According to Vitas, it was purely rumor that the terrorists were from Saudi Arabia. He implied that they were from Iraq.

Now, the 9/11 Commission has stated that the majority of the terrorists were from Saudi Arabia, but I can't get an answer out of him as to why he thinks they were from Iraq.

Answers please in this new thread, since fossten has clamored for a new, less clogged thread.

All I ask is for an answer from Vitas as to why the 9/11 Commission was wrong.

Instead he refuses to give an answer, dodging the question.

All I ask is for an answer from Vitas as to why the 9/11 Commission was wrong.

Instead he refuses to give an answer, dodging the question.

Start with this:

Do you have dental records?

According to Vitas,.... He implied that they were from Iraq..

No, I did not.

No, I did not.

Issue resolved then.

I guess the question is, why did Cap't A misrepresent Vitas then?

Issue resolved then.

I guess the question is, why did Cap't A misrepresent Vitas then?

I did not, go read the extremely long thread with 80+ posts.

Start with this:

Do you have dental records?

I don't personally have the records, but the US government, according to the report, IDed the remains using ante-mortem genetic testing and dental records.

I don't personally have the records, but the US government, according to the report, IDed the remains using ante-mortem genetic testing and dental records.

He's knows he is wrong otherwise he would answer the two simple questions.

1) Are terrorist considered WMD's
2) Was the 9/11 commission report wrong in ID'ing the terrorist.

His tactic was simple, twist and turn until the post went into the dumper, now that you made a new thread, he still wont give a straight answer and is doing the same. He's taking the coward's way out, oh well.

By the way Calabrio, he did say that terrorist where as deadly or more so than a WMD and that the it was Iraqi terrorist that attacked on 9/11. Go back and read the thread for yourself if you don't believe me.

He's knows he is wrong otherwise he would answer the two simple questions.

I looked at this a bit tonight, and it is laughable how full of it you both are.

He, or she, at least, had the brains to fold. Do you seriously want to bring his argument forth? Both of you have posted massive fiction,

do you want to defend his, and your, fiction? Is that why you drive a Cadillac?

I don't personally have the records, but the US government, according to the report, IDed the remains using ante-mortem genetic testing and dental records.

Not true. Fiction.

I looked at this a bit tonight, and it is laughable how full of it you both are.

He, or she, at least, had the brains to fold. Do you seriously want to bring his argument forth? Both of you have posted massive fiction,

do you want to defend his, and your, fiction? Is that why you drive a Cadillac?

What's laughable is how you still won't answer and explain the two simple questions. STILL.

If he (she) quit, it was due to boredom and the realization that you just won't answer because you know you are wrong. You called him a rookie etc etc. Yet you never proved or showed facts how you were right because you never answered.

Here's your fiction... And what does me driving a Cadillac have to do with anything about Terrorist being the equivalent of WMD's and the 9/11 report?

The fiction as you call in: (all can be found in this thread started by Fossten 'Lefties, your last chance to learn something about Conservatism:)


You would think that we were all living in the same country...

Dissent is fine, it makes our country so much better for it, but when you see comments that obviously beg for OUR downfall in these fragile times you need to examine what their agenda is. And, clearly, they have an agenda.

Bush is doing a stellar job in handling the Economy under the extremely adverse circumstances that were given to him. The Iraq war was won long ago, now we have to deal with allowing the Iraqi people the ability to make the transition to governing and protecting themselves. In the meantime we are finding massive amounts of WMD, in terrorists and insurgents. When done, this will be the biggest and most important Revolution in our generation. Dealing with the hate of Islam extremists at the core.

What attacked New York on 9/11/01?

See, you have learned something new today. Terrorists are the equivalent of weapons of mass destruction. BTW they "said" they were Saudi's. Would you expect criminals to identify themselves?

I have not heard that rumor. Please provide a credible link. In the meantime, terrorists are as bad as, or worse than WMD. Figure that out for yourself.

Who attacked NY on 9/11/01?

So, are you going to answer the two simple questions:

1) Do terrorist now equal WMD's? (Show facts/proof)

2) Was the 9/11 commission report wrong in ID'ing the terrorist nationalities?

Or just call people 'rookies' at debating while dodging around? I see why Raveneyes ignores you, you twist and dodge like no other.

What's laughable is how you still won't answer and explain the two simple questions. STILL.

As I said, first things first.

You have the "transcript" above. Where did I say what you both misrepresented below, and why did you misrepresent me? You have no facts, so you invent them?

So when we IDed them as Saudis, they weren't Saudis but Iraqis, even though the 9/11 Commission IDed them as Saudis? And you have better intel I presume?

According to Vitas, it was purely rumor that the terrorists were from Saudi Arabia. He implied that they were from Iraq.

No, I did not.

Issue resolved then.

I guess the question is, why did Cap't A misrepresent Vitas then?

I did not, go read the extremely long thread with 80+ posts.

By the way Calabrio, he did say that …. and that the it was Iraqi terrorist that attacked on 9/11. Go back and read the thread for yourself if you don't believe me.
http://www.geocities.com/vitas00/LINCOLNS/a.gif http://www.geocities.com/vitas00/LINCOLNS/a.gif http://www.geocities.com/vitas00/LINCOLNS/a.gif http://www.geocities.com/vitas00/LINCOLNS/a.gif

You have both been caught intentionally misrepresenting me redhanded.

We will have more fun later.

http://www.geocities.com/vitas00/LINCOLNS/a.gif

You still have yet to answer the questions. Enough of your dodging, either ANSWER the questions or SAY YOU WON'T. It’s that simple.

I clearly stated that if anyone wanted to see how it all originally went down, before you twisted, turned it and dodged, they could go see the original thread started by Fossten titled 'Lefties, your last chance to learn something about Conservatism' for themselves. Since you are most likely going to question if I did such action's, here is the quote, see below 9It can be found on this same thread) If I were trying to misrepresent you, why would I do that?


The fiction as you call in: (all can be found in this thread started by Fossten 'Lefties, your last chance to learn something about Conservatism:)

Deville, we should stop wasting our time arguing with those who demonstrate fractional competence to arrogance ratios. You know he was wrong. WE know he was wrong. Will he ever admit it?? Don't hold your breath, why do you think he's being so evasive? Just like the administration in charge, make up something that sounds good and fools the people into thinking the way you want them to think. Basing statements in fact is irrelevant to most shrubbies.

You still have yet to answer the questions. Enough of your dodging, either ANSWER the questions or SAY YOU WON'T. It’s that simple.

I clearly stated that if anyone wanted to see how it all originally went down, before you twisted, turned it and dodged, they could go see the original thread started by Fossten titled 'Lefties, your last chance to learn something about Conservatism' for themselves.

You keep insisting, over, and over, and over again, that I said something that I did not say.

By the way Calabrio, he did say that …. and that the it was Iraqi terrorist that attacked on 9/11. Go back and read the thread for yourself if you don't believe me.
PROVE IT, or retract your misrepresentation. Then I can address the rest of the issues.

Here is page 2 of the thread:

http://www.lincolnvscadillac.com/showthread.php?t=14073&page=2

Here is page 3:

http://www.lincolnvscadillac.com/showthread.php?t=14073&page=3


Since you are most likely going to question if I did such action's, here is the quote, see below 9It can be found on this same thread) If I were trying to misrepresent you, why would I do that?

What are you referring to? Your statement makes no sense.

"Answer the question Claire....."

John Bender circa 1985

"Answer the question Claire....."

John Bender circa 1985


"NO!! I never did it!"

"I never did it either. I'm not a nymphomaniac; I'm a compulsive liar."

LOL I LOVE that movie!:headbang:

"Answer the question Claire....."

John Bender circa 1985

"I'm a compulsive liar." Excellent choice, cad.http://www.geocities.com/vitas00/LINCOLNS/a.gif

Describes the leftocrat affliction fairly well. Although pathological liar may be more appropriate.

Vitas = Question Dodger.

Vitas = Question Dodger.

Now pay close attention, pOOpie.

Initial post starting this thread:


Now, the 9/11 Commission has stated that the majority of the terrorists were from Saudi Arabia, but I can't get an answer out of him as to why he thinks they were from Iraq.

My reply:

No, I did not.

That was a week ago.

Take a remedial reading course, or sumthing.

Poopie........That's the best you can do Dodger? No worries, the original thread has it all laid out in plain text for all to see.

Lets just let this thread die. Can we at least agree on that?

No worries, the original thread has it all laid out in plain text for all to see.

Yes it does. And it is clear as day that I never said, implied, or otherwise suggested that the 9/11 terrorists were from Iraq. You have clearly demonstrated beyond a shadow of a doubt how you leftocrats have hallucinative imaginations AND how you intentionally misrepresent facts as a matter of course.

Yes it does. And it is clear as day that I never said, implied, or otherwise suggested that the 9/11 terrorists were from Iraq. You have clearly demonstrated beyond a shadow of a doubt how you leftocrats have hallucinative imaginations AND how you intentionally misrepresent facts as a matter of course.

Lol.. I said (more than once) the original thread is there and people can read for themselves and make up their own minds. If letting people make up their own assumptions is "Leftocrate Fact Twisting', then I don't know what else to say besides take your own advice to me and get into a remedial reading course.

Can we let this die now?

You guys should just pm each other. Or, better yet, trade addresses and get a room and end this sexual tension.

Anybody else who bothers to read this thread is just laughing at both of you.

Anybody else who bothers to read this thread is just laughing at both of you.
Yeah, I had a good laugh myself:

As I said, first things first.

Go back and read the thread for yourself if you don't believe me.
http://www.geocities.com/vitas00/LINCOLNS/a.gif http://www.geocities.com/vitas00/LINCOLNS/a.gif http://www.geocities.com/vitas00/LINCOLNS/a.gif http://www.geocities.com/vitas00/LINCOLNS/a.gif

You have both been caught intentionally misrepresenting me redhanded.

We will have more fun later.

I also promised:

PROVE IT, or retract your misrepresentation. Then I can address the rest of the issues.

Here is page 2 of the thread:

http://www.lincolnvscadillac.com/showthread.php?t=14073&page=2

Here is page 3:

http://www.lincolnvscadillac.com/showthread.php?t=14073&page=3


WDIK

You guys should just pm each other. Or, better yet, trade addresses and get a room and end this sexual tension.

Anybody else who bothers to read this thread is just laughing at both of you.

Sorry to spoil your fantasies, but I am not a homosexual.

You're right on that account, that's why for the third time now I have said, let’s just end this thread and let the original thread stand for anyone to make up their own minds. Vitas, can we agree on this?