cadillac, cadillac cts, cadillac seville, cadillac forums, lincolns of distinction, forum, lincoln mark viii, Performance, parts, lincoln, mark viii, mark vii, lincoln ls, lincoln town car

Lincoln vs Cadillac Forums


(This is the forums archive - If you want to get back to the main site simply click the banner above and you will be taken to our homepage.)

Lincoln vs Cadillac Forums is the Ultimate Online Resource for Owners and Enthusiasts of American Luxury Cars. Feel free to browse through our archive - but make sure you make it back to our main site - Lincoln vs Cadillac Forums




Cadillac XLR : Cadillac CTS : Cadillac : 2005 Cadillac STS : Cadillac Forums : 2000 Lincoln LS : Lincoln Mark VIII : Lincoln Mark VII : Car Wax
Lincoln Town Car : Lincoln Air Suspension : Lincoln Continental : Lemon Law : Do It Yourself Car Repair : Lincoln vs Cadillac Forums : Mesothelioma



Back to the Archive Main Page


Pages: 1

Governmentium

(Click here to view the original thread with full colors/images)


Posted by: barry2952

A major research institution has just announced the discovery of the heaviest element yet known to science. The new element has been named "Governmentium". Governmentium has one neutron, 12 assistant neutrons, 75 deputy neutrons, and 224 assistant deputy neutrons, giving it an atomic mass of 311.

These 311 particles are held together by forces called morons, which are surrounded by vast quantities of lepton-like particles called peons. Since Governmentium has no electrons, it is inert. However, it can be detected, as it impedes every reaction with which it comes into contact.

A minute amount of Governmentium causes one reaction to take over 4 days to complete, when it would normally take less than a second.

Governmentium has a normal half-life of 4 years; it does not decay, but, instead undergoes a reorganization in which a portion of the assistant neutrons and deputy neutrons exchange places.

In fact, Governmentium's mass will actually increase over time, since each reorganization will cause more morons to become neutrons, forming isodopes. This characteristic of moron-promotion leads some scientists to believe that Governmentium is formed whenever morons reach a certain quantity in concentration. This hypothetical quantity is referred to as "Critical Morass". When catalyzed with money Governmentium becomes Administratium, an element which radiates just as much energy, since it has 1/2 as many peons but twice as many morons.



Posted by: Joeychgo

Rofl



Posted by: eL eS

Bwahahaha. Very clever.



Posted by: Gruuvin8

Haha! very clever indeed!!

this is why I would like less Governmentium

Whats the phrase, "never underestimate the power of stoopid people in large numbers"?

(mobocracy)



Posted by: Vitas

Web Results 1 - 10 of about 809 for A major research institution has just announced the discovery of the heaviest element yet known to science. The new element has been named "Governmentium". . (0.32 seconds)

Discovery of the heaviest chemical element yet known to science
"A major research institution has announced the discovery of the heaviest chemical
element ... This new element has been tentatively named Governmentium." ...
tianews.com/tianews/breaking/ 02-12-05/BreakingNews_02-13-05.htm - 2k - Cached - Similar pages

New Element Discovered - Politics at ATS Discussion Community
Discusion about New Element Discovered in the Above Top Secret website discussion
... A major research institution has just announced the discovery of the ...
politics.abovetopsecret.com/thread137262/pg1 - 30k - Cached - Similar pages

Autonomous Source: Science news
A major research institution has just announced the discovery of the heaviest
element yet known to science. The new element has been named ‘’Governmentium’. ...
autonomoussource.com/archive/000620.html - 10k - Cached - Similar pages

PropertyTalk.co.nz - SCIENTISTS DISCOVER NEW ELEMENT - GOVERNMENTIUM
A major research institution has just announced the discovery of the heaviest
element yet known to science. The new element has been named "Governmentium." ...
www.propertytalk.co.nz/posts3137-highlight.html - 29k - Cached - Similar pages

Scientists discover new element
A major research institution has just announced the discovery of the heaviest
element yet known to science. The new element has been named "Governmentium". ...
www.ruralnorthwest.com/ artman/publish/article_4887.shtml - 20k - Cached - Similar pages

New Political 'Element' Discovered!
A major research institution has recently announced the discovery of the heaviest
chemical yet known to science. This new element has been ...
www.bikeforums.net/archive/index.php/t-94363 - Similar pages

The Heaviest Element
... has recently announced the discovery of the heaviest element yet known to
science. This new element has been tentatively named "Governmentium. ...
www.canadiancontent.net/forums/about5370.html - 29k - Cached - Similar pages

DOOL Discussion Group -- The New Element
A major research institution has recently announced the discovery of the heaviest
... yet known to science. The new element has been named "Governmentium. ...
www.mediadomain.com/cgi-bin/ netforum/dool_fan/a.cgi/3-26 - 7k - Cached - Similar pages

News!! New Element Discovered
A major research institution has recently announced the discovery of the heaviest
chemical ... The new element has been tentatively named "Governmentium. ...
www.ozzu.com/ftopic28862.html - 46k - Cached - Similar pages

News Hounds: New Element Discovered in Washington, DC
A major research institution has recently announced the discovery of the heaviest
chemical ... The new element has been tentatively named "Governmentium." ...
www.newshounds.us/2004/10/19/ new_element_discovered_in_washington_dc.php - 21k - Cached - Similar pages


http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&q...=Google+Search



Posted by: eL eS

Quote:
Originally Posted by Gruuvin8
Haha! very clever indeed!!

this is why I would like less Governmentium

Whats the phrase, "never underestimate the power of stoopid people in large numbers"?

(mobocracy)
I concur.



Posted by: eL eS

Quote:
Originally Posted by Vitas
Web Results 1 - 10 of about 809 for A major research institution has just announced the discovery of the heaviest element yet known to science. The new element has been named "Governmentium". . (0.32 seconds)

Discovery of the heaviest chemical element yet known to science
"A major research institution has announced the discovery of the heaviest chemical
element ... This new element has been tentatively named Governmentium." ...
tianews.com/tianews/breaking/ 02-12-05/BreakingNews_02-13-05.htm - 2k - Cached - Similar pages

New Element Discovered - Politics at ATS Discussion Community
Discusion about New Element Discovered in the Above Top Secret website discussion
... A major research institution has just announced the discovery of the ...
politics.abovetopsecret.com/thread137262/pg1 - 30k - Cached - Similar pages

Autonomous Source: Science news
A major research institution has just announced the discovery of the heaviest
element yet known to science. The new element has been named ‘’Governmentium’. ...
autonomoussource.com/archive/000620.html - 10k - Cached - Similar pages

PropertyTalk.co.nz - SCIENTISTS DISCOVER NEW ELEMENT - GOVERNMENTIUM
A major research institution has just announced the discovery of the heaviest
element yet known to science. The new element has been named "Governmentium." ...
www.propertytalk.co.nz/posts3137-highlight.html - 29k - Cached - Similar pages

Scientists discover new element
A major research institution has just announced the discovery of the heaviest
element yet known to science. The new element has been named "Governmentium". ...
www.ruralnorthwest.com/ artman/publish/article_4887.shtml - 20k - Cached - Similar pages

New Political 'Element' Discovered!
A major research institution has recently announced the discovery of the heaviest
chemical yet known to science. This new element has been ...
www.bikeforums.net/archive/index.php/t-94363 - Similar pages

The Heaviest Element
... has recently announced the discovery of the heaviest element yet known to
science. This new element has been tentatively named "Governmentium. ...
www.canadiancontent.net/forums/about5370.html - 29k - Cached - Similar pages

DOOL Discussion Group -- The New Element
A major research institution has recently announced the discovery of the heaviest
... yet known to science. The new element has been named "Governmentium. ...
www.mediadomain.com/cgi-bin/ netforum/dool_fan/a.cgi/3-26 - 7k - Cached - Similar pages

News!! New Element Discovered
A major research institution has recently announced the discovery of the heaviest
chemical ... The new element has been tentatively named "Governmentium. ...
www.ozzu.com/ftopic28862.html - 46k - Cached - Similar pages

News Hounds: New Element Discovered in Washington, DC
A major research institution has recently announced the discovery of the heaviest
chemical ... The new element has been tentatively named "Governmentium." ...
www.newshounds.us/2004/10/19/ new_element_discovered_in_washington_dc.php - 21k - Cached - Similar pages


http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&q=A+major+research+institution+has+ju st+announced+the+discovery+of+the+heaviest+element +yet+known+to+science.+The+new+element+has+been+na med+%22Governmentium%22.+&btnG=Google+Search
Appears someone did not credit their source

LKs like a liberal conspiracy



Posted by: Gruuvin8

I suppose there is hope for us all, barry, if you support the view of less government by making this post.
It is the liberals that vote for more govt. and the conservatives who vote for less govt.
seems like you think this post is funny cuz you dont like big govt., am I right? Then why support a liberal agenda which would increase govt.?



Posted by: barry2952

I see Vitas is being anal-retentive again. I didn't quote a source because it was sent to me as a joke. My sister was the source. It is pretty funny. Sorry that I broke a rule. I think that just about everyone figured out it was a joke by the end of the first paragraph. At least you should have been able to figure it out.

I don't know how many times I have to repeat myself. I am not a Liberal. I share some of their fundamental beliefs but I land clearly in Conservative territory.

It's just that I hate George Bush because he lied to us repeatedly about Iraq. He made a fool out of us and I'm still real pissed off about it.

He also lied about his administrations affiliation with religion. He lied about so many things that I can't believe a word he says. There are many of us out there that are disgusted with GWB.



Posted by: barry2952

Quote:
Originally Posted by Gruuvin8
I suppose there is hope for us all, barry, if you support the view of less government by making this post.
It is the liberals that vote for more govt. and the conservatives who vote for less govt.
seems like you think this post is funny cuz you dont like big govt., am I right? Then why support a liberal agenda which would increase govt.?
Isn't our current government is the largest ever?

Isn't the National Debt the largest it's ever been?

Aren't those two pretty basic Conservative talking points?



Posted by: Vitas

Merriam-Webster Online Dictionary

One entry found for plagiarize.

Main Entry: pla·gia·rize
Pronunciation: 'plA-j&-"rIz also -jE-&-
Function: verb
Inflected Form(s): -rized; -riz·ing
Etymology: plagiary
transitive senses : to steal and pass off (the ideas or words of another) as one's own : use (another's production) without crediting the source
intransitive senses : to commit literary theft : present as new and original an idea or product derived from an existing source
- pla·gia·riz·er noun

http://www.m-w.com/cgi-bin/dictionar...va=plagiarized



Posted by: eL eS

Quote:
Originally Posted by barry2952
Isn't our current government is the largest ever?

Isn't the National Debt the largest it's ever been?

Aren't those two pretty basic Conservative talking points?
according to the figures I just seen on cspan our national debt will be recending this year. You can expect a guy to do a 3 point turn around on a single lane dirt road with a caddilac sized problem left by his predecessor.

I fail to see where our goverment has gone from acute to obtuse; can you provide me with some substanitated examples?



Posted by: eL eS

Quote:
Originally Posted by barry2952
I see Vitas is being anal-retentive again. I didn't quote a source because it was sent to me as a joke. My sister was the source. It is pretty funny. Sorry that I broke a rule. I think that just about everyone figured out it was a joke by the end of the first paragraph. At least you should have been able to figure it out.

I don't know how many times I have to repeat myself. I am not a Liberal. I share some of their fundamental beliefs but I land clearly in Conservative territory.

It's just that I hate George Bush because he lied to us repeatedly about Iraq. He made a fool out of us and I'm still real pissed off about it.

He also lied about his administrations affiliation with religion. He lied about so many things that I can't believe a word he says. There are many of us out there that are disgusted with GWB.
Would it have been to much to add hey this was sent to me from a... I do it as courtesy to the originator even if I do not know who it is.

Ya' go over board to blame the conservatives for riding the coat tails of liberals and within the same frame of time post something as if it were original content.

Yes, it appeared tobe a joke to me and at the same time I thought you to be the source. How dare me to believe you to be so original.

Am I to suppose you are not?



Posted by: eL eS

Quote:
Originally Posted by barry2952
I don't know how many times I have to repeat myself. I am not a Liberal. I share some of their fundamental beliefs but I land clearly in Conservative territory.
Was this joke sent to you by your sister as well?



Posted by: Joeychgo

Vitas - thank you - I didnt realize your the internet police.

You know, I post jokes I find all the time. How come you dont criticize me?

Dont concern yourself barry, its all good.



Posted by: eL eS

Quote:
Originally Posted by Joeychgo
Vitas - thank you - I didnt realize your the internet police.

You know, I post jokes I find all the time. How come you dont criticize me?

Dont concern yourself barry, its all good.
I belive I started it really by commenting on his posting which would have otherwise gone uncommented on and had I known it was offensive to make lite of the matter would have checked with the internet police first.

Maybe rather than Barrying replying Vitas was being anal retentive, which to me seems to elicit a fight, barry could have simple stated yes this was sent to me by a relative. That would have been the end of it.

Personally Barry was out of line in his retort.



Posted by: Joeychgo

Quote:
Originally Posted by eL eS
I started it and had I known it was offensive to make lite of the matter would have checked with the internet police first.
Its not offensive. I think Its great.



Posted by: eL eS

Quote:
Originally Posted by Joeychgo
Its not offensive. I think Its great.
My bad it appeared that barry was getting back up and Vitas was getting dissed. I stand corrected.



Posted by: Vitas

Quote:
Originally Posted by Joeychgo
Vitas - thank you - I didnt realize your the internet police.

You know, I post jokes I find all the time. How come you dont criticize me?

Dont concern yourself barry, its all good.
If I have to explain the concepts of attributing sources to their authors, or improperly creating the impression that a post originated with the writer, trust me, it is not worth it.



Posted by: eL eS

Quote:
Originally Posted by Vitas
If I have to explain the concepts of attributing sources to their authors, or improperly creating the impression that a post originated with the writer, trust me, it is not worth it.
next...?



Posted by: Joeychgo

Quote:
Originally Posted by eL eS
My bad it appeared that barry was getting back up and Vitas was getting dissed. I stand corrected.


The point was that you were making lite. Thats the way things should be- we're suppose to be friends here, not nit picking each other at every turn.



Posted by: eL eS

Quote:
Originally Posted by Joeychgo
The point was that you were making lite. Thats the way things should be- we're suppose to be friends here, not nit picking each other at every turn.
Agreed. I would like to refer you to Barrys accusations that I get my ideas and comments from third parties. If we are friends here one would think we would not come to such conclusions without being able substantiate them.

Quote:
Originally Posted by barry2952
Actually, If you'd bothered to read any of the previous posts on this site before you added your drivel you'd find that the only consistancy is the Conservatives deflecting blame for everything onto everyone but themselves.

Bush's popularity contest is over. Only 41% now think we're going in the right direction. I love the smell of impeachment in the air.

And yes, you have well proven to be just another right wing nut job. It's like listening to a recording of Rush. Don't you have any original thoughts? You're worse than Monstermark. He just posts to elicit a response. You just post to spew your kind of hate.

I think MonsterMark is even tiring of your overblown ego.
in regards to my post.

Quote:
Originally Posted by eL eS
The only thing the far left can do is shout and act angry in an attempt to make thier agenda more palatable and/pr believable and to enlist those on the fringe that have done nothing but disenfranchise themselves.

You need look no farther than barry's retorts to recognize the patterns. Heck my first posts in to the political forum he lead in with ahh another right wing nut job and a few other disparaging terms. Completely consistent with the rest of the party.
Believe me i will not take someone elses material without giving credit especially in the political, or technical as far a things go, forum where emotions can run high and credit is due to the originator of orginal thought.



Posted by: eL eS

I assure you I will not quote without credit and you will never discover me posting anything which leads to hate nor violence like some participants so willingly do.

Before we proceed maybe we shoud wait for barry to return to clarify his comments on Vitas and me. Pursuit of this any further would not be fair without his participation.



Posted by: Joeychgo

I think everyone needs to cool it - this isnt about attacking each other. I see alot of insults traded, and I know its more in the heat of passion, but everyone has to show a little respect for each other. Good humor is the goal here folks. Even if your debating with some right wing nut job with an overblown ego or left wing commie pinko plagerist.

GET A GRIP GUYS! THIS IS SUPPOSE TO BE FUN!




Posted by: eL eS

Quote:
Originally Posted by Joeychgo
I think everyone needs to cool it - this isnt about attacking each other. I see alot of insults traded, and I know its more in the heat of passion, but everyone has to show a little respect for each other. Good humor is the goal here folks. Even if your debating with some right wing nut job with an overblown ego or left wing commie pinko plagerist.

GET A GRIP GUYS! THIS IS SUPPOSE TO BE FUN!

No arguments here. Politics can be very emotional and all to often humor is the victim of good intention when it comes to politics.

I propose that if you intend to politically disparage someone in humor that you take the precautionary measure of adding smileys. just my 2 cents.



Posted by: Vitas

Quote:
Originally Posted by eL eS
Before we proceed maybe we shoud wait for barry to return to clarify his comments on Vitas and me. Pursuit of this any further would not be fair without his participation.
-lol-



Posted by: barry2952

The Administrator has asked me to ignore Vitas. I hope you all will do the same.



Posted by: eL eS

Quote:
Originally Posted by eL eS
Appears someone did not credit their source

LKs like a liberal conspiracy
I just want to clarify my post here. As a rule I credit the orginator of technical information as long as I can remember and will even go as for to just say another member...etc.

But with a joke I can't say that I would 100% of the time. Ususally the credit is delivered when I FWD the email but in a public forum you really don't want to copy and pasted the full email. You risk posting email addresses and we all know the consiquence for doing that.

At any rate I'd hoped the use of smileys would have properly conveyed my attempt at humor here but it didn't. we are writing a thesis,r erradicating a hunger crisis or resolving a global conflict. So please for the sake of those who might be passing through to check the place out lets keep some sense of civility in our levities.

I now return you to your regularly scheduled forum already in progress.



Posted by: JohnnyBz00LS

This started out as an attempt at humor, but now

Quote:
Originally Posted by eL eS
according to the figures I just seen on cspan our national debt will be recending this year. You can expect a guy to do a 3 point turn around on a single lane dirt road with a caddilac sized problem left by his predecessor.
There you go again, talking out your blow hole. GWBs is the one who blew the budget SURPLUS and blew away all the GAIN on the DEBT obtained during the Clinton administration.



Posted by: eL eS

Quote:
Originally Posted by JohnnyBz00LS
This started out as an attempt at humor, but now



There you go again, talking out your blow hole. GWBs is the one who blew the budget SURPLUS and blew away all the GAIN on the DEBT obtained during the Clinton administration.
PFFFFFFT shhhhhhh, blow hole exhale and inhale.... would it be too much to ask you to ascend to the surface?

There was no surplus. Your surplus never existed but on paper. Listen I spen a lot of time watching cspan and reading and I only comment on what I hear them, the politicains, say or reporters write.



Posted by: Gruuvin8

the original message in this thread looked like a joke, smelled like a joke, etc. etc. who cares where it came from? I assumed it was found somewhere on the internet, and it was posted on the internet... so who cares???

Quote:
GWBs is the one who blew the budget SURPLUS and blew away all the GAIN on the DEBT obtained during the Clinton administration.
Ever heard of trickle down economics? know what that means? Figure it out and ya might know where the economy boost actually came from!

as far as GWB goes.... conservatives are called greedy, ???? I personally don't mind if America makes a sacrifice to create peace in the middle east in efforts to educate people and stiffle terrorism. Why does the left have such a problem with this? And the left says that the oil man, GWB, is just after the oil in the middle east... well, have we taken their oil? NO!!!! are we promoting freedom in the middle east? YES!! Again, what's wrong with that? Personally, I think we deserve a break on middle east oil prices now as payment for all we've done. If we get it, great!!! are we demanding it? NO! but we deserve it. Look... it's a win win situation -- peace in the east, fair trade of oil. Who better to pay the price but the most powerful nation on earth, the only nation with the guts to lead the way. It is honorable!!! and those who oppose it have no honor, and they are the greedy ones!! (and wussies too!) So, the left calling the right greedy for approving of surplus $$$ spent to aid in peace in the east is like the pot calling the kettle black... which is all they do these days. How rediculous! Get a GRIP!!! What would the left like to do with this money? more govt. programs to give the lazy a free ride... God forbid the lazy libs have to get off their butts and actually work for what the get... if they had to do that they would start voting republican!! Since the left can't stand to lose power, they keep the little guy down, lazy and stupid.... the democrats in office are pi$$ing on you libs and telling you it's raining.... and trying to blame the right for it? LOL!!! Go back to school, take a class in economics while you are there, get smart, make lots of $$$ and then you'll realize the liberal/socialist/communist way of thinking is going to KILL the wealth in america!!



Posted by: eL eS

Quote:
Originally Posted by Gruuvin8
the original message in this thread looked like a joke, smelled like a joke, etc. etc. who cares where it came from? I assumed it was found somewhere on the internet, and it was posted on the internet... so who cares???


Ever heard of trickle down economics? know what that means? Figure it out and ya might know where the economy boost actually came from!

as far as GWB goes.... conservatives are called greedy, ???? I personally don't mind if America makes a sacrifice to create peace in the middle east in efforts to educate people and stiffle terrorism. Why does the left have such a problem with this? And the left says that the oil man, GWB, is just after the oil in the middle east... well, have we taken their oil? NO!!!! are we promoting freedom in the middle east? YES!! Again, what's wrong with that? Personally, I think we deserve a break on middle east oil prices now as payment for all we've done. If we get it, great!!! are we demanding it? NO! but we deserve it. Look... it's a win win situation -- peace in the east, fair trade of oil. Who better to pay the price but the most powerful nation on earth, the only nation with the guts to lead the way. It is honorable!!! and those who oppose it have no honor, and they are the greedy ones!! (and wussies too!) So, the left calling the right greedy for approving of surplus $$$ spent to aid in peace in the east is like the pot calling the kettle black... which is all they do these days. How rediculous! Get a GRIP!!! What would the left like to do with this money? more govt. programs to give the lazy a free ride... God forbid the lazy libs have to get off their butts and actually work for what the get... if they had to do that they would start voting republican!! Since the left can't stand to lose power, they keep the little guy down, lazy and stupid.... the democrats in office are pi$$ing on you libs and telling you it's raining.... and trying to blame the right for it? LOL!!! Go back to school, take a class in economics while you are there, get smart, make lots of $$$ and then you'll realize the liberal/socialist/communist way of thinking is going to KILL the wealth in america!!
Yep, uh huh, absolutely well heck... it all sounds about RIGHT to me.



Posted by: barry2952

Quote:
Originally Posted by Gruuvin8
the original message in this thread looked like a joke, smelled like a joke, etc. etc. who cares where it came from? I assumed it was found somewhere on the internet, and it was posted on the internet... so who cares???
Thank you!



Posted by: FreeFaller

Whatever...

That was some funny sh!t Barry...



Posted by: barry2952

I'm curious. How far into it did you realize it was a joke?



Posted by: FreeFaller

when I read the title...I thought it was obvious that you were just retelling a joke.



Posted by: barry2952

Did I appear to take credit for it?



Posted by: FreeFaller

Nope...Just a joke. Hell I've done the same thing. Do your thing Barry.

Now I gotta read your latest post so I can get back to arguing with you...he he



Posted by: JohnnyBz00LS

Quote:
Originally Posted by eL eS
PFFFFFFT shhhhhhh, blow hole exhale and inhale.... would it be too much to ask you to ascend to the surface?

There was no surplus. Your surplus never existed but on paper. Listen I spen a lot of time watching cspan and reading and I only comment on what I hear them, the politicains, say or reporters write.
http://zfacts.com/p/318.html

And an earlier discussion on this.........

http://www.lincolnvscadillac.com/sho...dget+defi cit



I hear there's a new 12-step program for you shrubbies living in denial. Let me find that link..................



Posted by: Gruuvin8

It was a funny joke! jokes found on the internet rarely site sources. if someone thought this was a serious post... well I hope you're not gonna be a chemistry major! lol



Posted by: eL eS

i didn't think it was serious! But I did think it was original content should have known better to think liberal sympathizers could come up with something so original. Sorry Barry next time I will know better



Posted by: eL eS

Quote:
Originally Posted by JohnnyBz00LS
http://zfacts.com/p/318.html

And an earlier discussion on this.........
You can note the demise of the cold war from 1980 to 1990 and from 2002 to present the demise of global terrorism THANK YOU. Plus the scale reaches to 2010 which has not even arrived so apparently some artistic liberties have been taken here. Go home liberal and uhh gimme my wallet back thief!



Posted by: Gruuvin8

Quote:
Originally Posted by eL eS
Go home liberal and uhh gimme my wallet back thief!
LOL!




Posted by: barry2952

Quote:
Originally Posted by Gruuvin8
LOL!
Hardly.



Posted by: eL eS

Quote:
Originally Posted by barry2952
Hardly.
you are right! It is no joke! I want my wallet back so Ican pay for my familys expenses not some crack smokin entitlement junkys. This is serious! Gruuvin8 you should be more serious



Posted by: barry2952

Quote:
Originally Posted by eL eS
i didn't think it was serious! But I did think it was original content should have known better to think liberal sympathizers could come up with something so original. Sorry Barry next time I will know better
So, you judge one's intelligence and creativity by their political leanings? That's just plain ignorant.



Posted by: eL eS

Tell you what liberal infidels. if your constiuents want hope and a hand up ask them to visit thier local church or synagogue. I work for folks in these agencies that help drug addicted people everyday and they do not get government funding and do not preach to these folks. Just good ol fashioned donations helping folks everyday no strings attached. No fat cat political middle man holding the purse strings there. Pure non-bureaucratic person to person help.

Get your hands out of my wallet liberal thief. You obfuscate your socialist agenda behind "entitlement" programs designed to keep people down. You do not promote people you hold their heads below the water line and only allow them to surface for air when it is convienent to your agenda.



Posted by: eL eS

Quote:
Originally Posted by barry2952
So, you judge one's intelligence and creativity by their political leanings? That's just plain ignorant.
what you didnt see the joke of course you didn't becasue you are guilty of the same thing you accuse me of!



Posted by: barry2952

That's lame. You should eschew obfuscation.



Posted by: eL eS

Quote:
Originally Posted by barry2952
That's lame. You should eschew obfuscation.
i did not hide my joke I am certain it was obvious as the mention of I see a liberal agenda. Which I would like to add was smileied. You should heed your own advice and stop avoid hiding behind falsehoods of a party that is intent on socialisng America.



Posted by: JohnnyBz00LS

Quote:
Originally Posted by eL eS
You can note the demise of the cold war from 1980 to 1990 and from 2002 to present the demise of global terrorism THANK YOU. Plus the scale reaches to 2010 which has not even arrived so apparently some artistic liberties have been taken here. Go home liberal and uhh gimme my wallet back thief!
But I thought that it was "trickle-down-economics" that was the cause of the GOP racking up the national debt? You shrubbies can't even make up your mind? (no suprise)

The only thing that happened during "trickle-down-economics" was the rich got richer and the poor got poorer. Yet the GOP platform states that they are looking out for the little guy? TWO-FACED!

The 2010 data is a PROJECTION based on the OMB's data. No spin required. Gee, didn't GW "promise" the national debt would be cut in 1/2 by '08?? LIAR! Broken promises! BULL-SH!TTER!

Go HOME commie and GIVE ME MY COUNTRY BACK!!



Posted by: eL eS

You guys are great a taking polls and obviously predicting the future 3 years out. Stick to trying to interpret the past well then agian maybe not you haven't done such a great job theire either.

Quote:
Originally Posted by JohnnyBz00LS
But I thought that it was "trickle-down-economics" that was the cause of the GOP racking up the national debt? You shrubbies can't even make up your mind? (no suprise)

The only thing that happened during "trickle-down-economics" was the rich got richer and the poor got poorer. Yet the GOP platform states that they are looking out for the little guy? TWO-FACED!

The 2010 data is a PROJECTION based on the OMB's data. No spin required. Gee, didn't GW "promise" the national debt would be cut in 1/2 by '08?? LIAR! Broken promises! BULL-SH!TTER!

Go HOME commie and GIVE ME MY COUNTRY BACK!!






vBulletin Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Limited.
vB Easy Archive Final ©2000 - 2008 - Created by Stefan "Xenon" Kaeser