cadillac, cadillac cts, cadillac seville, cadillac forums, lincolns of distinction, forum, lincoln mark viii, Performance, parts, lincoln, mark viii, mark vii, lincoln ls, lincoln town car

Lincoln vs Cadillac Forums


(This is the forums archive - If you want to get back to the main site simply click the banner above and you will be taken to our homepage.)

Lincoln vs Cadillac Forums is the Ultimate Online Resource for Owners and Enthusiasts of American Luxury Cars. Feel free to browse through our archive - but make sure you make it back to our main site - Lincoln vs Cadillac Forums




Cadillac XLR : Cadillac CTS : Cadillac : 2005 Cadillac STS : Cadillac Forums : 2000 Lincoln LS : Lincoln Mark VIII : Lincoln Mark VII : Car Wax
Lincoln Town Car : Lincoln Air Suspension : Lincoln Continental : Lemon Law : Do It Yourself Car Repair : Lincoln vs Cadillac Forums : Mesothelioma



Back to the Archive Main Page


Pages: 1

Vic sentanced

(Click here to view the original thread with full colors/images)


Posted by: taylor414ce2003

to 5yrs , he probaly will only pay a fine, this piece of crap should be hung and drowned like he did to the dogs he abused



Posted by: fossten

Where did you get this information? Vick agreed to plead guilty next Monday, which is also when he is scheduled to be sentenced. In the future, please provide a link or source for your info. Your thread title is incorrect at this time.



Posted by: TheDude

Maximum he faces is 5 years and a $250,000.00 fine... I think he'll pay the fine (which is pennies to him) get a year or two sentence, but be out six months or less.

The big question is, will he have a career after he gets out of jail? I think he will, regardless that he is a P.O.S. (my opinion), people love him and his ability to play.



Posted by: taylor414ce2003

I hope the NFL bans him for life on the gambling charges regardless of how well he plays the game.People like him make me sick !!!sorry no link that is only my opinion



Posted by: Garbone

He decided to take the deal, and plead guilty. He may make it official NEXT Monday, but his deadline was yesterday...a time line extended from last Friday.



Posted by: daves2000ls

Hang him, not snapping his neck; let him down, drown him a little, then while still wet, electrocute him, then shoot him. Might have to forget about the 8th amendment, but it needs to be done.



Posted by: fossten

Interesting the hatred spewing forth on this thread. Not that I disagree with the characterization of Vick by you guys, because I do agree that he is a POS, but it is ironic that people don't view abortion doctors in a similar fashion.

After all, the way these "physicians" slash babies into little pieces and suck out their brains is quite a bit more brutal and savage and barbaric than what Vick did to his dogs. Yet we never hear anybody get worked up over that.



Posted by: TheDude

Tell that to Dr. Barnett Slepian's family.



Posted by: rmac694203

Yeah but they don't cross state lines to gamble on it.

In all seriousness though, they were saying on ESPN that the DA wanted Vick to serve at least a year. But I guess it depends on the judge as to what the sentence will be.



Posted by: fossten

Quote:
Originally Posted by 95DevilleNS View Post
Tell that to Dr. Barnett Slepian's family.
Interesting how you defend the murdered abortion doctor but have no compassion for the 50 million babies that have been murdered in the last 30 years. He had a choice, he chose to murder, somebody killed him for it. Was that illegal to murder him? Yes. Was it wrong for Kopp to murder him? Yes. Did Slepian deserve death for what he did? You bet your a$$.

Can you name for me one single thing these babies did to deserve being brutally murdered? Or name one choice they had?

I didn't think so.

You esteem dogs and babykillers higher than innocent babies. Your moral equivalence and lack of reverence for human life is sickening and stupid.



Posted by: TheDude

Quote:
Originally Posted by fossten View Post
Interesting how you defend the murdered abortion doctor but have no compassion for the 50 million babies that have been murdered in the last 30 years. He had a choice, he chose to murder, somebody killed him for it. Was that illegal to murder him? Yes. Was it wrong for Kopp to murder him? Yes. Did Slepian deserve death for what he did? You bet your a$$.

Can you name for me one single thing these babies did to deserve being brutally murdered? Or name one choice they had?

I didn't think so.

You esteem dogs and babykillers higher than innocent babies. Your moral equivalence and lack of reverence for human life is sickening and stupid.

Sure, I'll take an order of strawman bashing with a side of ad homimem. Call it a double-fallacy combo.

Not sure where you missed it, but every debate in here about abortion that I participated in, my stance has been "pro-life", or heavily leaning toward it.

Anyhow, you made the "we never hear anybody get worked up over [abortion] that." comment, I used Slepian's murder as an example of how people get "worked up" over abortion. Think before you shoot your load.



Posted by: fossten

Quote:
Originally Posted by 95DevilleNS View Post
Anyhow, you made the "we never hear anybody get worked up over [abortion] that." comment, I used Slepian's murder as an example of how people get "worked up" over abortion. Think before you shoot your load.
If that's really what you meant, which I am willing to accept for the sake of the argument, please in the future attempt to make your point more clearly and without so much ambiguity. Go back and read your post. If you want to address a specific line in a post, try quoting it so there isn't any doubt what you mean by what you say.

Not that you don't already know how to do all that, I'm just explaining that you left too much room for me to misconstrue your statement.

I apologize for flaming you. I assumed you were taking the opposite side.



Posted by: TheDude

Quote:
Originally Posted by fossten View Post
If that's really what you meant, which I am willing to accept for the sake of the argument, please in the future attempt to make your point more clearly and without so much ambiguity. Go back and read your post. If you want to address a specific line in a post, try quoting it so there isn't any doubt what you mean by what you say.

Not that you don't already know how to do all that, I'm just explaining that you left too much room for me to misconstrue your statement.

I apologize for flaming you. I assumed you were taking the opposite side.
No worries.

Everyone knows, when you make an assumption, you make an ass out of "u" and "umption". - Samuel L. Jackson





vBulletin Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Limited.
vB Easy Archive Final ©2000 - 2008 - Created by Stefan "Xenon" Kaeser