MarkOfDeath
July 12th, 2004, 04:14 PM
I went around town looking for the best price and a shop to do 2.5 inch pipes, I was quoted around 350 for cat back 2.25 duals, then I my friend took me to a place where he got his, they charged me 120 for 2.25 duals, I wanted and told them 2.5 but I wanted flanges, in spots were he said would be to tight to do 2.5 so I just went with 2.25 all the way back, right now Im going back next week for and x pipe and magnaflow mufflers, because as of now I dont have mufflers, third cat, or resonator. and it is hella loud. it sounds good at idle and cruising, but when it go past 1700 rpm it sounds like a harley :pat:
MonsterMark
July 12th, 2004, 06:00 PM
Isn't that a ssa sdrawkcab install? LOL.
JoshMcMadMac
July 13th, 2004, 07:33 AM
Cool!
MarkOfDeath
July 13th, 2004, 01:28 PM
:ttiwwp:
http://memimage.cardomain.com/member_images/4/web/376000-376999/376171_202_full.jpg
http://memimage.cardomain.com/member_images/4/web/376000-376999/376171_203_full.jpg
sergmark
July 13th, 2004, 01:36 PM
Thats cool Brad. Hope you get the sound you want. I forget whose pipes I heard but when It backs off it should be smooth no popping. i hope the Magnaflows do that. :invasion:
StraDog
July 13th, 2004, 03:20 PM
Why not 2.5" !! Spend that damn money and get some actual performance out of it ! LOL JK. Nice to see you finally working on the exhaust.
Sifrino3
July 18th, 2004, 12:18 AM
:iagree: Why not 2.5" !! Spend that damn money and get some actual performance out of it ! LOL JK. Nice to see you finally working on the exhaust.
Topcat
July 18th, 2004, 10:18 AM
If you ask in your local muffler shops I think you will find 2.25 " is as high as there bending charts goto making the install a no brainer...2.5" they can do but have to work at it . The bends make the lengths different , and its possible to kink the pipe using their equipment set up for 2.25" thus the difference in price...I don't think you will see any noticeable difference in performance between the pipe sizes....I once had a hotrod truck with 2 , 5" pipes to the rear and out the back , the size was attention getting , and had no beneficial purpose... :steering:
JoshMcMadMac
July 18th, 2004, 01:33 PM
...the size was attention getting , and had no beneficial purpose... :steering:
That contradicts itself! ;)
Topcat
July 18th, 2004, 02:59 PM
That contradicts itself! ;)
Your right Josh , but I guess its where your values are ,,
No performance gains ............. ok :biggrin:
JoshMcMadMac
July 19th, 2004, 07:23 AM
Your right Josh , but I guess its where your values are ,,
No performance gains ............. ok :biggrin:
Yea, that's a better way of putting it. :yourock:
