Operation Eagle Eyes

FreeFaller

USAF LS8
Joined
Nov 22, 2004
Messages
1,213
Reaction score
0
Location
Belleville, IL
Useful information in being a part of the fight against Terrorism. These are things all of us as Americans should know. Made for the military but it can apply to civvies...

Eagle Eyes Program

Categories of Suspicious Activities

Surveillance: Someone recording or monitoring activities. This may include the use of cameras (either still or video), note taking, drawing diagrams, annotating on maps, or using binoculars or other vision-enhancing devices.

Elicitation: People or organizations attempting to gain information about military operations, capabilities, or people. Elicitation attempts may be made by mail, fax, telephone, or in person. Examples could include being approached at a gas station (or mall or airport or library, etc) and asked about what's happening at the base; getting a fax (or an e-mail or a telephone call, etc) asking for troop strength numbers... or the number of airplanes on base... or deployment procedures... or how a trash-collection truck gets on base... or the location of the HQ building... or how many people live in a certain dorm... or where the commander lives... or how many people hang out at the officers/enlisted club at night... or which nightclubs/restaurants off base are highly frequented by military people... or the workings of the base's network firewall, etc.

Tests of security: Any attempts to measure reaction times to security breaches or to penetrate physical security barriers or procedures in order to assess strengths and weaknesses. Examples: a person grabs the base fence and shakes it and sees how long it takes for police to respond; a driver approaches the front gate (without ID and/or car sticker) and pretends to be lost or to have taken a wrong term, just to learn the procedures of how he is dealt with and how far into the gate he can get before being turned around; a person places a "smoke bomb" near the fence or throws it over the fence, just to learn how quickly police respond and what effect that has on front-gate operations, etc.

Acquiring supplies: Purchasing or stealing explosives, weapons, ammunition, detonators, timers, etc. Also includes acquiring military uniforms, decals, flight manuals, passes or badges (or the equipment to manufacture such items) or any other controlled items.

Suspicious persons out of place: People who don’t seem to belong in the workplace, neighborhood, business establishment, or anywhere else. Includes suspicious border crossings and stowaways aboard ship or people jumping ship in port. This category is hard to define, but the point is that people know what looks right and what doesn't look right in their neighborhoods, office spaces, commutes, etc, and if a person just doesn't seem like he or she belongs, there's probably a reason for that.

Dry run: Putting people into position and moving them around according to their plan without actually committing the terrorist act. This is especially true when planning a kidnapping, but it can also pertain to bombings. An element of this activity could also include mapping out routes and determining the timing of traffic lights and flow. Take note of people moving around from place to place without any apparent purpose and doing it, perhaps, many times. The appropriate example here is the Sept. 11 hijackers, who are now known to have actually flown on those exact flights several times before Sept. 11. Their purpose was to practice getting their people into position, working out arrival times, parking, ticketing, going through security, boarding, etc. By taking note of everything around them, in one sense they were conducting surveillance and testing security, but they were also doing a dry run of the actual activity.

Deploying assets: People and supplies getting into position to commit the act. This is a person’s last chance to alert authorities before the terrorist act occurs. Look for people loading up vehicles with weaponry/explosives, etc, and/or parking that vehicle somewhere, or people in military uniforms (who don't look right) approaching an installation or getting into a vehicle, or people who seem out of place standing by at a certain location as if waiting for something to happen. One fairly good example of this is the attack on the Khobar Towers in Saudi Arabia. When the explosives-laden truck pulled up to the fence line (which was the "deploying assets" step) and the driver jumped out and ran away, that was seen by a spotter on the roof of the dormitory, who recognized this as suspicious activity. He then sprinted down stairs and began pounding on doors, rousting people out of bed and getting them out of the building. Because of that, he saved many, many lives, and it's all because he recognized the "deploying assets" element.
 
You say American's should get involved more with America. That is not a bad idea. But if you start asking everyday people to look for terrorist, you're going to have many people pointing fingers to anyone with brownish skin or sporting a beard. Because unfortunately, that is the imagine given to us.
 
95DevilleNS said:
You say American's should get involved more with America. That is not a bad idea. But if you start asking everyday people to look for terrorist, you're going to have many people pointing fingers to anyone with brownish skin or sporting a beard. Because unfortunately, that is the imagine given to us.

Not if they follow the instructions.
 
Calabrio said:
Not if they follow the instructions.


Two reasons why your statement is flawed.

1) People have trouble following the instruction on the opening of a can of peanuts, I fear how they would interpret anti-terrorist how-to's.

2) That would require 'larger' government, from what I read the conservatives in here are always bashing the liberals for wanting it.


Anyhow, FreeFallers idea isn't moronic, I just don't see it working out.
 
95DevilleNS said:
Two reasons why your statement is flawed.

1) People have trouble following the instruction on the opening of a can of peanuts, I fear how they would interpret anti-terrorist how-to's.

2) That would require 'larger' government, from what I read the conservatives in here are always bashing the liberals for wanting it.


Anyhow, FreeFallers idea isn't moronic, I just don't see it working out.

That is typical of the liberal elite. They assume that the American people are stupid and have to have everything decided for them.
 
fossten said:
That is typical of the liberal elite. They assume that the American people are stupid and have to have everything decided for them.

no...it's typical of those who've had to deal with the public. After working for 10 years in technical support I understand why a pack of razors has a "If you have problems using our product Call:" number on it.

Why the heck do you think Orange Juice says 'Shake before use' on the side or hemorrhoid cream comes with a warning that says 'Do Not Use Orally'?
 
raVeneyes said:
no...it's typical of those who've had to deal with the public. After working for 10 years in technical support I understand why a pack of razors has a "If you have problems using our product Call:" number on it.

Why the heck do you think Orange Juice says 'Shake before use' on the side or hemorrhoid cream comes with a warning that says 'Do Not Use Orally'?

Wrong again. It's for ONE REASON, AND ONE REASON ONLY: To prevent the company from being sued in a class action by money-hungry lawyers who will get their millions up front while the 'injured' parties get pennies on the dollar.
 
fossten said:
That is typical of the liberal elite. They assume that the American people are stupid and have to have everything decided for them.

Lol.... You never fail to twist & turn.... Thanks for the laugh though.
 

Members online

No members online now.
Back
Top