Lincoln vs Cadillac Forums

(This is the forums archive - If you want to get back to the main site simply click the banner above and you will be taken to our homepage.)

Lincoln vs Cadillac Forums is the Ultimate Online Resource for Owners and Enthusiasts of American Luxury Cars. Feel free to browse through our archive - but make sure you make it back to our main site - Lincoln vs Cadillac Forums

Cadillac XLR : Cadillac CTS : Cadillac : 2005 Cadillac STS : Cadillac Forums : 2000 Lincoln LS : Lincoln Mark VIII : Lincoln Mark VII : Car Wax
Lincoln Town Car : Lincoln Air Suspension : Lincoln Continental : Lemon Law : Do It Yourself Car Repair : Lincoln vs Cadillac Forums : Mesothelioma

Back to the Archive Main Page

Pages: 1

Huge Kerry News Just Breaking

(Click here to view the original thread with full colors/images)

Posted by: MonsterMark

Huge Kerry News Just Breaking

The Naval Archives have the following on Kerry in their files:

(4) Boxes filled with message traffic

- CTF 115 messages
- COSDIV 11 messages
- Kerry awards and admin messages
- Command Histories
- Misc papers

Looks like it is going to be very busy down at the Archives on Monday morning, 9:00 a.m.EST. (Developing story)

Posted by: Lincolnman

Quote:

Originally Posted by MonsterMark

Huge Kerry News Just Breaking

The Naval Archives have the following on Kerry in their files:

(4) Boxes filled with message traffic

- CTF 115 messages
- COSDIV 11 messages
- Kerry awards and admin messages
- Command Histories
- Misc papers

Looks like it is going to be very busy down at the Archives on Monday morning, 9:00 a.m.EST. (Developing story)

Dig up all the dirt you want. John Kerry is going to be our next President.

Posted by: Pepsi2185

Keep us posted on the details. By the way what are those??? CTF & COSDIV

Posted by: Joeychgo

Click here for another way to look at things

Posted by: MonsterMark

Or another way to look at it... several million killed because of John Kerry's actions after the Vietnam war. Including 1000's of additional US servicemen in Vietnam because of the treason committed by John Kerry.

Posted by: Lincolnman

Quote:

Originally Posted by Joeychgo

Click here for another way to look at things

You are the Man Joey!!!

Posted by: MonsterMark

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pepsi2185

Keep us posted on the details. By the way what are those??? CTF & COSDIV

CTF - Coastal Task Force
COSDIV - Coastal Division

Forget Kerry's forms. These are the messages that Kerry would have called in by himself during (hopefully) many of the actions in dispute. And believe me, the swift vets are not as upset about Kerry's medals. It is what he did and said after the war and the biography he introduced at election time rewriting history that put these guys over the edge.

I was very comforted to hear that even if Kerry apologizes NOW, it is too late and they will continue to put out the truth for all to see.

Posted by: Lincolnman

Quote:

Originally Posted by MonsterMark

That has nothing to do with the fact that GW lead our fine young people into a war that was completely unecessary.

Posted by: Marine

Dont even go there. Ask the Millions of freed Iraqi's if there was no reason to go. Ask the Kurds he gassed with WMD!!!

Quote:

Originally Posted by Lincolnman

That has nothing to do with the fact that GW lead our fine young people into a war that was completely unecessary.

Posted by: Pepsi2185

Come on now lets not go over the iraq war, and the WMD again.

Posted by: MonsterMark

Quote:

Originally Posted by Lincolnman

That has nothing to do with the fact that GW lead our fine young people into a war that was completely unecessary.

You know, you're right...
Bush 43 shouldn't have attacked Al Qaeda
Clinton 42 shouldn't have gone into Kosovo
Bush 41 shouldn't have defended Kuwait
Reagan should have left the Soviets to continue building their arsenal.
Carter, heck Carter didn't do anything, did he
In fact...
We shouldn't have gone to defend the Vietnamese
We shouldn't have defended the Koreans
We should have stayed out of Nazi controlled Europe
We should have donated the Hawaiin islands to the Japanese
We shouldn't have tried to defend Europe in WWI. That only led to WWII
We should have never fought each other in the Civil War
We should have never fought the British for our freedom.
We should have never set sail and taken the land from the indians
We should have never been born

Posted by: Pepsi2185

Hey, Im gonna try that one on my mom, LOL. Why should i mow the lawn it will just grow back. ROFL.

Posted by: Punisher

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pepsi2185

Hey, Im gonna try that one on my mom, LOL. Why should i mow the lawn it will just grow back. ROFL.

lol

Posted by: Lincolnman

Quote:

Originally Posted by MonsterMark

I agree on the first and ninth we shouldn't have.

Posted by: Lincolnman

Quote:

Originally Posted by Marine

Dont even go there. Ask the Millions of freed Iraqi's if there was no reason to go. Ask the Kurds he gassed with WMD!!!

I never debate war with a U.S. Marine!

Posted by: Lincolnman

Quote:

Originally Posted by MonsterMark

Or another way to look at it... several million killed because of John Kerry's actions after the Vietnam war. Including 1000's of additional US servicemen in Vietnam because of the treason committed by John Kerry.

It seems like we would have heard that one on the six o clock news back when the war was going on. Getting millions killed because of treason surely would be a headline. Could this be more republican propaganda?

Posted by: Kbob

Quote:

Originally Posted by Lincolnman

I agree on the first and ninth we shouldn't have.

So you're saying that we should have just bent over and took it for 9/11 and Pearl Harbor?

Posted by: MonsterMark

Quote:

Originally Posted by Lincolnman

Study a little history on the matter. It seems the left only cares about US human life and they put such little regard for all human life. Oh, how compassionate and hypocritical at the same time.

The United States has saved hundreds of millions of lives over the last century. That fact is (in the words of Dan RatherNot) unimpeachable!

Posted by: Lincolnman

Quote:

Originally Posted by Kbob

So you're saying that we should have just bent over and took it for 9/11 and Pearl Harbor?

Absolutely not. We did what we had to do for Pearl Harbor and 911. It's this Iraq war that was not absolutely necessary for us to take on without U.N. sanction.

Posted by: Lincolnman

Quote:

Originally Posted by MonsterMark

How does this relate to John Kerry?

Posted by: MonsterMark

Quote:

Originally Posted by Lincolnman

How does this relate to John Kerry?

I knew you had no idea about who John Kerry is. If the rest of the left actually knew and actually cared, this would be an Bush 80%/20% Kerry election instead of the Bush 65/45 Kerry it is going to turn out to be.

Maybe this will help.
http://www.opinioneditorials.com/gue..._20040909.html

Posted by: Lincolnman

Quote:

Originally Posted by MonsterMark

Let me explain something. When I converse with you guys abuot these issues, I'm not referring to any reports or statistics I've heard or read. I'm talking about real life experiences I see everyday. I see the union halls full of American workers who need to support there families. At the same time I see new construction going on with foreign workers who will work for penneys and consumers not being passed on the savings. I see American jobs being sent to foreign countries and the savings not being passed on to the consumer, who by the way has no job . This is happening now under the Bush administration. When Clinton was in office the union halls where empty. I personnally don't care for Kerry, but what other choice do I have? Certainly not GW!!! The republicans do not care about anyone making less than $150,000 a year. Thats a hypothetical number so don't throw stats at me, but you know what I mean.

Posted by: Punisher

Quote:

Originally Posted by MonsterMark

Wow its goin to be very hard for this to be a 65/45 election but your the expert!!! =p

Posted by: MonsterMark

Quote:

Originally Posted by Punisher

Wow its goin to be very hard for this to be a 65/45 election but your the expert!!! =p

Typo, thanks for pointing it out. 55/45. I started at Bush 50/48/2 and have since bumped it up to 55/45, dropping Nader out because he hasn't made it on a lot of ballots. Factoring in Nader, 53/44/3. Nader gets a bump because of the people, no matter what common sense is laid out in front of them, will vote for the libertarian party or anybody else before voting for Bush. Too bad too. Bush is the only choice the Democrats have given us.

Who have the Democrats given us since the late '60's.
Jimmy Carter,

Walter Mondale,

Michael Dukakis,

Bill Clinton,

Al Gore,

and now John Kerry.

What a stellar lineup. The best in the bunch was Clinton and that was only because his weather vane moved in whatever direction the wind blew, and fortunate for us, that has been a refreshing southerly breeze since 1994 when the Republicans took back the Congress after 40 years of the Dems fouling up the air.

Posted by: MonsterMark

Whew. Dodged a bullet on this one.

Bitter and still angry after all these years. Who would have guessed.

Posted by: Kbob

Quote:

Originally Posted by MonsterMark

Whew. Dodged a bullet on this one.

Bitter and still angry after all these years. Who would have guessed.

And people complained about Zell Millers speech

Posted by: redman

Posted by: MonsterMark

Don't know which way your gate swings??? Try out this quiz.

I need to get out of the sun, so says the results.

http://fray.slate.msn.com/id/2103764/

Posted by: Biocow

We ran a simulation today at University and based on Growth, Inflation, Good News, President rerunning, Duration, Party, War, and Intercept the results are Bush 57% with current data.

Posted by: redman

Posted by: Kbob

Quote:

Originally Posted by MonsterMark

Don't know which way your gate swings??? Try out this quiz.

I need to get out of the sun, so says the results.

I'm a "little red"

Posted by: MonsterMark

There is still hope for you. After all, global warming is coming and the ozone is being depleted, so there will be plenty of opportunities to get "sun-tanned".

Posted by: mach8

Quote:

Originally Posted by Lincolnman

Absolutely not. We did what we had to do for Pearl Harbor and 911. It's this Iraq war that was not absolutely necessary for us to take on without U.N. sanction.

The US is and should remain independent of the UN which has no interest in what is in the interest of the citizens of the US, does not support anything like the US Bill of Rights, and only seems to want to drag us down to the level of a third world country. We don't need a sanction from this globalist organization to do anything. About 70% of the global population lives without electricity, ready to go there?

Posted by: Lincolnman

Quote:

Originally Posted by mach8

I've never heard anyone say that about the UN. If the US is independent then why are we a member? Why is bush asking for their help now? 70% is kinda high don't ya think?

Posted by: JohnnyBz00LS

Quote:

Originally Posted by mach8

NEWS FLASH! There is a difference between the US being the world leader and being the world ruler. This distinction seems to escape most of the GOP.

Posted by: mespock

Quote:

Originally Posted by mach8

Wasn't it the US who started the United Nations (originally the League of Nations, Woodrow Willson).

What does that say about the United States if we pulled out!

We can't keep looking at the United States as the god of the world. What happens when the rest of the world stops with the US! We can't be so arrogant and act like we are the supreme race (I think someone already tried that back in the late 30's and early 40's).