cadillac, cadillac cts, cadillac seville, cadillac forums, lincolns of distinction, forum, lincoln mark viii, Performance, parts, lincoln, mark viii, mark vii, lincoln ls, lincoln town car

Lincoln vs Cadillac Forums


(This is the forums archive - If you want to get back to the main site simply click the banner above and you will be taken to our homepage.)

Lincoln vs Cadillac Forums is the Ultimate Online Resource for Owners and Enthusiasts of American Luxury Cars. Feel free to browse through our archive - but make sure you make it back to our main site - Lincoln vs Cadillac Forums




Cadillac XLR : Cadillac CTS : Cadillac : 2005 Cadillac STS : Cadillac Forums : 2000 Lincoln LS : Lincoln Mark VIII : Lincoln Mark VII : Car Wax
Lincoln Town Car : Lincoln Air Suspension : Lincoln Continental : Lemon Law : Do It Yourself Car Repair : Lincoln vs Cadillac Forums : Mesothelioma



Back to the Archive Main Page


Pages: 1

90 TC vs. 94TC

(Click here to view the original thread with full colors/images)


Posted by: gradymotorco1

Hello, I have decided to get another Lincoln, and this time I wanted to go with the 90-97 Body. I didn't want to spend much so I found these two for the same money=
1990 TC Signature
Blue with Tan Leather
104,000
Most options, but no CD, or Moonroof.
Has a leaking left air strut.

or

1994 TC Cartier
White with Blue Leather
200,000 miles
All of the options
Runs Great.

I really dont know a lot about the 4.6, but I called the local parts houses, and asked for the price of some parts for a 90 vs. a 94. Now this is at Garage Discount:

Alternator= 90 70.00, 94 110.00, Wires = 90 20.00, 94 39.00, L. Rad Hose=
90=14.90, 94 48.00

I wanted to know which one sounds the best to you guys.
Thanks



Posted by: 02LSE96LSC91SE84TC

Only based on miles, the 90. A well maintained 5.0 will go for a good 200000. The 4.6 already has that, a good motor, but hard to say for how much longer.



Posted by: 02LSE96LSC91SE84TC

If you do your own basic car stuff, the 90 should be easier to work on. Everything on the 5.0 is straight forward.



Posted by: Black87LSC

Quote:
Originally Posted by 02LSE96LSC91SE84TC
Only based on miles, the 90. A well maintained 5.0 will go for a good 200000. The 4.6 already has that, a good motor, but hard to say for how much longer.
Indeed...



Posted by: pepperman

Get the 1990 Town Car!!!



Posted by: Jason_MarkVI

Quote:
Originally Posted by pepperman
Get the 1990 Town Car!!!
That right! Please listen to pepperman's advice!



Posted by: 92 Arizona Towncar

I would go for the 4.6... The last just as long, if not longer... 268K on mine, and still running strong... A lot of motor issues have to do with your general maintenance...



Posted by: Nakoa

i prefer the 90 because they stick out.



Posted by: 95ltc

Quote:
Originally Posted by Nakoa
i prefer the 90 because they stick out.

What are the differences on the outside?



Posted by: Nakoa

90 was the only year to have a real chrome bumper.



Posted by: 92 Arizona Towncar

91-94 there were two chrome strips going around the perimeter of the body, with large headlights...

95-97 there was only 1 chrome strip around the perimeter, headlights are more ompact. I can't remember if it was only 96 & 96 that had the light bar across the rear, or if it was 97 as well...



Posted by: gradymotorco1

Yeah, I have been leaning to the 90 but It has one little problem, the left passenger air suspension bag is leaking when the car is off. I talked to a friend at the local Ford Dealer, he said that the 90 could just have a set of 89 TC or 90-91 Crown Vic springs put under it, and that I didn't have to get the strutmasters springs. Any Thoughts?
Thanks, Dave



Posted by: 02LSE96LSC91SE84TC

If the bags are anything like Mark VII bags, there easy to replace. They should be similar in design.



Posted by: 92 Arizona Towncar

Quote:
Originally Posted by gradymotorco1
Yeah, I have been leaning to the 90 but It has one little problem, the left passenger air suspension bag is leaking when the car is off. I talked to a friend at the local Ford Dealer, he said that the 90 could just have a set of 89 TC or 90-91 Crown Vic springs put under it, and that I didn't have to get the strutmasters springs. Any Thoughts?
Thanks, Dave

You should replace both since the other one may be just as bad as that one... Cost is around $200 to replace and 1-1/4 hrs to do by yourself.

As for the switch to springs, some people swear by it, others call it heretic. It's really a personal choice.

I switched my airbags with Arnotts(see link at right) 2 years ago, and have not had a problem...



Posted by: Black87LSC

I like the coil springs, because they will NEVER leak!



Posted by: 92SedandeVille-TownCar94

I remember reading somewhere that the 1990 floated too much on the highway, and they redesigned the front suspension in 1991 to make it handle a little better.

Do the 1990's use the AOD?



Posted by: Sixlitre

Quote:
Originally Posted by 92SedandeVille-TownCar94
I remember reading somewhere that the 1990 floated too much on the highway, and they redesigned the front suspension in 1991 to make it handle a little better.

Do the 1990's use the AOD?
Yesin they do

That's why it's SO important to have a remote filter

http://www.supermotors.org/vehicles/...=27528#content

and large external trans cooler

http://www.supermotors.org/vehicles/...=27288#content

Sixlitre





vBulletin Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Limited.
vB Easy Archive Final ©2000 - 2008 - Created by Stefan "Xenon" Kaeser