http://www.time.com/time/election2004/article/0,18471,733715,00.html

No you got the wrong poll Kerry leads by 3.

Newsweek (880 LV) (http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/6312421/site/newsweek/)
10/21 - 10/22
48%
46%
2%
Bush +2
ABC/Wash Post (1248 LV) (http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-srv/politics/elections/2004/charting.html)* (http://www.realclearpolitics.com/bush_vs_kerry.html#wp)
10/20 - 10/22
50%
46%
1%
Bush +4
Zogby (1212 LV) (http://www.reuters.com/newsArticle.jhtml;jsessionid=J4MJK2K5RKQ2SCRBAELCF FA?type=topNews&storyID=6588201)
10/20 - 10/22
47%
45%
1%
Bush +2
TIPP (792 LV) (http://www.tipponline.com/)
10/19- 10/22
48%
44%
2%
Bush +4
Time (803 LV) (http://www.time.com/time/election2004/article/0,18471,733715,00.html)
10/19 - 10/21
51%
46%
2%
Bush +5
AP-Ipsos (976 LV) (http://asia.news.yahoo.com/041021/ap/d85rubj80.html)
10/18 - 10/20
46%
49%
2%
Kerry +3
Marist (772 LV w/leaners) (http://www.realclearpolitics.com/Polls/marist-10-21.pdf)
10/17 - 10/19
49%
48%
1%
Bush +1
FOX News (1000 LV) (http://www.foxnews.com/projects/pdf/101904_poll.pdf)
10/17 - 10/18
49%
42%
2%
Bush +7
(http://www.realclearpolitics.com/Presidential_04/RCP_EC.html)
RCP Electoral Count: Bush 234 - Kerry 211 (http://www.realclearpolitics.com/Presidential_04/RCP_EC.html)

http://www.realclearpolitics.com/images/rcp%20electoral/RCP-10-22-REV1.gif

mespock, i did not get the wrong poll, i saw this story and posted it. It looks like Kerry 's lead might be slipping. After the DNC Kerry got a boost in the polls then lost it the same is happening now. :cool:

Wait for Monday when the State Polls are released. I hear there is big movement.

Some are speculating that the internals are looking very bad for Kerry at this point.

Also, the Washington Times is printing a page 1 article that questions Kerry's foreign policy and some of his positions. The speculation is creating quite a stir on the net right now but from what I have heard, is not an elecion altering type thing but is yet another paper cut for Kerry when it comes to the undecideds. A death by a thousand cuts is the way it sounds. The tone over at DemocraticUnderground is very worried about this article.

Bryan, how many of the battle ground states have a winner take all policy.

Bryan, how many of the battle ground states have a winner take all policy.I may be wrong, but I thought every state was like that. I think Colorado may change, but they're the only one that's considering it I believe.

Bryan, how many of the battle ground states have a winner take all policy.All of the states have a winner take all policy. New Hampshire may have something funky going on and may be the exception. And like Kbob said, Colorado is voting on it although I don't think legally it can have any effect on this election.

If Bush wins the popular and Kerry wins the electoral, we'll probably never hear about splitting votes again. http://www.lincolnvscadillac.com//images/icons/icon12.gif

http://www.realclearpolitics.com/news_images-on_site/3waybig.jpg

This morning my local paper stated that all states have a "winner-take-all" system for their electoral votes except Maine and Nebraska. Those two allow for a division of electoral votes if constituents in a congressional district differ from the statewide vote. However, this has never occurred.

Interesting to hear and thanks for setting the record straight.

Interesting to hear and thanks for setting the record straight.

Don't miss the packer game. Bear's are really smelling up the North Central again.