Lincoln vs Cadillac Forums

(This is the forums archive - If you want to get back to the main site simply click the banner above and you will be taken to our homepage.)

Lincoln vs Cadillac Forums is the Ultimate Online Resource for Owners and Enthusiasts of American Luxury Cars. Feel free to browse through our archive - but make sure you make it back to our main site - Lincoln vs Cadillac Forums

Cadillac XLR : Cadillac CTS : Cadillac : 2005 Cadillac STS : Cadillac Forums : 2000 Lincoln LS : Lincoln Mark VIII : Lincoln Mark VII : Car Wax
Lincoln Town Car : Lincoln Air Suspension : Lincoln Continental : Lemon Law : Do It Yourself Car Repair : Lincoln vs Cadillac Forums : Mesothelioma

Back to the Archive Main Page

Pages: 1

Different stall converters or gear ratios?

(Click here to view the original thread with full colors/images)

Posted by: Hotrodlsc1

I have a 90 Mark VII se with 3.27 traction lock. The tranny went and I replaced it with the the tranny from my 88 LSC. I can't wind the car over 1200 RPMs and its impossible to break em loose, where as with the other tranny I could smoke em all day. Does anybody know if there was a change in the torque converter stall speed or the transmission gear ratio between those two years?

Thanks,
HOTRODLSC1

Posted by: Sifrino3

Well, in the next day. I will be able to tell you about torque conveters. Since Overcast will be done. (Having a tranny rebuild, tc and sk.) But on Sifrino, I got 3.73. When I put the stock tires from an 84 on. To pull it into the garage. It did a burn out in idle. I do not know what that was all about. . .

Posted by: yamaharollinhard

I would go for the tourq converter first, just dont go for 3.73's, my friend has a couple of raced out marks, and he said they were a waist of money, if you want gears go 4.10, hes been happy with those.

Credit Card:Pio Baroja:Charity:Free Ringtones:Compare