If that is truly the case, it is the first State in the Union to have such a law to my knowledge. In other states I have lived in, intentionally misrepresenting an item for sale is known as fraud. Now, if the seller uses vague words like 'mint' or 'reliable' then it is simple salesmanship, but if they hide a major known problem (bad tranny, rod knock, etc.), or tell you it does not burn a drop of oil, when it fact burns a quart every 50 yards. they can be held liable for repair or refund to the extent that the property value is diminished. Not saying the courts always grant that relief, but the process is available.
As a general rule, if the item does not perform the basic function for which it was intended (in a reasonable way), then the seller can be liable to make good on the deal if they have misrepresented the item.
edit below;
I would be curious to read the applicable sections of law, please give your source of that information (statute numbers would be great, thanks in advance CB.)