
|
Originally Posted by TownCar97
Somehow I lost the pictures
Here they are again TownCar97 |
|
Originally Posted by kovachian
So Ford put a little bit more effort into differentiating the Navedition than GM did for the Suburbalade. Big deal, it's a moot point. A few interior panels may be shaped different, there may be a few little touches around the body, but the Lincoln/Ford versions are still carbon copies of each other. I don't see any commendable and distinguishing effort put into ANY vehicle shown in this thread.
I do agree however on one point, the Nav is definitely the best choice. |
|
Originally Posted by maxmk8
Emm well??? That is part of why the resale value is crap,
|
|
Originally Posted by CpeVillStr90
You all say the negatives about the Escalade.Lets look at some positives.The Escalade may be a copy for the most part.But in my opinion is still nicer all around than the Navigator.The Escalade is a thousand times more reliable than the Navigator.Who gives a rats ass about how different something is from its counterpart if it has piss poor reliablity,which is what the Navigator has.The Escalade also outperforms the Navigator.You mention that the Escalade has ONLY 45 hp and near the same amount of torque.Well,apparently its a lot when the Escalade runs just a 7.9 in the 0-60.For a 6,000lb truck,thats not too shabby.Thats not too far from what most of your Marks run stock.And nearly 2 seconds faster than a 2004 Town Car.The Navigator does the 0-60 in 10.2.
|
|
Originally Posted by CpeVillStr90
http://autos.msn.com/research/vip/sp...mid=-1&src=vip
MSN Autos gave these scores to both in the following catergories: Escalade-overall rating was a 10 out of 10. Styling-10 Performance-9.7 Quality-10 Interior-10 Recommendation-10 Navigator-Overall rating of 8.2 out of 10 Styling-9.0 Performance-8.5 Quality-8.4 Interior-7.9 Recommendation-7.8 |
vBulletin Copyright ©2000 - 2008,
Jelsoft Enterprises Limited.
vB Easy Archive Final ©2000 - 2008
- Created by Stefan "Xenon" Kaeser