ARE we to ASSUME...?

JoeyGood

Dedicated LVC Member
Joined
Dec 16, 2005
Messages
524
Reaction score
0
Location
Bronx
With all the fake photos and staged footage are we to assume that the Israel/Hezbollah conflict is being made to look worse than it is to support favoritism toward one side? Just confused about this whole thing since it was supposedly started as a religious war but now it's more of a hillbilly feud of who gets more land :confused:
 
JoeyGood said:
With all the fake photos and staged footage are we to assume that the Israel/Hezbollah conflict is being made to look worse than it is to support favoritism toward one side? Just confused about this whole thing since it was supposedly started as a religious war but now it's more of a hillbilly feud of who gets more land :confused:

This isn't about land. The Israelis gave up a bunch of land 6 years ago in an effort to get peace, and all they got for it was a few thousand rockets.

If you pay even scant attention to the language used by Islamo-fascists and terrorists, it will be clear to you that their goal isn't to annex land like Hitler, but to kill Jews and Americans.
 
fossten said:
This isn't about land. The Israelis gave up a bunch of land 6 years ago in an effort to get peace, and all they got for it was a few thousand rockets.

If you pay even scant attention to the language used by Islamo-fascists and terrorists, it will be clear to you that their goal isn't to annex land like Hitler, but to kill Jews and Americans.

OK maybe i should have put more detail in it but listen to my crazy thinking and see if it makes any sense

1. With all the fake photos and staged footage = propaganda
2. Blowing out bridges and roads (trying to trap in or keep in) = camps
3. (see #2) not being able to roam where they once did = same as taking land

sound familiar? Yes it does cuz you named him. <---sarcasm

Now which one is better who should we root for? Well i don't know

Remember when it used to be I'll trade you 2 of your POW's for 2 of my POW's?

Just soooo :confused:

If we concentrated more on locking down the US and making sure of who is coming and going we wouldn't need to send our troops anywhere to fix other peoples problems and we would be able to better protect ourselves against terrorists here on our own land. but that would open an other can of worms which would best described with one phrase POLICE STATE

We just can't win no matter which way we go about things IMO
 
JoeyGood said:
OK maybe i should have put more detail in it but listen to my crazy thinking and see if it makes any sense

1. With all the fake photos and staged footage = propaganda
2. Blowing out bridges and roads (trying to trap in or keep in) = camps
3. (see #2) not being able to roam where they once did = same as taking land

sound familiar? Yes it does cuz you named him. <---sarcasm

Now which one is better who should we root for? Well i don't know
Are you seriously drawing a moral equivalency between terrorism, sponsored by Iran, and Israel, a democratic and free society?

Remember when it used to be I'll trade you 2 of your POW's for 2 of my POW's?
But this is terrorist warfare. The Islamic nations are fighting wars through proxy organizations like Hezbolah.

If we concentrated more on locking down the US and making sure of who is coming and going we wouldn't need to send our troops anywhere to fix other peoples problems and we would be able to better protect ourselves against terrorists here on our own land. but that would open an other can of worms which would best described with one phrase POLICE STATE
It's not possible. We can't "lock down" the country.

And because of partisan liberals, they don't think the NSA should listen to the international phone calls of people linked to terrorism, or for the CIA to track financial transactions over seas.

We can't hide from this threat. It will find us. We can't retreat from it, because it will follow us.

We just can't win no matter which way we go about things IMO
We can address it directly with passion, strength and conviction. We can acknowledge that we have been pulled into a world war and that we need to defeat our enemy. We can do it now, before they have even greater ability and weapons. We can deal with the problem during our life time so that future generations don't have to.

And we can support our ALLIES who have also been forced into this war and are being attacked by this enemy.
 
Calabrio said:
Are you seriously drawing a moral equivalency between terrorism, sponsored by Iran, and Israel, a democratic and free society?

No not really. It was meant differently then what it sounded like. (toward the the propaganda) <--- my sarcasm again

Calabrio said:
But this is terrorist warfare. The Islamic nations are fighting wars through proxy organizations like Hezbolah.

Yes it is but we didn't get as involved as now

Calabrio said:
It's not possible. We can't "lock down" the country.

And because of partisan liberals, they don't think the NSA should listen to the international phone calls of people linked to terrorism, or for the CIA to track financial transactions over seas.

We can't hide from this threat. It will find us. We can't retreat from it, because it will follow us. ?

SOOOO well said about the partisan liberals but we can KICK AZZ better than we are doing when it does find us instead of letting all this Politically Correct crap getting in the way. WAR IS WAR and there will be casualties IMO

Calabrio said:
We can address it directly with passion, strength and conviction. We can acknowledge that we have been pulled into a world war and that we need to defeat our enemy. We can do it now, before they have even greater ability and weapons. We can deal with the problem during our life time so that future generations don't have to.

And we can support our ALLIES who have also been forced into this war and are being attacked by this enemy.

HA ALLIES! that's a good one. When one of them gets punched in the nose they come running to DADDY but when we need them no one stands up and says WE'LL HELP. They have to be asked to do so and some decline when asked to do so. Again i say HA ALLIES! It basically all gets left up to us in the end either helping or getting help.
 
Washington will get nuked and we'll lose our command and control and fall like a house a cards to the terrorists. The 50 States will be left to fend for themselves.
 
JoeyGood said:
HA ALLIES! that's a good one. When one of them gets punched in the nose they come running to DADDY but when we need them no one stands up and says WE'LL HELP. They have to be asked to do so and some decline when asked to do so. Again i say HA ALLIES! It basically all gets left up to us in the end either helping or getting help.

Israel has been a pretty strong ally.
Britain and the United States have always had a strong relationship.

As for the rest of Old Europe.... that's a different story. Europe is a dead culture struggling to maintain relevance in the world. They're socialist economies are limiting the ability for the underclasses to prosper. And they have growing, frustrated, muslim populations.

Despite this, countries like France would rather challenge American dominance than address the problems brewing in their streets. It's only a matter of time before the violence in the Middle East spills into the streets of France, similar to the riots that took place last year.

And, you're right, when the Islamic threat is on the brink of destroying Europe, and France has already surrendered, they'll be crying for us to save them again. Rather than addressing the threat of Islamo-Nazis now, before they are armed with nuclear weapons, they'll hide their head in the sand and go the appeasement route until it's too late.

I mentioned the Barbary Pirates in another thread. Unfortunately, the points were lost on Medium, here's a cliftnote version: after the U.S. declared independence from the British, we were no longer under the protection of the British Navy. The ISLAMIC barbary coast pirates would then target U.S. ships, enslave the crews and passengers and either sell them into slavery in Africa, or ransom them back.

In order to avoid this, the U.S. would pay off the Muslim Pirates in the form of tribute. Thomas Jefferson was vocally critical of the plan, rightfully arguing that this policy was bad and that it would only lead to more terror on the seas. But the United States was weak and broke after the revolution was over and the government felt there was nothing it could do but pay. But by 1800, we were developing a very respectable and formidable Navy.

When Jefferson became President, they demanded an additional payment. Jefferson refused. The Tripolli, Morocco, Algiers, and Tunis essentially declared war on the U.S.

Jefferson sent a group of frigates into the region.

A couple of the countries immediately backed down. The other two were blockaded and their fleets were attacked.

Unfortunately, the muslims started pulling this crap again while the U.S. was tied up with the War of 1812, lacking the resources necessary to fight them. But once that war was over, Madison sent over 10 ships to put things right, through the use of force, and even collected reperations from the Muslims.


What amazes me is that while virtually everyone knows that Jefferson probably had a longterm relationship with a slave, they don't know how we've been dealing with Islamic threats since the birth of this country.
 
That Barbary Coast Pirate story just absolutely fascinated me. And it astounds me that I had never heard anything about it until I was listening to a lecture being given by Christopher Hitchens on CSPAN, which then motivated me to do some further research.

It is a fascinating story and so important to recognize. Jefferson argued "Look, we're not a theocracy, why do you continue to attack us." And he was basically told, "It doesn't matter, your infidel. We are completely justified by the Koran to kill you or enslave you."

Paying them off didn't work, it just made them bolder.

There was a remarkable slogan that I think originated during that period too
"Millions for defense but not one cent in tribute."
 

Members online

Back
Top