
|
Originally Posted by MonsterMark
I added the bold text for effect...
Subject: John Kerry's Military Service www.authentiseal.org <snip> On 18 Feb. 1966 John Kerry signed a 6 year enlistment contract with the Navy (plus a 6-month extension during wartime). On 18 Feb. 1966 John Kerry also signed an Officer Candidate contract for 6 years -- 5 years of ACTIVE duty & ACTIVE Naval Reserves, and 1 year of inactive standby reserves (See items #4 &; #5). Because John Kerry was discharged from TOTAL ACTIVE DUTY of only 3 years and 18 days on 3 Jan. 1970, he was then required to attend 48 drills per year, and not more than 17 days active duty for training. Kerry was also subject to the Uniform Code of Military Justice. Additionally, Kerry, as a commissioned officer, was prohibited from making adverse statements against his chain of command or statements against his country, especially during time of war. It is also interesting to note that Kerry did not obtain an honorable discharge until Mar.12, 2001 even though his service obligation should have ended July 1, 1972. Lt. John Kerry's letter of 21 Nov.1969 asking for an early release from active US Navy duty falsely states, "My current regular period of obligated service would be completed in December of this year." On Jan. 3, 1970 Lt. John Kerry was transferred to the Naval Reserve Manpower Center in Bainridge, Maryland. Where are Kerry's Performance Records for 2 years of obligated Ready Reserve, the 48 drills per year required and his 17 days of active duty per year training while Kerry was in the Ready Reserves? Have these records been released? Has anyone ever talked to Kerry's Commanding Officer at the Naval Reserve Center where Kerry drilled? Hmmmm ? On 1 July 1972 Lt. John Kerry was transferred to Standby Reserve - Inactive On 16 February 1978 Lt. John Kerry was discharged from US Naval Reserve. Below are some of the crimes Lt. Kerry USNR committed as a Ready Reservist, while he was acting as a leader of Vietnam Veterans Against the War: 1. Lt. Kerry attended many rallies where the Vietcong flag was displayed while our flag was desecrated, defiled, and mocked, thereby giving aid and comfort to the enemy. 2. Lt. Kerry was involved in a meeting that voted on assassinating members of the US Senate. 3. Lt. Kerry lied under oath against fellow soldiers before the US Senate about crimes committed in Vietnam. 4. Lt. Kerry professed to being a war criminal on national television, and condemned the military and the USA. 5. Lt. Kerry met with NVA and Vietcong communist leaders in Paris in direct violation of the UCMJ and the U.S. Constitution. Lt. Kerry by his own words & actions violated the UCMJ and the U.S Code while serving as a Navy officer. Lt. Kerry stands in violation of Article 3, Section 3 of the U.S. Constitution subsequent support of the communists while leading mass Lt. Kerry's 1970 meeting with NVA Communists in Paris is in direct violation of the UCMJ's Article 104 part 904, and U.S. Code 18 U.S.C. 953. That meeting, and Kerry's protests against our military in the year that followed, also place him in direct violation of our Constitution's Article 3, Section 3, which defines treason as "giving aid and comfort" to the enemy in time of warfare. The Constitution's Fourteenth Amendment, Section 3, states, "No person shall be a Senator or Representative in Congress, or elector of President and Vice-President ...having previously taken an oath to support the Constitution of the United States, engaged in insurrection or rebellion against the same, or given aid or comfort to the enemies thereof." A.L. "Steve" Nash, MAC Ret, UDT/SEAL SEAL |
|
Originally Posted by Punisher
Blah blah blah and Bush didnt fullfill his guard requirements, even though he was treated to a nice guard spot thanks to daddy. Yea try to defend Bush on that but I think it will just show how biased you are. To me its clear he was given special treatment. There was a long list and he just goes and gets in on the first day, gimme a break. I think its awfull that someone who had to dodge a previous war thinks he is right in leading thousands of troops to do what he was unwilling to do.
|
|
Originally Posted by MonsterMark
In the words of Dan Rather...Mr. Kerry, would you please respond to these questions.
Were you or were you not aiding and comforting the enemy? Did you not fail to complete your committment to the US military? Where are your naval reserve records proving you performed your duties and were not awol? Why did you wait 20 years to get a discharge from the navy? Answer the questions Mr. Kerry. It doesn't matter if the questions are true or not. Just answer them anyway. |
|
Originally Posted by Punisher
I ask you this MonsterMark,
If he was aiding and comforting the enemy why was he not charged? Surely there were just as many people pissed about it back then. |
|
Originally Posted by Joeychgo
<yawn>
Lets keep talking about 35 years ago. Stuff that was far enough ago nobody has a clear memory of all the details. Just PLEASE,, lets not talk about the wonderful job GW Bush has done for the last 4 years...... Last thing I would want to do is base my decision on the present or the future. |
|
Originally Posted by Joeychgo
Yeah, I noticed Bush being the poor attacked soul with the swift boat idiots......
I noticed the liberal media covering Kerry then too. And the speculation is that the CBS documents came from some idiot BUSH pissed off some time ago........ Kerry isnt involved, and your liberal media has pretty much been reporting the whole document story is BS. |
|
Originally Posted by Joeychgo
<yawn>
Lets keep talking about 35 years ago. Stuff that was far enough ago nobody has a clear memory of all the details. Just PLEASE,, lets not talk about the wonderful job GW Bush has done for the last 4 years...... Last thing I would want to do is base my decision on the present or the future. |
vBulletin Copyright ©2000 - 2008,
Jelsoft Enterprises Limited.
vB Easy Archive Final ©2000 - 2008
- Created by Stefan "Xenon" Kaeser