Al Qaeda Supports McCain/Palin

[JohnnyBz00LS]

Al Qaeda-Linked Web Site Backs McCain for President

http://elections.foxnews.com/2008/10/22/al-qaeda-linked-web-site-backs-mccain-president/

WASHINGTON -- Al Qaeda supporters suggested in a Web site message this week they would welcome a pre-election terror attack on the U.S. as a way to usher in a McCain presidency.

The message, posted Monday on the password-protected al-Hesbah Web site, said if Al Qaeda wants to exhaust the United States militarily and economically, "impetuous" Republican presidential candidate Sen. John McCain is the better choice because he is more likely to continue the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan.

"This requires presence of an impetuous American leader such as McCain, who pledged to continue the war till the last American soldier," the message said. "Then, Al Qaeda will have to support McCain in the coming elections so that he continues the failing march of his predecessor, Bush."

SITE Intelligence Group, based in Bethesda, Maryland, monitors the Web site and translated the message.

"If Al Qaeda carries out a big operation against American interests," the message said, "this act will be support of McCain because it will push the Americans deliberately to vote for McCain so that he takes revenge for them against Al Qaeda. Al Qaeda then will succeed in exhausting America till its last year in it."

Hmmm, where have we heard THIS before?

http://www.globalresearch.ca/index.php?context=va&aid=9439

McCain Campaign: "Another terrorist attack on the U.S. would be a 'big advantage' for the Republican presidential candidate"

McCain aide explains how America could benefit from a Second 9/11. a terrorist attack would benefit the McCain campaign.

McCain disavows aide's comment about terrorism

By GLEN JOHNSON, Associated Press Writer

FRESNO, Calif. - A top adviser to John McCain said another terrorist attack on U.S. soil would be a "big advantage" for the Republican presidential candidate, drawing a sharp rebuke Monday from both the presumed GOP nominee and Democrat Barack Obama.

Charlie Black, already in the spotlight for his past lobbying work, is quoted in the upcoming July 7 edition of Fortune magazine as saying such an attack "certainly would be a big advantage to him." Black said Monday he regretted the comment.

Black is also quoted as saying the "unfortunate event" of the assassination of former Pakistani leader Benazir Bhutto in December 2007 "helped us."

I agree with Stincoln, we should invite attack. Heck, we should embrace it. Let the chips fall where they may I say. Hell, we ALL know Obama is unqualified. What's the big deal with a few attacks here and there. It will give Obama a chance to gain some 'street-cred'.

So now the RWWs WANT the US to be attacked! TRAITORS!!

 

[StincolnLincoln]

Good stuff Johnny

 

[TheDude]

"A top adviser to John McCain said another terrorist attack on U.S. soil would be a "big advantage" for the Republican presidential candidate"

Maybe this is that "October surprize" from the Right we keep hearing about.

 

[Calabrio]

As a falling stock market helps Obama.... And everyone in that campaign is comfortable pointing that out. Political realities, both these events play off the different candidates perceived strengths.

As for Al-Queda.... whatever you do, don't throw me into the briar patch!!! Actually, I say that, but it's not even that important. Whether they were being serious or deceptive, that sounds like a posting made by a sympathizer...

Markos:
"This requires presence of an impetuous American leader such as McCain, who pledged to continue the war till the last American soldier," the message said. "Then, Al Qaeda will have to support McCain in the coming elections so that he continues the failing march of his predecessor, Bush."

Obama:
ROTFLMAO!!! LOLOLO!!!!
Post some pictures of your sheep!!!
SOGTFO

 

[fossten]

Speaker of Iranian Parliament supports Hopenchange:

“We are leaning more in favor of Barack Obama because he is more flexible and rational, even though we know American policy will not change that much,” Larijani said at a press conference during a visit to Bahrain…

Larijani, a leading figure in the conservative camp in Iran, also said the United States was too busy dealing with the global financial crisis to consider waging an attack on Iran.

“The risk was low before,” he said. “But now I am 100% certain that the United States will not unleash a war against Iran. The economic crisis has cost the United States $1.4 trillion and Washington is working to resolve its internal problems and not a war.”

Hamas Endorses Obama

On Sunday, Aaron Klein and John Batchelor interviewed Ahmed Yousef, chief political adviser to the Prime Minister of Hamas, on WABC radio. The interview produced a scoop which, for some reason, has not been widely publicized: Hamas has endorsed Barack Obama for President. Yousef said, "We like Mr. Obama and we hope he will win the election." Why? "He has a vision to change America." Maybe Yousef has some insight into what Obama means by all these vague references to "change."

Of course, Hamas's taste in American presidents is suspect. Yousef also described Jimmy Carter, who was about to pay a call on Hamas when the interview was taped, as "this noble man" who "did an excellent job as President."

Yousef was asked about Obama's condemnation of Carter's visit with Hamas, but didn't seem troubled by it. Hamas, he says, understands American politics; this is the election season, and everyone wants to sound like a friend of Israel. Nevertheless, he hopes that the Democrats will change American policies when they take office.