FBI thinks paying cash for coffe means your a terrorist.

'Minuscule threat': Radical US Muslims pose little danger, study says

Of about 14,000 murders last year, not a single one resulted from Islamic extremism, according to report's author

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/46306629/ns/us_news-the_new_york_times/

A feared wave of homegrown terrorism by radicalized Muslim Americans has not materialized, with plots and arrests dropping sharply over the two years since an unusual peak in 2009, according to a new study by a North Carolina research group.
The study, to be released on Wednesday, found that 20 Muslim Americans were charged in violent plots or attacks in 2011, down from 26 in 2010 and a spike of 47 in 2009.
Charles Kurzman, the author of the report for the Triangle Center on Terrorism and Homeland Security, called terrorism by Muslim Americans “a minuscule threat to public safety.”
Of about 14,000 murders in the United States last year, not a single one resulted from Islamic extremism, said Mr. Kurzman, a professor of sociology at the University of North Carolina.
The report also found that no single ethnic group predominated among Muslims charged in terrorism cases last year — six were of Arab ancestry, five were white, three were African-American and two were Iranian, Mr. Kurzman said. That pattern of ethnic diversity has held for those arrested since Sept. 11, 2001, he said.
Forty percent of those charged in 2011 were converts to Islam, Mr. Kurzman found, slightly higher than the 35 percent of those charged since the 2001 attacks.
His new report is based on the continuation of research he conducted for a book he published last year, “The Missing Martyrs: Why There Are So Few Muslim Terrorists.”
The decline in cases since 2009 has come as a relief to law enforcement and counterterrorism officials. In that year, the authorities were surprised by a series of terrorist plots or attacks, including the killing of 13 people at Fort Hood, Tex., by an Army psychiatrist who had embraced radical Islam, Maj. Nidal Hasan.
The upsurge in domestic plots two years ago prompted some scholars of violent extremism to question the conventional wisdom that Muslims in the United States, with higher levels of education and income than the average American, were not susceptible to the message of Al Qaeda.
Danger of radicalization
Concerns grew after the May 2010 arrest of Faisal Shahzad, a naturalized American citizen, for trying to blow up a sport utility vehicle in Times Square.
Mr. Shahzad had worked as a financial analyst and seemed thoroughly assimilated. In a dramatic courtroom speech after pleading guilty, he blamed American military action in Muslim countries for his militancy.
The string of cases fueled wide and often contentious discussion of the danger of radicalization among American Muslims, including Congressional hearings led by Representative Peter T. King, a Long Island Republican and chairman of the House Committee on Homeland Security.
But the number of cases declined, returning to the rough average of about 20 Muslim Americans accused of extremist violence per year that has prevailed since the 2001 attacks, with 193 people in that category over the decade.
By Mr. Kurzman’s count, 462 other Muslim Americans have been charged since 2001 for nonviolent crimes in support of terrorism, including financing and making false statements.
The 2011 cases include just one actual series of attacks, which caused no injuries, involving rifle shots fired late at night at military buildings in Northern Virginia.
A former Marine Corps reservist, Yonathan Melaku, pleaded guilty in the case last month in an agreement that calls for a 25-year prison sentence.
Other plots unearthed by law enforcement last year and listed in Mr. Kurzman’s report included a suspected Iranian plan to assassinate the Saudi ambassador to the United States, a scheme to attack a Shiite mosque in Michigan and another to blow up synagogues, churches and the Empire State Building.
“Fortunately, very few of these people are competent and very few get to the stage of preparing an attack without coming to the attention of the authorities,” Mr. Kurzman said.

_______________________________________________________________

Law enforcement is always suspicious of cash because it's not snoop friendly.
Fearmongering is an effectve rhetorical device of the unscrupulous.
Certainly no stiff upper lip from easily cowed Americans.
Home of the Brave?
The cops love going after common criminals by classifying them as "terrorists" so they can use secret methods that don't require warrants or judicial oversight.
 
Let's see, the World Trade Center counted for how many? The Pentagon how many, the third 'plane how many? and, of course all the plots that didn't work---Seattle...

KS
 
Let's see, the World Trade Center counted for how many? The Pentagon how many, the third 'plane how many? and, of course all the plots that didn't work---Seattle...

KS

9/11 was a lucky strike against our complacency and feelings of superiority so spectacular it gave these people a greater stature than they deserve.
What have they done since to warrant Homeland Security spending on the military like we do.
Bin Laden is the subconscious patron saint of the military and law enforcement state who thank him for providing the excuse for expanding their secret powers, something they have always wanted.
The terrorists since 9/11 have killed maybe 25 people in the US in 10 years.
Even if they had managed to kill more the threat to the general public is still miniscule.
3000 people die every day from various natural and un natural causes in the US, close to half just from smoking cigarettes.
 
To quote another part of said flyer, "Some of the activities, taken individually, could be innocent and must be examined by law enforcement professionals in a larger context to determine whether there is a basis to investigate."

In other words: If I pay cash for my coffee and internet, go to a fanatical site (lvc?:D), and then swap sim cards on my cell phone, I am a suspect. lol
 
To quote another part of said flyer, "Some of the activities, taken individually, could be innocent and must be examined by law enforcement professionals in a larger context to determine whether there is a basis to investigate."

In other words: If I pay cash for my coffee and internet, go to a fanatical site (lvc?:D), and then swap sim cards on my cell phone, I am a suspect. lol

Your Papers Please :D
 

Members online

No members online now.
Back
Top