Lincoln vs Cadillac Forums

(This is the forums archive - If you want to get back to the main site simply click the banner above and you will be taken to our homepage.)

Lincoln vs Cadillac Forums is the Ultimate Online Resource for Owners and Enthusiasts of American Luxury Cars. Feel free to browse through our archive - but make sure you make it back to our main site - Lincoln vs Cadillac Forums

Cadillac XLR : Cadillac CTS : Cadillac : 2005 Cadillac STS : Cadillac Forums : 2000 Lincoln LS : Lincoln Mark VIII : Lincoln Mark VII : Car Wax
Lincoln Town Car : Lincoln Air Suspension : Lincoln Continental : Lemon Law : Do It Yourself Car Repair : Lincoln vs Cadillac Forums : Mesothelioma

Back to the Archive Main Page

Pages: 1

Got Rubber ?

(Click here to view the original thread with full colors/images)

Posted by: StraDog

Just a few shots of the Mark burning em up a bit at a local GmvsFord meet.

Posted by: hotrodlincoln93

nisee.....

GM hahah.... nice hood by the way lol , me and you have the very rare and wanted mark viii cobra hood.

Posted by: Lincolnpimpin

Nice, this weekend is a burnout countest I'm gona try to enter.

Posted by: BlackMark8Li

Quote:

Originally Posted by hotrodlincoln93

nisee.....

GM hahah.... nice hood by the way lol , me and you have the very rare and wanted mark viii cobra hood.

sorry but gm is way better than ford. I love my mark and like the power but for a mustang or any ford to hang with a gm.. they need to have boost, one way or another ford does not have the power gm has.

Posted by: ONEBADMK8

Nice!! ! Videos! Videos! Videos!!! We neeeeeeed MMOORRREEE Burnout VIDEOS!!!

Posted by: StraDog

BADA$$, Geno ! I will not be posting any videos of burnout until the damn 4.10's get in there !!

I need to free up that rearend and get the damn posi unit in there ASAP. But there is a list of things to be done before. SOON !

I think you should have a group buy for a complete diff with posi and 4.10's, along with the Denny's driveshafts and sell em for a reasonable price ! LOL. Might not be a bad idea, but maybe a lot of work and time in which you already have none of...

Posted by: BlackIceLSC

Blackice's one legger smoke show VIDEO! (sorry, it's all I have stored right now)
it's funny, I can leave all the dual patches you see, but not when being filmed!

http://www.markviii.org/~firenice/MOV00003.MPG

Posted by: mespock

Wow Stradog made a meet LOL

No rain! LOL

Nice!

Posted by: JoeyLincolnMK8

awesome pics & vids. i also hate them 1 legger burn-outs. can not wait to install a posi unit on my car.

Posted by: bufordtpisser

Quote:

Originally Posted by BlackMark8Li

Yeah, that is what i think every morning when I smoke all of those so called high performance GM's on my way to work. Corvett's, Impala's, Malibu's. No matter what you have, someone always has something faster. But when I am in the Mark, they may be faster, but they are always outclassed. I love it when I am in a parking lot or at the car wash and all of the GM owners go out of their way to come over and comment on just how classy my Mark is.

Posted by: driller

I don't get much smoke from my Nittos and posi.

Posted by: BlackMark8Li

Quote:

Originally Posted by bufordtpisser

yea impala's arn't that fast and neither are older vettes.. I was talking mainly about newer gm's.. late 90s trans ams and vettes and ss camaros that stock run mid 13's and a lil work w/o boost can be in the 12's.. you'll never see a mark be in the 12's w/o boost unless you strip the whole car down to a seat, a engine, and a steering wheel.

Posted by: Lincolns Own

ok, this might sound dumb... but how do u do a burnout? (im 16 and my parents wanna keep me away from the fast stuff but im coming out of my shell. teach me!

)

Posted by: K*A*B

Quote:

Originally Posted by BlackMark8Li

you don't know a whole lot about racing do you , you are really comparing a 4200 pound 4.6 to a 3500 pound 5.7
i am not a ford fan and i do think the ls1's are great engines but you could have at least compared the lincoln to a caddy or impala of the same time frame and the vette and camaro to a mustang

Posted by: klutch

Ford engines are better look at the specs 4.6L @ 290HP while it takes chevy 5.7L to do 305HP? someone needs better engine design and efficiency and it aint ford

Posted by: bufordtpisser

Quote:

Originally Posted by K*A*B

You will almost never see a Chevy guy compare cars that are evenly matched. They always want to compare Vetts, Camaro's, and Trans Am's to Mark VIII's. But that is OK. Those of us who know how, do. Those of you who do not know how, brag about what you do not have. I will put my driving skillz up against most drivers out there. I have beaten many cars that should have spanked me only because my skillz are honed. They buy the hardware, but dont have the mental software to get the job done. Yes ladies, sometimes size does not matter.

Posted by: rmac694203

I thought Marks weighed like 3800 pounds, not 4200. Maybe I'm wrong though. Personally, I love my mark, but would love to have a Camaro or Trans Am as well. Plus, I would rather have a manual.

Posted by: K*A*B

i like ls1 cars also , tpi and lt1 cars are junk and i'll line up with any with similar work , anyday of the week
mine weighed a tick under 4200 with me in it , but i'm also not a small guy

ford vs chevy
deffinetly like chevy better since the release of the ls1 (except the 03-04 cobras and lightnings....boosted lol)
through the 80's and early 90's would be ford , the sbc is not even a close compro to a 5.0(but grand nationals and syclones were bad ass....boosted hmmm)
i've always been a mopar fan , but they have never had anything fast to compare with a ford or chevy ...lmao

Posted by: MarkOfDeath

how about comparing us ( the faster half) to the gtos thats fare, those goats are for gays

Posted by: NYC LS8

http://www.putfile.com/media.php?n=Tommy10

That was with the old, stock motor and AOD

Posted by: mespock

Quote:

Originally Posted by K*A*B

i like ls1 cars also , tpi and lt1 cars are junk and i'll line up with any with similar work , anyday of the week
mine weighed a tick under 4200 with me in it , but i'm also not a small guy

ford vs chevy
deffinetly like chevy better since the release of the ls1 (except the 03-04 cobras and lightnings....boosted lol)
through the 80's and early 90's would be ford , the sbc is not even a close compro to a 5.0(but grand nationals and syclones were bad ass....boosted hmmm)
i've always been a mopar fan , but they have never had anything fast to compare with a ford or chevy ...lmao

Here is some good reading on the topic! Fast Cars

Year Make Model Engine HP 1/4 mile (seconds) 1/4 mile speed (MPH)
Source
1968 Plymouth S/S Barracuda 426 Hemi V8 525 ** 10.5 130 MCR
1968 Dodge S/S Hemi Dart 426 Hemi V8 525 ** 10.5 129 MCR
1969 Chevrolet Corvette Stingray ZL1 427 V8 430 ** 10.6 132 MT
2003 Ferrari Enzo 6.0L V12 660 11.0 133.9 MT
2002 Mosler MT900 Photon LS6 350 V8 435 11.02 126.88MT
2004 Porsche Carrera GT 5.7L V10 605 11.1 133.4 MT
2005 Ford GT 5.4L V8 S/C 500 11.2 131.2 MT
2003 Saleen S7 427 V8 550 11.36 127 MT
2005 Mercedes-Benz SLR McLaren 5.4L V8 S/C 617 11.6 127.2 MT
1997 Ameritech McLaren F1 6.0L V12 627 11.6 125 MT
2002 Lamborghini Murcielago 6.2L V12 571 11.72 122.52 MT
1964 Ford Fairlane T-bolt 427 V8 425 ** 11.76 122.78 CC
2003 Dodge Viper SRT-10 8.3L V10 500 11.77 123.63 MT
2001 Lamborghini Diablo VT 6.0L V12 550 11.8 121.0 MT
1997 Shelby Cobra 427 S/C 427 V8 488 11.8 121.0 MT
2005 Mercedes-Benz CL65 AMG 6.0L V12 T/C 604 11.8 120.9 MT
2004 Porsche Turbo X50 3.6L H6 T/C 450 11.86 119.91 MT
2002 Porsche 911 GT2 3.6L H6 T/C 456 11.9 120.6 CD
2004 Mercedes-Benz SL600 5.5L V12 T/C 493 11.9 120 CD
2001 Porsche 911 Turbo 3.6L H6 T/C 415 11.9 115.6 MT
2004 Superformance Brock Coupe 402 V8 515 12.0 120 MT
2000 Lamborghini Diablo 6.0L V12 550 12.0 119.8 CD
1963 Dodge Ramcharger 426 V8 425 12.0 117 MCR
2004 Porsche 911 GT3 3.6L H6 380 12.07 116.04 MT
1997 Dodge Viper GTS 8.0L V10 450 12.07 115.2 MCR
1997 Ferrari F50 4.7L V12 513 12.1 124.5 CD
2000 Shelby Series1 4.0L V8 S/C 450 12.1 120 CD
2000 Dodge Viper ACR 8.0L V10 460 12.2 119.2 MT
1966 AC / Shelby Cobra 427 V8 425 12.2 118 CC
2000 Ferrari 360 Modena 3.6L V8 395 12.2 113.5 MT
2003 Ferrari 575M Maranello 5.7L V12 508 12.26 118.58 MT
2002 Chevrolet Corvette Z06 LS6 346 V8 405 12.29 116 CD
1997 Dodge Viper RT/10 8.0L V10 450 12.3 117.19 MT
2003 Mercedes-Benz CL55 AMG 5.4L V8 S/C 493 12.38 114.45 MT
2003 Mercedes-Benz E55 AMG 5.4L V8 S/C 469 12.39 116.21 MT
1998 Dodge Viper GTS-R 8.0L V10 460 12.5 118.5 MT
2000 Ferrari 550 Maranello 5.5L V12 485 12.5 116.9 CD
2004 Lamborghini Gallardo 5.0L V10 495 12.5 116.7 MT
2003 Mercedes-Benz SL55 AMG 5.4L V8 S/C 469 12.5 116.1 MT
2004 Ferrari Challenge Stradale 3.6L V8 425 12.53 114.14 MT
2001 Chevrolet Corvette Z06 LS6 346 V8 385 12.57 113.96 MT
2005 Chevrolet Corvette Z51 LS2 6.0L V8 400 12.6 113.2 MT
2005 Porsche 911 Carrera S 3.8L H6 355 12.6 111.1 MT
2003 Audi RS 6 4.2L V8 T/C 450 12.63 108.64 MT
2001 Shelby Cobra 289 FIA 5.0L V8 350 12.7 108.1 MT
1969 Chevrolet Camaro ZL1 427 V8 430 12.76 107 MCR
1990 Chevrolet Corvette ZR1 LT5 350 V8 375 12.8 113.8 MT
2003 Ford Mustang Cobra 4.6L V8 S/C 390 12.8 113.2 CD
2000 Ford Mustang Cobra R 5.4L V8 385 12.8 112.7 MT
1966 Chevrolet Corvette L72 427 V8 425 12.8 112 CD
2002 BMW Z8 5.0L V8 394 12.8 111.6 MT
2002 Ferrari 360 Spider 3.6L V8 395 12.8 110.8 MT
1993 Dodge Viper RT/10 8.0L V10 400 12.8 110 MT
2005 Mercedes-Benz SLK55 AMG 5.4L V8 355 12.8 109.2 MT
1999 Lotus Esprit 3.5L V8 T/C 350 12.85 110.96 MT
2002 Aston Martin Vanquish 6.0L V12 460 12.9 112.9 CD
2005 Bentley Continental GT 6.0L W12 T/C 552 12.9 109.7 MT
1969 Plymouth Road Runner 440 V8 6-pack 390 12.91 111.8 SS
1999 Chevrolet Corvette LS1 346 V8 350 12.98 108.85 MT
1997 Pontiac Firebird / Hurst LS1 346 V8 350 12.99 103.11 MCR
2003 Maserati Coupe Cambio 4.2L V8 385 13.0 110.4 MT
2003 Chevrolet Corvette convertible LS1 346 V8 350 13.0 109.6 MT
1969 Chevrolet Camaro SS L78 396 V8 375 13.0 108.6 SA
1970 Plymouth Cuda 440 V8 6-pack 390 13.0 105.74 MCR
2002 Mercedes-Benz SLK32 AMG 3.2L V6 S/C 349 13.0 105.2 CD
1964 Pontiac GTO *** 389 Tri-Power 348 13.1 115 CD
1995 Chevrolet Corvette ZR1 LT5 350 V8 405 13.1 112 MT
2005 Cadillac CTS-V LS1 346 V8 400 13.1 109.8 MT
2002 BMW M5 5.0L V8 400 13.1 109.4 MT
2001 BMW M Roadster 3.2L 6-cyl 315 13.1 107.6 MT
1970 Plymouth Cuda 426 Hemi V8 425 13.1 107.12 CC
1970 Dodge Challenger SE 426 Hemi V8 425 13.1 107.12 CC
1970 Chevrolet Chevelle SS LS6 454 V8 450 13.12 107.01 CC

That's enough I should have just posted the URL
here it is.
http://www.autofacts.ca/classics/fast.htm

Posted by: BlackMark8Li

Quote:

Originally Posted by MarkOfDeath

how about comparing us ( the faster half) to the gtos thats fare, those goats are for gays

yea but was that gto stock?how about the mark? I'm not saying ford makes slow cars.. but compared to newer gms ford hasn't caught up.. yea in the 80's and early 90's ford was winning but gm is killing them now... and ford can't come up with a motor that isn't supercharged with power in production cars... the new vette has what 500hp n/a... even if it is a 5.7 l it still woops fords ass.

Posted by: klutch

Quote:

Originally Posted by BlackMark8Li

Actually it takes them 7.0L for 500HP. And another thing ford has going for them is staying in business if gm is so good why is everyone saying they will be bankraupt in 5 years? they already laid off 20,000 employees and have this discount thing going.

Posted by: ONEBADMK8

Quote:

Originally Posted by klutch

5 years? LOL they are filing this Month!! Read Autoweek!

Posted by: ONEBADMK8

Quote:

Originally Posted by MarkOfDeath

how about comparing us ( the faster half) to the gtos thats fare, those goats are for gays

BELIEVE me the Guy couldnt drive. My uncle has a bone stock 04' Automatic that went flat 14's.

Posted by: klutch

Quote:

Originally Posted by ONEBADMK8

5 years? LOL they are filing this Month!! Read Autoweek!

woah definitely gonna go out and pickup a copy of Autoweek thanks for the info. Meanwhile ford still stands (sorry couldn't resist)

Posted by: lincolnboy

this is got rubber.......

Posted by: dertyclown

http://videos.streetfire.net/Player...D2-361777347C64

Posted by: 67Continental

Quote:

Originally Posted by BlackMark8Li

dude, there are 11 second mark viii's......street driven.

Posted by: 67Continental

Quote:

Originally Posted by lincolnboy

this is got rubber.......

hehe, GOT TUB!

Posted by: lincolnboy

i was planning on gettin my mark mini tubed, but sold her. which would involve alot more then a regular mini tub. mini tub it self would have cost 500$...

w/ a solid axle

Posted by: scott9050

The Z06 used 427 inches and every trick in the book to get the Z06 to where it is, and Ford used a 5.4 with a twin screw to get to where they are. Now who is faster? The Ford GT has already hit 10's and 133 mph traps stock, the Z06 by all estimates is 5-7 mph slower.

5 spd Mach I's are pretty much dead even with stock LS1's. Anyone who thinks Ford can not build a fast N/A engine is smoking crack, the 400 hp crate modular 5.0 and the old 385 horse 5.4 in the "R" proved that they can, they just chose to do give enthusiasts what they wanted. The 500 should match the Z06's 1/4 mile speed with very minimal mods, though it will never handle like the Vette.

Posted by: BlackMark8Li

Quote:

Originally Posted by 67Continental

dude, there are 11 second mark viii's......street driven.

yea 11 sec marks on all motor? not supercharged or turbo or lazy ass noz

Posted by: 67Continental

no, not on all motor, but hardly stripped out interiors like you made them out to be....

Posted by: 67Continental

here's a vid of me burning out in the lincoln, about 2 mins into the vid. you can also see my inertia switch cutting the fuel off as i do a 180 in the car.

Posted by: BlackMark8Li

Quote:

Originally Posted by 67Continental

here's a vid of me burning out in the lincoln, about 2 mins into the vid. you can also see my inertia switch cutting the fuel off as i do a 180 in the car.

the stripped out interioprs were meant to be w/o boost.. which if any of you have read nmy posts should have seen what I was talking about... new factory production gm's cars vs new factory ford cars ... ford can't compete unless they have boost. I'm not talking about crate engines you can order... engines actually put into production cars.. gm has ford beat.for now at least.

Posted by: klutch

It isn't always about power take the new grand prix gxp 303HP/312TQ its more powerfull than the new GT which has 300HP/320TQ (it still takes gm 5.3L to make 3 more HP than ford makes with 4.6L) but what good is 303HP/312TQ with Front Wheel Drive its just asking for trouble. so see Horsepower isn't everything (can anyone say Torque Steer?) I'm sure most would choose the cheaper mustang with 3 less horsepower over the overpriced (like all gm vehicles) grand prix. Wouldn't You?

Posted by: unstoppable

Quote:

Originally Posted by BlackMark8Li

I'm not talking about crate engines you can order... engines actually put into production cars.. gm has ford beat.for now at least.

Now here is where you are wrong.GM doesnt have a pony car anymore.
Probably because people got sick of looking at the POS PEP Boys interior they put into those rattle traps they called F bodies.So sales dropped off RAPIDLY and they took them off of the market.

Posted by: BlackIceLSC

Quote:

Originally Posted by 67Continental

here's a vid of me burning out in the lincoln, about 2 mins into the vid. you can also see my inertia switch cutting the fuel off as i do a 180 in the car.

No linky!

I wanted to see this one!

re-post it with the link to the vid, you big tease!

Posted by: 67Continental

damn, how did i forget? here's the link:

http://www.pcmtl.com/downloads/video...-meet_250k.zip

right click and save as.

Posted by: K*A*B

Quote:

Originally Posted by BlackMark8Li

go argue with mustang guys about chevy vs ford http://www.corral.net/forums/, i hate arguing with people who don't know anything
i have a factory 1300 cc vehicle that will beat any production chevy ever made , in the 1/4 (or any other production car ever made for that matter )

Posted by: ONEBADMK8

Quote:

Originally Posted by lincolnboy

i was planning on gettin my mark mini tubed, but sold her. which would involve alot more then a regular mini tub. mini tub it self would have cost 500$...

w/ a solid axle

WOW Lemme know where on Earth your getting a REAL Mini Tub job for $500.00?

Posted by: NYC LS8

Quote:

Originally Posted by ONEBADMK8

WOW Lemme know where on Earth your getting a REAL Mini Tub job for $500.00?

Where you get yours - Photoshop

Posted by: BlackMark8Li

Quote:

Originally Posted by K*A*B

first off where do you get off saying I don't know anything? second I can care less about your race car you have and how fast it is because if you would get the crap out of your ears and listen for the last time I AM NOT TALKING ABOUT PEOPLE MODDING CARS into race cars... I AM TALKING ABOUT FACTORY PRODUCTION CARS that have been produced in the late 90's and even today. what factory production car do you own from the late 90's to today that is 1300 cc's? and I bet its boosted anyways which was my whole point, ford needs boost to do something better.

Posted by: 67Continental

i think he's talking about a bike.

Posted by: unstoppable

Quote:

Originally Posted by NYC LSC

Where you get yours - Photoshop

The photoshop job was just to give me an idea of how it was going to look.
I finally got off my butt and the real deal is starting to come together.

No way in hell you can get a DECENT mini tub job for 500 bucks.
To buy a set from Summit is 69.99 X 2 just for the material.
Now if you find a guy who will cut out your existing fender wells and weld/rivot in the new ones, then you found a guy who doesnt know what he is doing.Cause no one that knows what they are doing will charge only 360 for the amount of work it takes.

Posted by: BlackMark8Li

Quote:

Originally Posted by 67Continental

i think he's talking about a bike.

ok then that makes sense but no sense considering we were talking about cars... not bikes.

Posted by: NYC LS8

Quote:

Originally Posted by unstoppable

The photoshop job was just to give me an idea of how it was going to look.
I finally got off my butt and the real deal is starting to come together.

Geno knows I'm playin'. No need for an explanation

Posted by: K*A*B

Quote:

Originally Posted by BlackMark8Li

ok then that makes sense but no sense considering we were talking about cars... not bikes.

but it is ok for you to compare a lincoln with a corvette
you obviously know nothing , go read some more magazines or forums or whatever you get all of your misinformation from

funny thing is i beat a 96 vette with my 93 lincoln

Posted by: NYC LS8

lol

Posted by: BlackMark8Li

Quote:

Originally Posted by K*A*B

and I beat a 99 vette with my 93 lincoln too... its a way faster car but the driver didn't know how to drive.

I really wasn't refering to only the lincoln mark 8 vs the vette.. again you should learn to read better.. I said ford vs gm.. I was mainly talking about mustangs and camaros, trans ams and vettes when I was talking about boost. I had mentioned them several times.

Posted by: K*A*B

and i guess i was wrong to think you weren't talking about just lincoln's with a quote like this
don't compare the imp cause its slow, compare the older marks with newer vettes and camaros

but i can't read

Quote:

Originally Posted by BlackMark8Li

Posted by: BlackMark8Li

Quote:

Originally Posted by K*A*B

and i guess i was wrong to think you weren't talking about just lincoln's with a quote like this
don't compare the imp cause its slow, compare the older marks with newer vettes and camaros

but i can't read

ok you have a point.. sorry.

Posted by: lincolnboy

Quote:

Originally Posted by unstoppable

they is a local guy i ask him already,... and what kinda car i had...i know that is not going to cover the other materail needed....but since i dont have the mk i wont know how much its going to cost......know!!!

Posted by: GT40MkIV

If GM cars are so technologically superior to Fords, then how come the 3 fastest production cars in existince are Ford powered? The McLaren F1 isnt fastest anymore, that title goes to a Sweedish supercar called the Konisegg and it has a 620 horsepower supercharged 4.6 DOHC in it.

Posted by: klutch

Quote:

Originally Posted by BlackMark8Li

You keep talking about supercharging what is wrong with supercharging? I am not a fan of Turbo's or Nitrous Oxide but what is wrong with Supercharging?

Posted by: BlackIceLSC

wow...I came to this thread looking for more burnout vids...instead I see a bunch of Ford vs Chevy crap. C'mon gang... let it go...This place is too cool for bickering...now stop typing, and go film more burnouts!!!

Posted by: JC1994

Worst case of key board war I have ever seen!!! face it, you can't win every race!! no matter what you drive!!

Posted by: buddylee

I just spoke with my friend who was telling me about how for years GM has putting some crappy motors. His 2000 chevy truck , need a new motor less that a year after he got it new. He told me of about 4
other guy with chevy trucks with same type of problems

Anyone think of buying a GM look up Silent Recall.

Posted by: klutch

Not a war more of a discussion I don't hate GM I like a few of there cars actually but Ford is the superior vehicle imo I mean look at limo companys they must choose lincolns over cadillacs for a reason?

Posted by: BlackMark8Li

Quote:

Originally Posted by klutch

You keep talking about supercharging what is wrong with supercharging? I am not a fan of Turbo's or Nitrous Oxide but what is wrong with Supercharging?

nothing is wrong with it at all. if I had money I'd get it in a heartbeat. my only point is ford supercharges everything to compete and yet gm builds up on all motor. now nitrous I hate mainly cause of people with slow pos imports get it and think there car is the fastest thing on the road

theres good and bad to gm and ford in regards to engine life. I had my mark engine fail at 86k with a broken rod... yet my 93 had 150k on the clock and still ran stronger than anything.

Posted by: buddylee

Quote:

Originally Posted by klutch

Not a war more of a discussion I don't hate GM I like a few of there cars actually but Ford is the superior vehicle imo I mean look at limo companys they must choose lincolns over cadillacs for a reason?

G.W. rolls in a Cad so does Mrs Bush.

Posted by: StraDog

Quote:

Originally Posted by buddylee

G.W. rolls in a Cad so does Mrs Bush.

We ALL know G.W. makes stupid decisions...

Posted by: StraDog

With all said and done, Fellas...

Let's post some BURNOUTS !!!

Posted by: buddylee

read # 18 Johnson Vs. GM Silent Recalls suck

[18] The plaintiffs averred that GM knew of stalling problems in the model truck in question and did not alert its customers. Instead, they asserted, GM issued a "silent" or "unpublished" recall whereby it informed all of its dealers to replace the PROM with a newly designed PROM if a customer complained that his engine stalled.

[19] GM stated that no defect existed in the truck or the PROM and that in fact, the engine was running and that Lewis negligently drove through the intersection causing the accident. GM claimed that it did not issue a silent recall, but had simply improved the PROM and had merely informed its dealers of such improvements.

[20] At trial, Lewis testified that as he started driving through the intersection, his truck stalled. Lewis said he saw an 18-wheel, tractor-trailer truck fully loaded with logs approaching the intersection from about 700 feet away. Lewis claimed that he put the truck in "park" and tried to crank the engine, but that the engine would not start. The driver of the tractor-trailer truck testified that he blew his horn, then steered the truck into the left lane in an attempt to avoid colliding with Lewis. The tractor-trailer truck struck the pickup truck on the right side.

Posted by: BlackIceLSC

Quote:

Originally Posted by klutch

I mean look at limo companys they must choose lincolns over cadillacs for a reason?

I run a Limo company. 20+ vehicles. Trust me...you dont want to go there. yes, we run Town Cars, not GM vehicles...but not because of the reasons you think. Oh, and from 2003-on, The T-car is a giant heap of donkey dung.

That settles it... I'm going to have to go to our lot tomorrow, and film some LIMO burnouts!!!(and yes...they will!)

Posted by: klutch

Quote:

Originally Posted by BlackIceLSC

Just out of Curiosity what is the reason they use Lincolns if its not for reliability?

Posted by: 67Continental

no comments on my burnout

Posted by: StraDog

Quote:

Originally Posted by 67Continental

no comments on my burnout

File doesn't work for me

...

Bet it was badass tho.

Posted by: Sergmark

BlackIceLSC,
I drove Lincoln limos for about a year. I just wanted to say I have done a 360 with a 120" strech and yes there was snow on the ground. Must have been a rush for the passengers............

Posted by: NYC LS8

Quote:

Originally Posted by 67Continental

no comments on my burnout

Mine neither. Don't feel bad lol

Posted by: StraDog

Quote:

Originally Posted by NYC LSC

Mine neither. Don't feel bad lol

Hmm... I just watched your video and it is BADASSS!!!

Did you have a posi rearend at the time ? What else did you have done ? It was a hell of a burnout, fo sho !

Posted by: Sergmark

67 Coninental... That was an awesome one burner... DO you feel better. WE don't want any sad members around here.....

Posted by: NYC LS8

Quote:

Originally Posted by StraDog

Hmm... I just watched your video and it is BADASSS!!!

Did you have a posi rearend at the time ? What else did you have done ? It was a hell of a burnout, fo sho !

LOL thanks.

Back then it was a stock motor with bolt ons and exhaust. 4.10s and a rebuilt trac-lok, too.

I'd do one in the 95, but I'm afraid the trans'll blow up lol

Posted by: honestabe

Here's one I did awhile ago.

Right click and save

Posted by: Sifrino3

Quote:

Originally Posted by honestabe

Here's one I did awhile ago.

Right click and save

One leggers, is not the best to show. Just my .02. . .

Posted by: 67Continental

one leggers, is what most of us got.

Posted by: JC1994

Talk about one leggers,I did one a couple of years ago,on the street I live on, more smoke than a Sea Foam tune up!!! The black mark was about 200 feet long!! And you can still see it on the street! I know I pissed some people off there was no wind that night and the smoke just hung in the air!!! LOL!!

Posted by: Grifter

i'll have to get a pic of the Mark with 315's on it

no, they arent staying on there.. just a set of 17x10.5's i had laying around with some worn out 315's on them.. amazingly they fit on there pretty well.. only the ebrake cable was in teh way.. fab up a bracket to pull that out of the way and they would clear..

Posted by: Sifrino3

One leggers, are just gay. Any one can spin one wheel with 200 horses. Gzzz, delete this thread.

Posted by: NYC LS8

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sifrino3

One leggers, are just gay. Any one can spin one wheel with 200 horses. Gzzz, delete this thread.

I don't see you doin' any better

Posted by: Sifrino3

Quote:

Originally Posted by NYC LSC

I don't see you doin' any better

I don't do them. I don't see the need. It just doesn't do it for me. It is a waste to my rubber. Did it three times. All three times it wastn't for me. Someone else wanted to see it. So, I showed them.

Posted by: NYC LS8

I don't see the need either, but I've done them. To come in here to a forum of cars which you don't own is gay.

You're a moderator - act like one.

Posted by: Sifrino3

Quote:

Originally Posted by NYC LSC

I don't see the need either, but I've done them. To come in here to a forum of cars which you don't own is gay.

You're a moderator - act like one.

Hey im just speaking what comes natural. When you open a thread you expect comments. Not all comments are going to be the same. (Good or Bad) That is why we are not all the same. Alot of things wouldn't be the same in todays world if one mind controlled all.

Posted by: 67Continental

and judging by this thread, most comments will have nothing to do with the original subject.

Posted by: JC1994

Posted by: StraDog

I basically just made this thread to show off a few pics I had from the weekend before. I rarely do burnout's, so when I got a few pics of it in action, I thought it looked pretty pimp, so I posted em.

I didn't want to start a GM vs Ford b!tch fit, nor anything else really. Just posted a few pics and it turned into something else. It's all good, relax.

Posted by: Dern Humpus

Quote:

Originally Posted by klutch

You keep talking about supercharging what is wrong with supercharging? I am not a fan of Turbo's or Nitrous Oxide but what is wrong with Supercharging?

What the hell is wrong with a turbocharger?

Posted by: klutch

Turbo Lag. there may be improvments but its still there. And I don't have to wait to turn off my car with a Supercharger.

Posted by: 67Continental

you don't have to wait to turn off your car with a turbo either, you can run a timer like many people do. turbo's and supers are two ways of looking a the same problem and they both have their place in different applications.

Posted by: klutch

yes I know about turbo timers (I own a turbocharged vehicle) and I will never buy another one its either supercharging or all engine for me from now on. I will never buy another turbocharged vehicle as long as I live.

Posted by: 67Continental

what turbo car do you own, out of curiousity.

Posted by: klutch

No bashing me

but its a 04 Mitsubishi Evolution 8 which I am going to sell soon (I don't know when and how much before anyone asks)

Posted by: 67Continental

i would never bash you - that's my japanese dream car. they are not legal for import in canada. i wish they were.

Posted by: klutch

:O not legal thats some crap, They are great cars I don't regret buying it at all (even tho it is turbo'd) AWD is a plus to. I am just going back to RWD V8 because I can work on and tune them myself. Can't say that about the evo lol

Finance:Debt Help:Php Scripts:Big Brother 10:Song Lyrics