
|
Originally Posted by hoss1324
That is my point the blocks are almost the same therefore the supercharger on the aj34s might fit on to the aj35, all it does is compress air right? so the heads and valve size, shape, color, creed doesnt matter. Maybe a tap and dye set is required to jerry rig the thing on an line up a few holes, but thats the part where i'm stuck, i dont know where to find out if it will line up.
|
|
Originally Posted by thamarkman
Is there a big weight difference between the 3.9 and 4.6?
|
|
Originally Posted by daveo
Quick I'm comming from the import world but could you use a mass air controller? They usally hack into the Mass air and you fool the computer into thinking less air is comming in. I was just wondering if you considered that already. I don't think that the compression ratio will be that bad but you would always have to use high test to fight off detanation. I was running 25 psi on a 9:5:1 motor on good old pump gas.
|
|
Originally Posted by Quik LS
Well - here's the e-mail I got last night... sooooon
From: ATSTurbo@aol.com [mailto:ATSTurbo@aol.com] Sent: Thursday, July 07, 2005 10:35 PM To: Lou Senko Subject: Re: SuperCharger for Lincoln LS LOU, THOUGHT YOU MIGHT LIKE TO SEE THE PROGRESS I HAVE MADE. BOLTED THE '01 LS HEADS ON THE BLOCK (PART NUMBER IS THE SAME FOR THE BLOCK), AND TRIMMED THE NECESSARY SECTIONS OF THE MANIFOLD. WATER TEMPERATURE SENDER WILL BE REMOVED FROM THE HEAD AND MOUNTED IN THE COOLING WATER PASSAGE IN THE RADIATOR HOSE HOUSING I MADE. THE HOLE IN THE HEAD WILL BE PLUGGED. SHOULD BE DONE IN A FEW DAYS. PULLEY ROUTING AND IDLER SETUP IS DONE, AS WELL AS WATER PIPES, ETC. FIGURING THE THERMOSTAT LOCATION OUT NOW. THEN PORT & POLISH THE MANIFOLD, SUPERCHARGER, AND PAINT & BOX IT. THOMAS (GEOFF) KNIGHT THOMAS KNIGHT TURBOS BOOSTHEAD.COM 786-243-2000 22050 SW 155 AVE MIAMI, FL 33170 |
| We talk boost all the time but we often neglect airflow. The bottom line is that an engine need CFM airflow to make power. According to some very detailed calculations (and I am no engineer or mathematician so these are NOT my calculations!) a basic 3.8 needs about 350cfm naturally aspirated. At 10psi and 5000rpm, it needs about 550cfm. Based on the charts I have for the M90, this is exactly what the M90 puts out meaning that these calculations seem to hold up. It also supports my notion that Ford very carefully designed the SC as a package that works together. No more, no less. Now keep in mind that no amount of porting can increase the output of a positive displacement blower. All porting can do (in terms of airflow) is extend the rpm range capability of the blower. So if we assume that porting has been 100% effective in increasing the rpm range of the blower, we can calculate that after taking into account factors for temperature and M90 blower efficiency, 900cfm airflow will be needed to support the same motor at 6000rpm and 18psi. Here is where things get ugly. To generate 18psi and 900cfm on a motor with 100% VE requires 24000rpm with the M90 which, if in theory is even possible through porting, the net output after taking into account heat generation and loss of efficiency is a net of 675cfm. Herein lies the secret as to why people can't make high rpm power with their M90's and why Coy Miller needed a cog drive to spin it. The more boost you make, the more heat eats into your output, combined with an VE rating of about 72-75% at 18psi and you have passed the point of diminishing returns. We do not have hard data on the MPII regarding output at high rpm and high boost so unfortunately we have to make some guesses, but I've used best case scenario for comparison purposes. |
|
Originally Posted by Quik LS
The idea is we are going to run 5psi on Stage 1.
Stage 2 - 8psi with the Snow Performance cooler. Stage 3 - forged internals and such..... |
|
Originally Posted by rocket5979
I will stick to 6-8 lbs boost on a centri for a while once I start mine.
|
|
Originally Posted by Quik LS
That's exactlly where I'm coming from. Just more daily driving hp.
|
|
Originally Posted by hoss1324
screw the supercharger if nobody can figure one out, how did that guy get the rear mounted turbo, i would be happy with that. i want plans
|
|
Originally Posted by rocket5979
The intake mounted supercharger will be a heck of allot harder to fab up than a centrifugal supercharger. A centri is pretty simple actually, you fab up the mounting brackets and then fab the tubing and your good to go. Allot more leeway for custom placement and design with a centrifugal than a positive displacement(Eaton roots) supercharger. The turbo is another route to go too. Getting a turbo or supercharger itself is not going to be the hard part of a project like this, it will be tuning for it and also making sure you dont have any breakage.
|
|
Originally Posted by Dead President
If the centrifugal is so simple why hasn't anyone done it? I guess I could answer that myself because there is basically no market for one. Just a handful of owners who want more out of their daily. Also, another main problem is lack of space to mount a turbo/supercharger(centri) in the engine bay. I have yet to see a centrifugal type supercharger or turbo(in engine bay) installed on an LS.
|
|
Originally Posted by Dead President
If the centrifugal is so simple why hasn't anyone done it? I guess I could answer that myself because there is basically no market for one. Just a handful of owners who want more out of their daily. Also, another main problem is lack of space to mount a turbo/supercharger(centri) in the engine bay. I have yet to see a centrifugal type supercharger or turbo(in engine bay) installed on an LS.
|
|
Originally Posted by Quik LS
Correct - plus the $$$ for a centri is much more.
|
|
Originally Posted by Dead President
Anything is possible with cars. It's all about the dollars though, it's always about the dollars.
To put it this way, if I had the money to heavily modify a LS, I wouldn't own a LS. Maybe something along the lines of a XJR, M5, S600, etc. |
vBulletin Copyright ©2000 - 2008,
Jelsoft Enterprises Limited.
vB Easy Archive Final ©2000 - 2008
- Created by Stefan "Xenon" Kaeser