cadillac, cadillac cts, cadillac seville, cadillac forums, lincolns of distinction, forum, lincoln mark viii, Performance, parts, lincoln, mark viii, mark vii, lincoln ls, lincoln town car

Lincoln vs Cadillac Forums


(This is the forums archive - If you want to get back to the main site simply click the banner above and you will be taken to our homepage.)

Lincoln vs Cadillac Forums is the Ultimate Online Resource for Owners and Enthusiasts of American Luxury Cars. Feel free to browse through our archive - but make sure you make it back to our main site - Lincoln vs Cadillac Forums




Cadillac XLR : Cadillac CTS : Cadillac : 2005 Cadillac STS : Cadillac Forums : 2000 Lincoln LS : Lincoln Mark VIII : Lincoln Mark VII : Car Wax
Lincoln Town Car : Lincoln Air Suspension : Lincoln Continental : Lemon Law : Do It Yourself Car Repair : Lincoln vs Cadillac Forums : Mesothelioma



Back to the Archive Main Page


Pages: 1

275hp and 300hp

(Click here to view the original thread with full colors/images)


Posted by: Eldorado Touring Coupe

ok i am confused, what is the diffence between these two engines, i hered there is a different camshaft for the SLS, ESC models witch brings down the hp from 300 to 275. they say they did this so there is more low end torque, for better acceration.

so my question is what one is faster in the 0-60 times? STS or SLS, and ETC or ESC.

and what is the difference between the ETC and the ESC ( interor wise )

cuz i thing the ESC looks better than the ETC



Posted by: MonsterMark

STS and ETC are the faster puppies. Not much, but faster. At least on paper.



Posted by: Eldorado Touring Coupe

but why would they put a lower range cam for better accleration and better response, if it aint faster? it doesnt make sence

do you know if anything else besides cams are different between the engines.

i need to know how much faster it is cuz i am looking at an ESC and wondering if it is going to be alot slower



Posted by: CaptainZilog

Peak horsepower isn't acceleration. It's just a measure of instantaneous power output at a given RPM. The other cam (lower peak HP) probably provides more low end torque (which gives more horsepower lower in the powerband). That particular cam design probably sacrifices high end power to remain emissions legal.



Posted by: K2K

The Captain explains it well, low end torque is certainly the advantage of the ELC/SLS, but you don't have as much as a boost at 50+ as in the ETC/STS.

Both are really nice



Posted by: MAC1

Below is a quote from a Cadillac engineer (Bbobynski):

The 270 and 275 HP engines (LD8) are basically the same. The 295 and 300 HP engines (L37) are basically the same. The Northstar engines were rated 270/295 in 93/94. Those engines became 275/300 in 1995-99. The difference between the L37 and the LD8 engines from 93-99 is the intake camshafts....that is all that accounts for the HP difference. The 5 HP from 93/94 to 95 was due to the intake manifold design changing from the large enclosure with internal tuning tubes to the one piece, injection molded plastic manifold in 95. The difference in power levels is not due to a simple "chip" or cal change.





vBulletin Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Limited.
vB Easy Archive Final ©2000 - 2008 - Created by Stefan "Xenon" Kaeser