
|
Originally Posted by Joeychgo
I cant imagine what that car would do with 1100 hp.. its almost scary
|

|
Originally Posted by Gothicaleigh
The CTS is a very good base for anyone wanting to create a high performance car.
11 second CTS: I used to have a video of it on a dragstrip, but now I can't find it. Runs 11 seconds without slicks. Here's all I can find now: http://forums.beyond.ca/showthread/t-37483.html |
|
Originally Posted by Gothicaleigh
The CTS is a very good base for anyone wanting to create a high performance car.
11 second CTS: I used to have a video of it on a dragstrip, but now I can't find it. Runs 11 seconds without slicks. Here's all I can find now: http://forums.beyond.ca/showthread/t-37483.html |
|
Originally Posted by gedwardj
Yeah, but doesn't the tranny blow up at right above the torque levels of the stock 3.6? That's one thing I never got about the CTS. Why make such a cool car, then put that anchor around its neck?
|
|
Originally Posted by george_in_portland
I have doubts that they used the 3.2L engine for this. What makes you say that? The Oct '03 date?
I think it's a transplanted 4.1L V6 featured in another article which was twin turbo'd and also put out 1100hp. |

vBulletin Copyright ©2000 - 2008,
Jelsoft Enterprises Limited.
vB Easy Archive Final ©2000 - 2008
- Created by Stefan "Xenon" Kaeser