Pollster says election could end in landslide

MonsterMark

Dedicated LVC Member
Joined
Mar 2, 2004
Messages
9,018
Reaction score
3
Location
United States
Having deployed my newly donated tin-foil hat, (thanks Dude), here is another pollster voicing the same 'potential' opinion I have held. This election as it stands now will not be close. The barbs at Obama have not even been tossed yet.

Presidential Election
 
It's called voter fraud perpetrated by ACORN.

They'll try.
But between the Bradley Effect and just a natural tendency to make the safe choice when in the voting both in uncertain times, Obama has a challenge ahead of him, despite any positive polling.

Some pollster are saying that Obama needs an 8 point polling lead to actually win on election day.
 
They'll try.
But between the Bradley Effect and just a natural tendency to make the safe choice when in the voting both in uncertain times, Obama has a challenge ahead of him, despite any positive polling.

Some pollster are saying that Obama needs an 8 point polling lead to actually win on election day.
Do you really believe the Bradley effect holds water?
 
If Obama can convey a detailed and substantive vision that that the American people can get behind (like Reagan) he wins. If not, McCain wins.

The problem is, when it comes to vision, Obama is no Reagan. He, his politics and the vision apparant from his actions are to the left of George McGovern (who lost to in a huge landslide to Nixon in the 1972 election). So, in a country where the electorate is center-right, typical of all modern Democratic presidential nominiees, Obama's 'vision' that he conveys is very vague and much different then his actual agenda and only serves as a smokescreen to cover that agenda, as this op-ed shows.

If Obama cannot convey that substantive vision that the American people can get behind (and it is highly doubtful that he can), then the voters will go for the "comfortable old shoe" that is John McCain, who would win rather comfortably.

I think Zogby is right that this election won't break one way or the other until the last couple weeks, like the Reagan/Carter election in 1980 (broke for Reagan in the final week).

Of course, in both the Nixon/Mondale race in 1972, and the Reagan/Carter race in 1980, there was an incumbant running, which is not the case in this election...
 
Do you really believe the Bradley effect holds water?

Yes I do.
A lot of people, particularly the North Eastern styled liberals with their "white guilt" really want to say, "I am voting for the black guy," but won't.

And it's not because he's black, simply because he's not as good... but they still want to say they support them, because it makes them feel better about themselves.
 
I heard a theory today that the reason the Dems are so stubborn about giving all this bailout money to ACORN is as payback for ACORN promising to deliver enough fraudulent votes to hand the election to the Dems.
 

Members online

No members online now.
Back
Top