Lincoln vs Cadillac Forums

(This is the forums archive - If you want to get back to the main site simply click the banner above and you will be taken to our homepage.)

Lincoln vs Cadillac Forums is the Ultimate Online Resource for Owners and Enthusiasts of American Luxury Cars. Feel free to browse through our archive - but make sure you make it back to our main site - Lincoln vs Cadillac Forums

Cadillac XLR : Cadillac CTS : Cadillac : 2005 Cadillac STS : Cadillac Forums : 2000 Lincoln LS : Lincoln Mark VIII : Lincoln Mark VII : Car Wax
Lincoln Town Car : Lincoln Air Suspension : Lincoln Continental : Lemon Law : Do It Yourself Car Repair : Lincoln vs Cadillac Forums : Mesothelioma

Back to the Archive Main Page

Pages: 1

GWB talking out both sides of his mouth again

(Click here to view the original thread with full colors/images)

Posted by: barry2952

"I've made it very clear to the Congress that the use of federal money, taxpayers' money, to promote science which destroys life in order to save life -- I'm against that. And therefore if the bill does that, I will veto it," GWB

OK, it's not OK to destroy life to save life but it's OK to destroy 100,000 Iraqi and 1,600 US soldier's lives to save other Iraqi lives. What a hypocrite!

Posted by: Kbob

You can't compare the two issues. Apples and oranges.

Posted by: MonsterMark

Quote:

Originally Posted by barry2952

OK, it's not OK to destroy life to save life but it's OK to destroy 100,000 Iraqi and 1,600 US soldier's lives to save other Iraqi lives. What a hypocrite!

At least those lives had a say in the outcome of their life. And don't tell me 100,000 civilians. You and I know thats bunk. If it was 100,000 military, too bad. Sounds like we missed 300,000 more. Well, there is always next year to catch up.

Posted by: barry2952

Quote:

Originally Posted by Kbob

You can't compare the two issues. Apples and oranges.

What? Unborn lives are precious and lives lost in wartime are not?

Posted by: JohnnyBz00LS

Seems the right clings to double standards at the whim of their desire to shove thier belief systems down other's throats.

Posted by: Kbob

I've explained that the death penalty is not contradictory to the right to life before. I've also explained that sending someone to do a job isn't the same as sending them to their death. Firefighters and cops that die in the line of duty are a perfect example of this. And when cops kill bad guys in a fire-fight, there's another example to chew on. Apples and oranges. You guys haven't made any case other than you'll find anything and everything to demean the President, whether it holds water or not. It's almost like you don't even think when it comes to something negative against GWB. To you, it must be true, so let's throw it out there.

Here's something else to think about. If you're opposed to this statement by GWB, "I've made it very clear to the Congress that the use of federal money, taxpayers' money, to promote science which destroys life in order to save life -- I'm against that", then you must logically be in favor of experiments performed by the Germans during WWII on unwilling human guinea pigs. Experiments which may have saved someone else's life, or at least prolonged it. See, I can go to extremes just like you.

Posted by: MonsterMark

Bravo, Ken, Bravo!