ford nut
Local nut case
When I first saw this today I was pissed.
But the more you post TwansLS the more I want to hear.
I need the humor today.
The way you type and spell goes hand in hand with the way you think.
Believe it or not
- Thread starter JoeyGood
- Start date
When I first saw this today I was pissed.
But the more you post TwansLS the more I want to hear.
I need the humor today.
The way you type and spell goes hand in hand with the way you think.
Now here's a perfect example of a keyboard warrior. All type. My insult to you was purposeful, Mama's boy, because you offend me with your lemming conspiracy theory crap about 9-11. And you accuse me of believing a lie? What a joke you are, punk. "The truth is out there," but it's not on X-Files, dopey.
NYC LS8
Dedicated LVC Member
I'm calling Jack Bauer and the CTU - look out!
Bob Hubbard
Dedicated LVC Member
When I saw those two buildings crumble, my only thought was, they were wired to explode, and I have not seen much to sway that thinking.
Using the 1993 bombing of the same building, I recall it was bombed from deep in it's foundation, and still the building stood.
Now, we can't dispute the fact that planes did fly into the buildings in 2001 but, I still think, those planes were being used to make spectators think they were the catalyst for the distruction, when in fact the buildings were more than likely wired to explode.
All kinds of engineering probes have looked into the distruction, and how it happened but, I still belive those two buildings were wired to explode.
Just who engineered the distruction is still open to question, but it just seems odd to me that in 1993 the building did not colapse on itself when it's foundation was bombed, but rather 8 years later both buildings collapsed identically from being struck in the top 1/3rd of the buildings.
Just doesn't make any sense too me.
Bob.
Using the 1993 bombing of the same building, I recall it was bombed from deep in it's foundation, and still the building stood.
Now, we can't dispute the fact that planes did fly into the buildings in 2001 but, I still think, those planes were being used to make spectators think they were the catalyst for the distruction, when in fact the buildings were more than likely wired to explode.
All kinds of engineering probes have looked into the distruction, and how it happened but, I still belive those two buildings were wired to explode.
Just who engineered the distruction is still open to question, but it just seems odd to me that in 1993 the building did not colapse on itself when it's foundation was bombed, but rather 8 years later both buildings collapsed identically from being struck in the top 1/3rd of the buildings.
Just doesn't make any sense too me.
Bob.
Bob Hubbard
Dedicated LVC Member
I stand corrected.
In the post above I said wired to "explode," when I should have said "implode"
Bob.
In the post above I said wired to "explode," when I should have said "implode"
Bob.
MonsterMark
Dedicated LVC Member
Hey Bob. I just finished making a real nice tin-foil hat. It is a sombrero style hat to keep all the radio waves from entering your ears. I need your address so I can send it to you UPS. Should I include some ducktape to keep from your head from 'exploding' too?
Bob Hubbard
Dedicated LVC Member
In my post above it appears that I may have left the impression with some that I thought it was government sponsored, and that the planes did not cause the distruction.
Let me set you straight as to what I think.
It is absurd to think the government conspired to do this as a rouse for going into Iraq.
I DO however still belive the buildings were wired, and that could have been done by a well organized terriorist group.
I watch the video that was posted in the beginning of this thread, then I spent the last hour looking at what I taped on 9/11, and I definetely see some discrepencies.
In the video posted, the clips that were shown, appear to show a small flash of light just before both planes hit the buildings.
Further, some stated the plane, or planes had no windows.
In my tape, after using slow motion, and frame by frame, and zooming in, there are no flashes of light as in the posted video, and the planes do have windows.
Also the announcer on the posted video stated that it appeared that some sort of cylinder looked as thought it was on the bottom of the fusilarge.
Not so in my video, on either of the planes.
Iam not sure what that announcer is trying to proove, but it just seems strange looking at that video, then my video, and I don't see what he does.
One more point needs to be brought up here concerning the video posted in this thread.
This terriorist act was a complete surprise to the nation, and without provication, there would be no need for cameras to be filming the trade center, at the time but, this posted video shows the planes hitting the buildings at four or five different angles.
How, without obvious photo, and video editing do you suppossed that little feat was pulled off?
That video is pure and simple bull sh!t.
At this point, I rule out government conspiracy, but I most definetely think the buildings were wired to implode.
Bob.
Let me set you straight as to what I think.
It is absurd to think the government conspired to do this as a rouse for going into Iraq.
I DO however still belive the buildings were wired, and that could have been done by a well organized terriorist group.
I watch the video that was posted in the beginning of this thread, then I spent the last hour looking at what I taped on 9/11, and I definetely see some discrepencies.
In the video posted, the clips that were shown, appear to show a small flash of light just before both planes hit the buildings.
Further, some stated the plane, or planes had no windows.
In my tape, after using slow motion, and frame by frame, and zooming in, there are no flashes of light as in the posted video, and the planes do have windows.
Also the announcer on the posted video stated that it appeared that some sort of cylinder looked as thought it was on the bottom of the fusilarge.
Not so in my video, on either of the planes.
Iam not sure what that announcer is trying to proove, but it just seems strange looking at that video, then my video, and I don't see what he does.
One more point needs to be brought up here concerning the video posted in this thread.
This terriorist act was a complete surprise to the nation, and without provication, there would be no need for cameras to be filming the trade center, at the time but, this posted video shows the planes hitting the buildings at four or five different angles.
How, without obvious photo, and video editing do you suppossed that little feat was pulled off?
That video is pure and simple bull sh!t.
At this point, I rule out government conspiracy, but I most definetely think the buildings were wired to implode.
Bob.
atleast Bob isnt a complete fuhck tard like some people on here. well since i dont sit on my ass all day long and live on these forums i cant laugh at your dumbass posts all day. sorry i dont have a phd in typing. u can sit back and let your constitution and bill of rights be taken from u but i wont. have fun guys.
Marcus
Dedicated LVC Member
Indeed.
Fossten, for as much as you piss me off 99 percent of the time, you really do have me rolling on the floor on occasion.
For example, I just about snorked Mountain Dew all over my keyboard when I read this one at work today:
Maybe it's just the fact that the sarcasm isn't being directed at me. Who knows?
Could you make at least one statement that you can support?
Let's hear those theories, tell us what happened.
Enlighten us. Surely you'll be able to provide a plausible explanation for what happened that's consistent with the impartial data available (which so effectively proves what happened).
So who did it? How'd they do it? Why'd they do it?
Was it the CFR, the new world order? Was it Skull and Crossbones? Haliburton? The Illuminati? The Bilderberg? Or have you yet to figure out the who,what, why? Or is it that you just don't understand the world and would prefer to attribute it to a conspiracy because it helps you make sense of things.
Let's debate your point. If you can bring something new to the discussion, that's great. Just don't slink away now and blame us for your inability to make or support your world view.
So what's happening in 2012? The Mayan Comet or One World Government.
fossten
Dedicated LVC Member
I've always been eager to hear how ChimpyMcBush!tler arranged the demolition of the twin towers without one person coming forward. Knowing how willing the New York Times is to expose national security secrets, you'd think at least one person would want his shot at fame, a la Joe Wilson.
the american government has ever done anything to harm it's citizens.
http://www.abovetopsecret.com/forum/thread59987/pg1
you're a stick in the mud to think it's preposterous. i'm not implying that the government was responsible, but it's not beyond implausible.
http://www.abovetopsecret.com/forum/thread59987/pg1
you're a stick in the mud to think it's preposterous. i'm not implying that the government was responsible, but it's not beyond implausible.