is routinely reelected with more than 80% of the vote.
"[Rangel] is a populist, liberal character who has always been larger than life," one consultant said. "He has delivered [for constituents] and been a paragon of progressive values.
"Every New Yorker knows somebody who's sitting on a rent-stabilized apartment. It's as New York as bagels."
BY RICHARD SCHAPIRO and ELIZABETH BENJAMIN
DAILY NEWS STAFF WRITERS
Saturday, July 12th 2008, 2:01 AM
Rep. Charles Rangel defiantly defended having four rent-stabilized apartments Friday as Republicans, critics and constituents railed against what they called a sweetheart deal.
"I don't see anything unfair about it, and I didn't even know it was a deal," said Rangel, 78, who chairs the powerful House Ways and Means Committee and is the dean of the New York congressional delegation.
"I did not negotiate or ask for a lower price, and I'm paying the legal rent."
That didn't satisfy Connie Kennedy, 52, who has been living in a rent-stabilized apartment in Rangel's luxury doorman building, Lenox Terrace, for more than 40 years.
"Somebody has to nip this in the bud," she said. "What example do you set for the community by doing that? I have no respect for Rangel."
Nellie Bailey, director of the Harlem Tenants Council, accused Rangel of "the height of hypocrisy."
She said he has failed to help residents being pushed out of rent-stabilized apartments by landlords eager to charge more while enjoying below-market rent.
Rangel - confronted by angry residents at a news conference in front of his building on W.135th St. - said he's unaware of any tenants who have been paying their rent being evicted.
The New York Times reported Rangel pays a total of $3,894 a month for three apartments on the 16th floor plus a fourth apartment six floors down that he uses as a campaign office and pays for with political funds.Rangel said two of the apartments he uses as a residence were combined before he moved in. The third 16th-floor unit, a studio, is separated by a stairwell from the other two.
Critics said Rangel's office violates rent-stabilization regulations because it is not a primary residence. They said his net worth of between $566,000 and $1.2 million makes the apartments eligible for luxury decontrol - at the landlord's discretion.
Rangel said he might consider moving his campaign office if it violates rent rules. But he vowed not to move out of his apartments.
National Republicans issued a press release teeing off on Rangel's "rent-controlled champagne wishes and caviar dreams."
Citizens for Ethics and Responsibility in Washington said it will file complaints against Rangel with the Federal Election Commission and House Ethics Committee to determine if his office is an illegal in-kind contribution from the owner, the Olnick Organization.
Rangel reacted angrily to the suggestion his apartments were a gift.
"Paying the legal rent is not a gift," he declared, calling the Times reporter who had asked the question "stupid.... If anyone can show any remote possibility that this is a gift, I'll resign tomorrow."
Political observers said the disclosure makes Rangel look bad because of the mortgage crisis and the lack of affordable housing in the city.
Still, they said it would not hurt him in the long run because he is a Harlem institution who is routinely reelected with more than 80% of the vote.
"[Rangel] is a populist, liberal character who has always been larger than life," one consultant said. "He has delivered [for constituents] and been a paragon of progressive values.
"Every New Yorker knows somebody who's sitting on a rent-stabilized apartment. It's as New York as bagels."