cadillac, cadillac cts, cadillac seville, cadillac forums, lincolns of distinction, forum, lincoln mark viii, Performance, parts, lincoln, mark viii, mark vii, lincoln ls, lincoln town car

Lincoln vs Cadillac Forums


(This is the forums archive - If you want to get back to the main site simply click the banner above and you will be taken to our homepage.)

Lincoln vs Cadillac Forums is the Ultimate Online Resource for Owners and Enthusiasts of American Luxury Cars. Feel free to browse through our archive - but make sure you make it back to our main site - Lincoln vs Cadillac Forums




Cadillac XLR : Cadillac CTS : Cadillac : 2005 Cadillac STS : Cadillac Forums : 2000 Lincoln LS : Lincoln Mark VIII : Lincoln Mark VII : Car Wax
Lincoln Town Car : Lincoln Air Suspension : Lincoln Continental : Lemon Law : Do It Yourself Car Repair : Lincoln vs Cadillac Forums : Mesothelioma



Back to the Archive Main Page


Pages: 1

Cam spec question

(Click here to view the original thread with full colors/images)


Posted by: Black87LSC

Im going to be doing a timing chain on my T/C very soon, and I figure while im there why not put a little more cam into it. I was just wondering how big a cam the stock computer can handle without converting to mass air? The car has high miles, but has been very well maintained so i would think it would be fine with a small cam. I'm just looking to give it a little bit of a lumpy idle I'm thinking a Ford Racing B cam would be adequate for what i want, could the speed density setup handle that?



Posted by: thamarkman

I think you would notice gains using the Ford Racing B cam. I thinks its pretty mild. Just remember that your speed density won't recognize it and therefore won't take full advantage of its potential.



Posted by: evillally

If you change the cam, you will need mass air. Otherwise, the computer will go apesh!t...



Posted by: thamarkman

Well there ya go. Ask one question get two different answers. Anyone else want to chime in?

I think you will be OK, but your gains won't be as much as with mass air. So you change the cam a little bit, big deal. The computer is still going to give the same amount of fuel and air as before. Imagine if the cam was really worn, the engine still runs right.

Obviously Mass Air is a better way to go, but people do make gains with speed density. How is speed density going to go apesh@t? Why doesn't it go apesh@t with intake and exhaust? Its preprogrammed to specifications. I've heard its on the richer side for fear of leaning out cylinders.

This is just what I've read, I have no real experience changing cams with speed density. I would like to hear from someone who has actually done it.



Posted by: Black87LSC

Yea, I plan on converting to mass air, but I just didnt want to have to convert so soon. My car needs a lot of little things right now including the timing chain, and Ive been looking for an excuse to make it rumble If I have to convert it for the cam, so be it. But, if it will hold an idle and run decent, Id rather just throw the cam in for now



Posted by: Sixlitre

Crane and Comp cams sell cams

that are made to play nice with your speed density system. Gackner over on the Bronco forum has done several.

Sixlitre



Posted by: Black87LSC

COOL! Thanks again Sixlitre!!!



Posted by: rebrown

You might not have much of a choice if you want roller. You can probably go with a non roller, but then you have to break it in. When I redid my 90 TC, I thought I was ok with a roller truck cam which was a little smaller than a factor HO cam, but I had to go with a SD computer from a 88 mustang and then had to get the 19# injectors. Of course I went with ported mustang heads. Good luck.
Rob





vBulletin Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Limited.
vB Easy Archive Final ©2000 - 2008 - Created by Stefan "Xenon" Kaeser