Only 6 more days till the October Surprise!

Bush%20Laden.jpg


The truth about Bin Laden?
 
Hey Bryan,

Your credibility is suffering again.

Let's see, you've been sworn to secrecy. Six days from October 9th is October 15th. Today is the 22nd of October and still no announcement.

Did we all miss something?
 
barry2952 said:
Hey Bryan,

Your credibility is suffering again.

Let's see, you've been sworn to secrecy. Six days from October 9th is October 15th. Today is the 22nd of October and still no announcement.

Did we all miss something?
Click to expand...
Yes, you missed MonsterMark's announcnement on the 15th. Sorry, here's the link so you too get to read his amazing Bush announcnement:
http://www.lincolnvscadillac.com/showthread.php?t=2518
:thread:
 
That link is just to his thread about Edwards being a "snake-oil salesman". So what "announcement"?
As for the Bush administration all of a sudden producing a freshly captured Bin Laden, I think it would be a mistake this late in the game to do it. It would back-fire on them now. Too close to the election to maintain credibility.
 
I apologize guys. Pinning the tail on this jackass has been alot more difficult that I first thought. Kerry is very well connected and the perfect double agent hasn't been found to 'leak' the facts.

Here is the brunt of it. There are several fronts being looked into with this guy.

1) It appears that Kerry may have received a less-than-honorable discharge from the military and has gone to great lengths to cover it up. I have reached a dead end with the documents that are available and there is still one piece of the puzzle missing, so now I am forced to wait for the decision from the lawsuit filed by the Judicial Watch for the release of all of Kerry's records.

2) Kerry's family business dealing and connections with the Korean government are very disturbing to say the least. They make the Bush/oil, Cheney/Halliburton accusations pale in comparison. There has just been nobody that has checked into this guys past and an under-manned effort is only now starting. But the detail is astounding and explains why Kerry would favor a unilateral negotiation with their government.

3) One Navy document has already been turned up that implicates Kerry by a process of elimination that proves Kerry wrote up his own reports that garnered him the Purple Heart and Silver Star. Still trying to find the other after-action reports that link him to the other awards.

There are a couple less egregious ones that really aren't worth mentioning at this time.

So in conclusion, I have let myself down and I know 10's of millions of Americans that may now wind up with a Kerry presidency and a much more dangerous and uncertain future. Proving the less-than-honorable discharge now appears to be out of reach and time has run out for that revelation to have much of an impact on this election.

Gloat if you may at my failure,
icon9.gif
but rest assured, the truth will come out, albeit, maybe after the donkey has already soiled the chair, but it'll come out.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
You should.
icon12.gif
I wasted a month of my life. I am near tears and totally devastated. Oh, whoa is me!

On a happy note, I did set a personal best fundraising for Shrub this past week.
 
MonsterMark said:
You should.
icon12.gif
I wasted a month of my life. I am near tears and totally devastated. Oh, whoa is me!

On a happy note, I did set a personal best fundraising for Shrub this past week.
Click to expand...
and with that, I say we officially put this thread to rest. Some day everyone will forget.
 
What are you going to do after Nov. 2nd. What will you have to post about. The elections will be over and no matter who wins.... :F

Are you going to join Sifrino and Pepperman in their battle for girls LOL.

How long can they keep that up LOL. :GotPics:
 
I'll address each of these........

1) There is no such thing as a "less-than-honorable" discharge from the US military. It is either "Honorable", or "General" discharge. If you don't get one of those two, odds are you have been court-marshalled. Considering Kerry's view at the time, I wouldn't be suprised if he was denied an "Honorable" discharge. But then again, most voters don't care what Kerry did 30 yrs ago (and Bush is lucky most votors don't care about what HE did 30 yrs ago either).

2) That would be interesting, however I can't envision anything being nearly as indicting / damaging / covert as Bush's family dealings w/ the Saudis and his use of executive power to sell our soldiers blood for oil.

3) He said she said they said. BFD. See the last sentence of 1) above.
:F
 
Either way I win.

Bush wins and I can continuously brag about his accomplishments and pontificate about how wonderful he is.

Kerry wins and I can beeotch and whine over every mundane mistake he makes in his Presidency. So I guess I will be posting daily.
icon12.gif

It a good thing I don't have a real job. (according to Thereeeza). Gives me alot of time to entertain and keep you guys informed.
 
I have a hard time believing that "nobody" has dug into Kerry's background. If there were anything there, we would've heard about it by now. And as for the mysterious specifics of his discharge, there are four common types of military discharges: honorable, general, undesirable, and dishonorable. Undesirable and general discharges are given for a variety of reasons, and may or may not indicate that the discharged individual was found guilty of an offense. A dishonorable discharge, on the other hand, is given only to individuals whose guilt has been adjudicated. The EEOC and the courts treat less-than-honorable discharges resulting from an adjudication of guilt the same as a conviction. That is, there should be a review of the length of time since the discharge, the nature and seriousness of the underlying offense, and the relationship of the nature of the offense to the particular job applied for. If, however, an individual has received an undesirable or general discharge but has not been convicted of an offense, the discharge is, like an arrest, not an indication of guilt, and may therefore not be used as an employment disqualification.
 
JohnnyBz00LS said:
1) There is no such thing as a "less-than-honorable" discharge from the US military. It is either "Honorable", or "General" discharge. If you don't get one of those two, odds are you have been court-marshalled. Considering Kerry's view at the time, I wouldn't be suprised if he was denied an "Honorable" discharge. But then again, most voters don't care what Kerry did 30 yrs ago (and Bush is lucky most votors don't care about what HE did 30 yrs ago either).
Click to expand...
Wrong again! And what do we have for our winner behind door number 3?

Types of military discharges are... Drumroll please.......................

HONORABLE

GENERAL

O-T-H (Other-Than-Honorable)

BAD CONDUCT

DISHONORABLE

Please don't confuse your version of fiction from fact.

I use the term "less than" as a condescending attempt to diminish the great Pretender Kerry from mASSachusetts. The word 'less' being the key word here.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
MonsterMark said:
Wrong again! And what do we have for our winner behind door number 3?

Types of military discharges are... Drumroll please.......................

HONORABLE

GENERAL

O-T-H (Other-Than-Honorable)

BAD CONDUCT

DISHONORABLE

Please don't confuse your version of fiction from fact.

I use the term "less than" as a condescending attempt to diminish the great Pretender Kerry from mASSachusetts. The word 'less' being the key word here.
Click to expand...

Not sure where you got your facts but there are only (4) types of discharges as I listed in my last post.
Oh, BTW Bryan, this is a good site for you, maybe you'll like it:
http://justoneminute.typepad.com/main/2004/04/airbrushing_joh.html
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Members online

No members online now.
Total: 52 (members: 0, guests: 52)
Back
Top