Lincoln vs Cadillac Forums Do it yourself car repair

Thank you for visiting Lincoln vs Cadillac Forums

You have reached our archive. Click Here to visit our main website.


Supercharger or 2x turbo for LS. Would a local shop be able to do it?

b34nz
May 28th, 2006, 08:37 PM
I am very impatient and want the super charger ASAP.

I hear that supercharging the LS is very hard. What if I took it to a performance shop in my local area, you think they would be able to pull this off? I would even accept twin turbo if I couldnt get the super charger.

Thanks.

lexmarkz00
May 29th, 2006, 07:30 AM
Only one way to find out... call them up and ask.

rocket5979
May 29th, 2006, 09:43 AM
I am very impatient and want the super charger ASAP.

I hear that supercharging the LS is very hard. What if I took it to a performance shop in my local area, you think they would be able to pull this off? I would even accept twin turbo if I couldnt get the super charger.

Thanks.


Any good shop worth their salt can do it, but the problem is that there aren't as many good shops as some would imagine. A lot of racing or performance shops bill themselves at that while only being parts retailers and nothing else.

The best bet would be to turbocharge the LS anyways. The reason being not neccessarily in the ease of one versus the other (they both have their equally difficult challenges) but rather that per pound of boost the turbo makes more power being that is isn't powered by the engine crank. That is not soo critical in other cars that can run 9+ psi on the stock bottom end of their engines. Being that our cars have 10.55:1 & 10.75:1 compression we don't have much room to boost before hitting the absolute wall of safety. Only about 6- psi is what I would be somewhat comfortable throwing at these engines due to their really high stock compression.

I know some may not agree with this, but in these cars the best bet is to really just go with a properly tuned setup of wet nitrous. Nitrous loves high compression engines and your only limit is the stock fuel system (if left without upgrades) and your internals actual power limit; versus the limit at which detonation will occur with the F/I stuff. Hope I didn't bombard you with too much info. :D

StinkinLinkinLS01
May 29th, 2006, 01:38 PM
:q:q:q:q I was going to purchase a used (came off of an LS) complete custom fit N.O.S. kit with a purge kit, bottle heater, switches, and a/f gauge for $500 even. I backed out because I was having problems with my second vehicle and didnt want to depend on the LS for my daily driver will trying to run it with spray on the weekends.

The whole kit ended up selling at $375 on ebay. Someone got one hellofa deal because that is about $550 for the kit, $150 bottle heater, $200 purge kit, and who knows about the a/f gauge and the labor to custom fit all the lines and what not. I think I shoulda went with that and just ran a 50 shot or something.

b34nz
May 29th, 2006, 03:11 PM
I would never get NOS. It's kind of like wearing a fake gold necklace IMO.
I want real, all time power. Something I can use everyday in normal driving conditions.

rocket5979
May 29th, 2006, 03:23 PM
I would never get NOS. It's kind of like wearing a fake gold necklace IMO.
I want real, all time power. Something I can use everyday in normal driving conditions.



Some people like it just for that reason; that it can be turned off. Bottom line is that nitrous is safer to use on these cars than F/I is. That is unless you plan to run race gas all the time to prevent the chance of detonation. :D

decibels5
May 29th, 2006, 05:31 PM
Where Are You Located In Florida? There Is A Good Shop In Jax. Stage Six Is The Name. Everyone I Know That Has Had Major Turbo Or Supercharger Work Has Some Point Gone To Them. This Is Usually Where You Find The Fastest Rice Burners And High End Cars.

b34nz
May 29th, 2006, 05:48 PM
Where Are You Located In Florida? There Is A Good Shop In Jax. Stage Six Is The Name. Everyone I Know That Has Had Major Turbo Or Supercharger Work Has Some Point Gone To Them. This Is Usually Where You Find The Fastest Rice Burners And High End Cars.

I'm in south west Florida.

I actually just went down to a performance shop around the corner and they said they can turbo or SC the LS for me. They said even if I didnt go that route, if they Hooked up the computer to my car, they could probably get me close to 15%+ more power just by removing all the factory restrictions. These guys work on lots of porsche, supra, mustangs, etc, They have a really good rep around town.

rocket5979
May 29th, 2006, 07:19 PM
I'm in south west Florida.

I actually just went down to a performance shop around the corner and they said they can turbo or SC the LS for me. They said even if I didnt go that route, if they Hooked up the computer to my car, they could probably get me close to 15%+ more power just by removing all the factory restrictions. These guys work on lots of porsche, supra, mustangs, etc, They have a really good rep around town.


I dont mean to be the bearer of bad news but they aren't going to get 15% more horsepower out of your car by just modifying your PCM settings. On a 252 hp engine that would be a gain of almost 40 horsepower with just a tune. Expect roughly 20 additional horsepower with a more aggressive tune.

b34nz
May 29th, 2006, 09:48 PM
I dont mean to be the bearer of bad news but they aren't going to get 15% more horsepower out of your car by just modifying your PCM settings. On a 252 hp engine that would be a gain of almost 40 horsepower with just a tune. Expect roughly 20 additional horsepower with a more aggressive tune.


Maybe the guy ment 15-20 HP
He was in a hurry, just talked real fast and he took my info, they were closing the shop up when I walked in.

2001LS8Sport
May 30th, 2006, 08:43 AM
A turbo is much more difficult to plumb than a s/c. You not only have to run the intake side, but the exhaust too. I really don't know if you could find the room on one of these cars for that without having to locate the turbo(s) in the exhaust at the back of the car. (although I'm hearing some pretty good results out of that system) But Rocket is correct...you get more hp to the wheels per pound of boost due to no parasitic drag with the turbo. Cool idea...I would love to see you take that on!!

rocket5979
May 30th, 2006, 09:59 AM
A turbo is much more difficult to plumb than a s/c. You not only have to run the intake side, but the exhaust too. I really don't know if you could find the room on one of these cars for that without having to locate the turbo(s) in the exhaust at the back of the car. (although I'm hearing some pretty good results out of that system) But Rocket is correct...you get more hp to the wheels per pound of boost due to no parasitic drag with the turbo. Cool idea...I would love to see you take that on!!



Yes and no. A turbo is more difficult to plumb but a supercharger is more difficult to find a place to mount and then line the head unit pulley up with the front drive accessory pullies(recessed under cam gear ledge in heads). The only real feasible way to supercharge an LS is to go with a roots or other top of the intake manifold supercharger. I had a centrifugal supercharger from an old project left over and was planning to try to fab that in the LS once I bought it. Once I got the LS and took a closer look and made a few measurements I found that it was all but impossible to fab a centri in there without losing some other accessories in the process. I am all for really custom supercharger work and all, but I didn't feel like messing with that can of worms when there were two better options.

For these cars if you have to do F/I then turbo is by far the way to go for more than a few reasons. As long as the turbo is correctly sized and mapped to the engine it is going on then even in a remote mounted location they will function pretty well. You will have to put up with a tiny bit more lag time, but nothing major as long as the turbo is picked carefully.

b34nz
May 30th, 2006, 11:59 AM
If they choose a SC or turbo, what am I looking at for a ballpark price? Any ideas? $5,000? More? Less?

rocket5979
May 30th, 2006, 12:54 PM
If they choose a SC or turbo, what am I looking at for a ballpark price? Any ideas? $5,000? More? Less?


For everything said and done, with a tune your talking more like $7,000-$8,000 or so at least for a custom turbo kit with all the workings included.

b34nz
May 30th, 2006, 01:50 PM
For everything said and done, with a tune your talking more like $7,000-$8,000 or so at least for a custom turbo kit with all the workings included.

YIKES.
I better start saving up lol

After all the stuff I just bought for my LS, I only have 1500 or so left in the bank. Oh well, I REALLY want a SC or turbo, so I will just have to save my ass off.

I cant wait

daves2000ls
May 30th, 2006, 02:15 PM
is your car a v8 or v6?

Beamer
May 30th, 2006, 02:24 PM
I thought of going the route of the turbo going back by the exhaust, did a little research and watched a show on it being done and if you go to the right place and get the right kit you won't have any lag like some might think. Only thing stopping me is I would rather spend my money on something useful like a house or something than take the life of my LS and make it possibly half by adding more power. I am sure the engine can take a great deal, but I would rather just settle for basic add-ons.

Good luck though if you do have something done and of course be sure to let us know how it is.

b34nz
May 30th, 2006, 04:39 PM
is your car a v8 or v6?

V8

rocket5979
May 30th, 2006, 07:29 PM
and get the right kit you won't have any lag like some might think.



While lag can be minimized, it can never truly be fully overcame. That is why it is a lot harder feathering the throttle on a turbo race car because of the lag and then the free spool on the other end. When sized right lag will be minimal enough so as not to be an issue. :cool:

2001LS8Sport
May 31st, 2006, 08:42 AM
While lag can be minimized, it can never truly be fully overcame. That is why it is a lot harder feathering the throttle on a turbo race car because of the lag and then the free spool on the other end. When sized right lag will be minimal enough so as not to be an issue. :cool:

That is also one big reason many racers running turbos equip their cars with a small shot of juice. It doesn't take much NOS to spool up that turbo in a hurry. They only hit it long enough to get the turbos spooled up. Then it's hold on to your ass!!!

rocket5979
June 1st, 2006, 01:12 PM
That is also one big reason many racers running turbos equip their cars with a small shot of juice. It doesn't take much NOS to spool up that turbo in a hurry. They only hit it long enough to get the turbos spooled up. Then it's hold on to your ass!!!



I am not referring to lag just on the accelleration end. I am talking about all around lag. Tossing the juice on a laggy system will get the car off the line quick enough without the turbo making full boost and also get it spooled pretty good by that time too. What I am talking about is that but ALSO the lag time you got when trying to feather the throttle when the tires lose traction. After all, I don't think ya wanna hit the juice when your trying to regain traction. :D :D :D

b34nz
June 1st, 2006, 03:01 PM
guy's, just FYI, I'm not looking to make my car a "race car" or a drag car. I just want it to be fast incase I need it. 75% of the time I will be driving normal. But when kids pull up next to me in those stupid ass honda's and whatnot, reving the engine, I'd like to be able to make them feel like total :q:q:q:q:q:q:qs. Ya know what I'm saying?

beaups
June 1st, 2006, 03:16 PM
then n02 would be perfect

b34nz
June 1st, 2006, 05:48 PM
then n02 would be perfect

I feel like nos is cheating. I want true HP ya know.
If I cant get turbo or SC then I will just do everything else I can besides that and I will have to deal with it.

I have magnaflow exhaust and the full intake kit on the way. I will get that installed and the computer reprogramed. I hope that would give me atleast 25 more HP.

After that, I'm not sure whatelse I could do? Any ideas? Headers or something?

StinkinLinkinLS01
June 1st, 2006, 05:56 PM
I have exhaust (custom 40 series flowmasters), intake, modded cold air tube from lower grill, and the XCal2 and when running at max tune I'd be surprised if I made more than 280HP. That is a 30+ overall HP gain from my stock 252 on the gen1 LS. If you don't SC or some other form of forced induction it doesn't get too much faster. That is just my opinion, I'm not an expert by any means though...

My next mod is 3.58 gears. If I was going to go any further I'd get nos. A 50-75 wet shot with all necessary safety accessories used with care and common sense would be fine...

From what I understand things like headers, throttle boddies, intake manifolds, and other things similar are too difficult and costly. First off you don't have much room and second you would need all the parts custom machined (to my knowledge)...

Also, if you only need/want the power 25% of the time nos makes WAY more sense than a SC or turbo....

b34nz
June 1st, 2006, 06:21 PM
I have exhaust (custom 40 series flowmasters), intake, modded cold air tube from lower grill, and the XCal2 and when running at max tune I'd be surprised if I made more than 280HP. That is a 30+ overall HP gain from my stock 252 on the gen1 LS. If you don't SC or some other form of forced induction it doesn't get too much faster. That is just my opinion, I'm not an expert by any means though...

My next mod is 3.58 gears. If I was going to go any further I'd get nos. A 50-75 wet shot with all necessary safety accessories used with care and common sense would be fine...

From what I understand things like headers, throttle boddies, intake manifolds, and other things similar are too difficult and costly. First off you don't have much room and second you would need all the parts custom machined (to my knowledge)...

Also, if you only need/want the power 25% of the time nos makes WAY more sense than a SC or turbo....

I really want to get a S/C =[
But after thinking about it, I dont think I'd spend more than $6,000 to have a S/C bought, installed, and tuned. It's just too much money.

StinkinLinkinLS01
June 1st, 2006, 08:41 PM
So spend like $500 and get that nos kit used and add 50-100 hp...

rocket5979
June 2nd, 2006, 05:00 PM
Whether you feel like it is cheating or not, nitrous is the best bet for you in this case. Besides you actually saying you want nitrous, the rest of your preferences point right towards it.

I don't view nitrous as cheating at all. It is just one other way of adding more air to the mixture to make more power. No it is not on all the time like a turbo or a supercharger would be but that is the beauty of it. If you want to go back to a relatively mildly modded car then you can do so with the flip of a few switches.

I like it because when it is off I can run a low low 14 and with it on I will run a high 12. It is horsepower on damand and only when I want it. And of course in the shirt run NO2 is one heck of a lot cheaper than a turbo or supercharger. just pointing out some other facts man. It is your choice and yours alone. We have armed you with the knowledge, now go out and do whats you feel is best for your situation.

crab daddy
June 2nd, 2006, 05:34 PM
Whether you feel like it is cheating or not, nitrous is the best bet for you in this case. Besides you actually saying you want nitrous, the rest of your preferences point right towards it.

I don't view nitrous as cheating at all. It is just one other way of adding more air to the mixture to make more power. No it is not on all the time like a turbo or a supercharger would be but that is the beauty of it. If you want to go back to a relatively mildly modded car then you can do so with the flip of a few switches.

I like it because when it is off I can run a low low 14 and with it on I will run a high 12. It is horsepower on damand and only when I want it. And of course in the shirt run NO2 is one heck of a lot cheaper than a turbo or supercharger. just pointing out some other facts man. It is your choice and yours alone. We have armed you with the knowledge, now go out and do whats you feel is best for your situation.

I agree, I don't see nitrous as anything other than another power adder. People don't realise the tuning that needs to go into nitrous also, which is one of the reasons it gets a bad rep for blowing motors. A little word of advice, run copper plugs when using nitrous.

You will need an awfully big shot to take 1.5 - 2.0 seconds off of your 1/4 mile.

rocket5979
June 2nd, 2006, 10:26 PM
I agree, I don't see nitrous as anything other than another power adder. People don't realise the tuning that needs to go into nitrous also, which is one of the reasons it gets a bad rep for blowing motors. A little word of advice, run copper plugs when using nitrous.

You will need an awfully big shot to take 1.5 - 2.0 seconds off of your 1/4 mile.


Nitrous got a bad rep because people did exactly that back in the 70's. They put it on their cars and didn't expect to have to tune for it. Big booms later and now that whole generation has been mostly spoiled with people badmouthing nitrous. Now THAT generation is in the positions such as Ford tech advisors and the local mechanics positions and tell other less understanding people the bad things nitrous will do to engines. Tune for it and run the right stuff and you will be fine.

BTW, on the copper plugs comment I will say this. Dont ever mistake changing plugs in an LS for fun. I went with 2 heat range cooler copper plugs in my LS and it was a PITA to access the rear bolts on the COP covers.

I will only need to be taking 1.2 seconds off my 1/4 ET to hit 12's. My current N/A setup has at least a 14.2 and maybe a 14.1 in it on a good day. Then from there it is just a little over a second away to hit 12's. While that is obviously no small margin, a progressive controlled 100 wetshot will get the job done, and with decent traction too.


Classic Mopar Forum - Mopar - Speed Trap

EZ Archive Ads Plugin for vBulletin Copyright 2006 Computer Help Forum